this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
158 points (92.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27468 readers
1540 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I saw a post that talked about racism towards people and when I talked about it the response I got was very heated and a person even called lemmy.world a community of 'hitlerites'

I have been around for a week or so and this is my first time seeing such explicit vulgar reaction towards another community, is this a one-off or should I block hexbear?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 142 points 1 day ago (6 children)

TLDR: they are right-wingers pretending to be left wing

[–] [email protected] 11 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Why would supposed right-wingers be holding Leftist theory reading groups, hosting mutual aid comms, donating to Palestinian gofundmes, and supporting trans rights to some of the highest degrees on the fediverse? Irony? Seems like a silly hypothesis.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 hours ago

hosting mutual aid comms

I've seen those posts (I have no filter).... "I need money for rent" 🦗 🦗 🦗

[–] [email protected] 15 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

What does the Y axis represent here?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 18 hours ago

Technically, the X-axis doesn't represent anything either, as the far-right plot point curves upward, rather than continuing.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The amount of mental gymnastics being done to justify their ideology

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 hours ago

Mental gymnastics is the term given to people who read books by the mental couch and potato chip crowd.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

"Y" is the name of one of the major meme/shitpost contributors on lemmy.ml

[–] TheRealKuni 7 points 22 hours ago

Separation from reality, maybe?

[–] whotookkarl 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

It looks like another way of drawing the political compass left/right (collective vs individual rights) on the x axis and authoritarian/libertarian (obedience to centralized authority hierarchy vs distributed political pluralism) on the y axis. Tankies and far right would be in auth q1 and q2, far left q3, and not representing q4 labeling the quadrants from top left clockwise.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

If we read it as a political compass

Auth+

Lib-

[–] weeeeum 50 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I love this image. Something that always confused me is that they are communist, but support russia? An extremely far right government?

[–] Diplomjodler3 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Authoritarians like authoritarian regimes. They'll perform extreme mental gymnastics to reconcile their preconceived notions with reality, like the tankies that declare China to be socialist. Also, most of them see the US as the Great Satan that is responsible for any and all evil in the world. Therefore anybody who opposes the Great Satan must be good.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I can't help but wonder if tankies are the political equivalent of flat-earthers. I should probably ask that on NSQ some time, when I can figure out a way of asking that won't get me banned.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago

I can’t help but wonder if tankies are the political equivalent of flat-earthers.

One way forward is to ask them for evidence for their viewpoints and investigate their sources for errors. The problem of the flat-earther is that there is objective evidence of a 3D rounded Earth that they can't adequately counter with objective evidence.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Damn, that analogy is apt af

[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

There's no support for the Russian Federation. Support for the USSR? Absolutely, but not the RF. There's critical support, as in the RF currently takes an antagonistic stance towards the United States, which many Leftists see as the greater global evil, but no leftist genuinely thinks the RF is doing that out of "good intentions" or has any model that Leftists should replicate.

That sums it up.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I’ve spoken to plenty who were way too sympathetic to Putins ‘Ukrainians are Nazis’ chat with complete disregard of the nuances.

[–] partial_accumen 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Support for the USSR? Absolutely

Wait, really? The ones responsible for, among other things, the Holodomor? Those guys? Why?!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Marxists support the USSR as the world's first Socialist State. They don't believe it was some perfect wonderland free from troubles, issues, problems, etc, rather, they acknowledge that the USSR was real Socialism with real victories, like free healthcare and education, an elimination of famine in a country where starvation was regular, doubled life expectancies, dramatically lowered wealth inequality while dramatically raising wages, and over tripled literacy rates to near 100%.

Hexbear aren't unique in general support for the Soviet Union, the overwhelming majority of Marxists see it as far better than Tsarist Russia and the modern Russian Federation.

[–] partial_accumen 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

They don’t believe it was some perfect wonderland free from troubles, issues, problems, etc, rather, they acknowledge that the USSR was real Socialism with real victories, like free healthcare and education, an elimination of famine in a country where starvation was regular, doubled life expectancies, dramatically lowered wealth inequality while dramatically raising wages,

"doubling" the life expectancy? Life expectancy was 30 years old prior to the USSR forming in 1922, so yes "doubling" to 67 took until 1967, and before they doubled it, they dropped it to 23.6 years old. Tens of millions of Soviet citizens died early deaths to get there. Starvation didn't end for many and rationing was commonplace. I suppose killing off a sizable portion of your population would mean less mouths to feed, but what a horrible approach to try to solve that problem.

Perhaps a better measure would be infant mortality. The USA, with its "worse" healthcare, has had consistently less than half infant mortality (or even lower) for every year the Soviet Union existed.

and over tripled literacy rates to near 100%.

...in Russian. If you spoke a different language, like Ukrainian, it was forbidden by USSR law from teaching it in schools. This happened to dozens of languages in other Oblasts.

dramatically lowered wealth inequality while dramatically raising wages,

On the surface this looks good, but that would be with a Western view of what earned wages could buy. Even with money there was limited food to buy for decades at a time during the Soviet Union. Further, you couldn't just do something like go a buy a car. You had to get on a wait list for years to even have an option to buy one.

Hexbear aren’t unique in general support for the Soviet Union, the overwhelming majority of Marxists see it as far better than Tsarist Russia and the modern Russian Federation.

Better than the final Tsar or Putin, probably, but those are both really low bars to gauge a win by.

I'm not saying everything about the Soviet Union was bad, but holding it up as an example to aspire to would be rejected by most folks that would be forced to live that life (or die an early death under its heel as a consequence of actions of the state). Do the Marxists you're referring to really pine to live in 1940s or 1950s Soviet Union?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

A bit dishonest to point to the drops in life expectancy and the general 1940s and 1950s period without mentioning World War II, where the Nazis waged a war of extermination and genocide on those they considered genetically inferior, don't you think? Same with comparing a highly developed country that saw no land fighting in World War II to the country devastated the most by it that was a feudal backwater only a couple decades prior when it comes to infant mortality. The bit on literacy is also misleading, the vast majority of all SSRs pre-Socialism were illiterate.

Outside of curiously leaving out World War 2 and the massive devastation it brought (80% of combat in World War 2 was on the Eastern Front), as well as comparing directly to the United States that never saw the same destruction and started the century several laps ahead, your only real criticism was a lack of consumer goods. This is true, light industry was lacking and being closed off from the Global Economy was indeed a contributing factor to its dissolution, but you could have pointed to that honestly.

No, most Marxists don't want to go back in time to the first Socialist state, they would rather learn from what worked and what didn't and be part of building a Communist future.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie 2 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

What makes you a "tankie" if you don't share their beliefs?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If you agree that "russia sucks" make someone not a tankie, then you'll conclude that 99% of Hexbear are not tankies.

[–] finitebanjo 1 points 1 hour ago

Can you go over there and get a poll started?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

People usually call me a tankie

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie -1 points 2 hours ago

You called yourself a tankie

[–] [email protected] -3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

we don't, we just hate the us more.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's obvious you hate yourselves most.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

See, this is why capitalization matters.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

im not a native speaker but wouldnt the word for this in this context be "ourselves"?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago

haha love that

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago

Bend the far right and tankies closer to the center dot.