this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
888 points (99.3% liked)

196

16725 readers
2904 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

Lemmy.world censors only “removed” and the N word. Lemmy.ml censors “bitch” and various slurs. I believe their users can still see comments with these words in (?), though the censored words are removed if they post them themselves

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Am I missing something? I have absolutely no idea what you guys are talking about.

Is there a slur somewhere in this post or the comment section? And TIL that Lemmy communities can censor words. I’m from blahaj.zone btw

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Lemmy instances are able to censor words; it can’t be set per community. When viewing a comment from an instance that censors some word, that word will be replaced with “removed”. This applies to both comments sent by users of that instance, and comments sent by external users.

Blahaj doesn’t censor any slurs

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Blahaj doesn’t censor any slurs

That feels like a weird sentence

[–] PotatoKat 2 points 9 months ago

Only federates up-votes and doesn't censor slurs, I find that funnier than I should

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Ah, thank you for explaining.

Bizarrely, the reason I’d asked the question at all is because your comment that I’d replied to was rendered as a top-level comment rather than a reply to another comment.

So I was wondering if, rather than individual words being censored, entire posts/comments were being hidden, but not replies to them. I guess that’s actually just a bug or something, because I can see what you were replying to now.

I’ve had this experience of feeling like I’m not seeing the full thread / that someone is replying to something I can’t see a handful of times. It’s a weird one.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

feddit.uk doesn't censor anything at the moment, because I accidentally broke the slur regex.

Normally, users from censored instances can still see rude words, they just get removed "in flight" if they try to post anywhere.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Firmly believe we should ban all mention of Scunthorpe from the instance.

[–] SpaceNoodle 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Aha, so it seems that other instances do censor external comments for their own users. It was “fag-got”.

[–] SchmidtGenetics 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So they censor removed and not fag. That makes zero sense lol.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

So thet censor removed

Hmm

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Well the first one has basically one meaning that's derogatory (including the definition of a bundle of sticks used for kindling; that's literally why it became a slur as it implies you want to burn them) while the three letter word is also slang for a cigarette in much of the world.

[–] SchmidtGenetics 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

removed and fag are used interchangeably in much of the world. Both have other means, both are derogatory and both mean gay.

Makes no sense to censor one and not the other.

[–] captainlezbian 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah they’re used interchangeably by the gay men I know

[–] xantoxis 4 points 9 months ago

The 6-letter version means a bundle of sticks, or a stick, which is how it came to mean cigarette. The 3-letter version is an abbreviation of the 6-letter version. Both of them mean cigarette, and both of them are an anti-gay slur.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I’m no historian or etymologist but I saw one on YouTube once who said a very similar term was used for poor older women who supposedly went around hunched over all the time picking up sticks for firewood, and then was later transferred to homosexual men to imply they were weak, effeminate, outcast, etc

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I just assumed it also censored the shorter form, since I ran into that before when quoting Martin from The Simpsons. I was wrong.