this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
160 points (94.4% liked)

News

23601 readers
3579 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Wayfair’s CEO has an end-of-year message for employees of the online furniture company: Don’t shy away from doing more work and blending your work with your life.

“Winning requires hard work. I believe that most of us, being ambitious individuals, find fulfillment in the joy of seeing our efforts materialize into tangible results,” CEO Niraj Shah said in a note to employees earlier this month celebrating the company’s recent success, and which a company spokesperson confirmed to CNN. “Working long hours, being responsive, blending work and life, is not anything to shy away from. There is not a lot of history of laziness being rewarded with success.”

all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Harder work and longer hours requires increased compensation you greedy bastard.

[–] pivot_root 18 points 1 year ago

It does come with increased compensation. Specifically, for the C-suite executives who get a nice bonus for all their hard work in making the company more profitable. Demanding other people work harder is hard work, after all /s

[–] assassin_aragorn 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. The whole point of engineering is to make our lives lazier, you fucking kumquat. Working harder has rarely been rewarded over working smarter except by room temperature IQ CEOs.

  2. Did they say this in between golfing? Or while traveling on a private jet? They see all of that as proper work and business. If playing golf is actually doing business then pay me overtime for doing the back 9 in my free time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And travel expenses.

[–] cabron_offsets 42 points 1 year ago

Fuck off and die.

[–] FlavoredButtHair 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ok... So not shopping at Wayfair. I never really did, but not going to now.

[–] Tarquinn2049 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wayfair is just a consolidated virtual storefront for thousands of small companies that wouldn't have been able to afford an online presence on their own. It's a cool concept, there is a reason they seemed to come from nowhere and properly compete with established services. But it also means product quality and level of customer service are gonna be all over the place, though averaging out to be quite poor on both fronts.

My parents have been burned so many times with ordering from wayfair. Mostly by stuff arriving broken from not being packed properly for shipping, but also alot of deceptive marketing. The wayfair virtual storefront doesn't seem to do a very good job of policing their back-end clients.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I've found nicer stuff there at affordable prices vs most furniture stores and it's better than going round Amazon. There's always 5 stores with identical photos selling what looks like the same thing and reviews are high for one and low for others so it's kind of hard to know what you're buying. Finding stuff takes a fair amount of work but most of what I've gotten is good.

But every now and then the box arrives and a corner is ripped off so random parts have fallen out in transit and others are scratched. Wayfair is generally good about resolving issues like that but it's a pain to deal with.

[–] GlitzyArmrest 4 points 1 year ago

Ikea is better and sometimes cheaper anyway.

[–] AshMan85 28 points 1 year ago

eat the rich

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is not a lot of history of laziness being rewarded with success.

I feel like that's very much not true. Laziness is the mother of invention, after all.

[–] halloween_spookster 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure seems like CEOs fit in the category of lazy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yet they contribute little invention to human society. Curious beasts.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

I wake up every day living the dream of delivering more value to the shareholders.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

The low level workers work harder but don't get the rewards for their hard work. Those rewards go to the upper levels of the company. Of course the CEO wants employees to work more. He will benefit more than they will.

[–] AgentGrimstone 17 points 1 year ago

Cool. You gonna pay for those longer hours tho? Didn't think so.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

His net worth went from 1.6 billion dollars to $600 million, which is why he wants other people to work harder. 😒

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Work harder with no reward except the satisfaction of having worked hard

[–] iAvicenna 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And the satisfaction of knowing that your boss profits more and gets to keep his well deserved yacht!

[–] lickmygiggle 11 points 1 year ago

My wife left wayfair and got a job at the exact same level at three times the salary. Perhaps he should better compensate his employees.

[–] Aceticon 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Working hard is the very opposite of Efficiency - the object is to produce more in less time, not spent more time to achieve just the baseline results.

In my experience, the places were you have to "work hard" (invariably without extra pay for it) are the ones where either middle management is shit and you're working extra to make up for day-to-day their incompetence and/or high level management is shit (and their profitability "strategy" is to the short-term of reducing costs by cutting manpower well below what is appropriate for the operation, rather than process improvement, capital and training investmentment to improve efficiency) and you're working extra to make up for their incompetence.

Either way, it's the worst paid people sacrificing themselves to make up for the incompetence of better paid ones.

Anybody with in demand skills in such a company should GTFO as you really can't correct structural problems due to incompetence of the higher-ups and arent paid to make them your problem.

[–] pageflight 9 points 1 year ago

There is ~~not~~ a lot of history of ~~laziness~~ unionizing being rewarded with success.

FTFY

[–] chitak166 8 points 1 year ago

Or you can make less profit by paying more workers.

[–] Treczoks 5 points 1 year ago

1.5 x pay for overtime, then?