this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
352 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19924 readers
4132 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid 89 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] logicbomb 128 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

This is exactly what he did. He apparently organized the ouster of George Santos, and also was interested in ejecting Matt Gaetz if he was able to before he (Kevin McCarthy) resigned. His intention is to leave the GOP fucked by having only the slimmest of majorities while punishing the people who worked against him.

It's the GOP civil war, and they all deserve it.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fascism always eats itself

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago

They need to finish before we foolishly elect another #GOP #fascist.

[–] SinningStromgald 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To bad he failed at getting rid of Matt Gaetz.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think that's over yet as the House Ethics Committee hasn't released it's report.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No way Bakersfield isn't returning another maga republican.

This affects fundraising. He was Mr Moneybags, that's how he held the caucus together to the extent he did.

I think the count of Republicans is going to be the same.

[–] logicbomb 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If there is a single moment where the Democrats can have the majority, before the Republicans are replaced, then they will have the opportunity to do some worthwhile actions. There is also one other Republican who is expected to leave to take a job at a college.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] assassin_aragorn 6 points 1 year ago

Surely it can't be that difficult to goad McCarthy into continuing his vendetta after he leaves office. He's no friend to Democrats, but he doesn't have to be our friend to decide that he doesn't care if we win, so long as Gaetz and company lose.

[–] MacGuffin94 4 points 1 year ago

And him leaving means less money. Guy was an ahole of the highest order but he knew exactly how to get rich Republicans to give out their money. I highly doubt he passes that on and no one currently is in a position to replace him in terms of fund raising.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

If only he had done that after the 10th failed attempt to become speaker

[–] jordanlund 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was watching the talking head shows last night at someone raised a good point:

McCarthy was only good at fundraising, that was his strength.

After 1/6, corporate donations for the insurrection candidates dropped off a cliff, and without that fundraising, McCarthy literally has nothing.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can see that. Given the actions of the current Speaker, I don't see the party changing back any time soon.

[–] jordanlund 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nope, it's going to take a full implosion before anything changes, and if Trump loses in '24, he'll keep coming back until he wins or dies.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I don't think it's a question of "keep coming back". Whether he wins or loses, he won't leave. I want to be clear I am prognosticating, not advocating, but I feel strongly that the next election will lead to some kind of violence - regardless of outcome.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] jeffw 3 points 1 year ago

It’ll be the latter

[–] affiliate 49 points 1 year ago (6 children)

McCarthy […] said he is leaving “to serve America in new ways.”

this is very ominous sounding

[–] GardenVarietyAnxiety 20 points 1 year ago

It'll be a media gig

[–] inclementimmigrant 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EmpathicVagrant 8 points 1 year ago

Lobbyist slot maybe?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

By the dumpster out back behind the Denny's

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

who? oh, they guy who barely squeaked onto the position, spent the year doing nothing while nearly getting fried, then finally did in a tantrum?

oh, yeah, real loss there...

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Redistricting in 2022 turned CA-20 from strong blue to strong red, so it's unlikely that a Democrat will fill the seat. But - and I never thought I would say this - thank you, Kevin McCarthy, for further threatening the American Fascist majority in the House.

[–] BaronVonBort 16 points 1 year ago

Kevin: “you guys don’t want me here? Fuck your majority.”

[–] PumpkinSkink 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"No matter the odds, or personal cost, we did the right thing... in this spirit that I have decided to depart the House at the end of this year"

Never thought we'd agree. Hope more people decide to make the right choice.

[–] jeffw 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The part where he kissed Trump’s ass and tried to sell the insurrection as a peaceful protest? Or…?

[–] PumpkinSkink 6 points 1 year ago

No the part where he's leaving.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You agree with that quote? That "we did the right thing"?

[–] anon_8675309 4 points 1 year ago

They mean by quitting.

[–] eran_morad 13 points 1 year ago

Good. Fuck off and die.

[–] Donjuanme 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's a, he's a loser, loser little, little titty-baby

[–] Viking_Hippie 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Someone, sodomite, sent me a bag of poop.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jar-Jar Binks has a Caribbean black accent

[–] anon_8675309 10 points 1 year ago

Don’t let the door hit ya where Mother Nature split ya.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So where is the revolving door of corporate lobbying sending him?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FReddit 9 points 1 year ago

Good riddance.

He's about as useful as a dead donkey's dick.

[–] Shadywack 6 points 1 year ago

Shoves as many people over as possible on his way out of the aisle

[–] profdc9 5 points 1 year ago

Oh no! Anyways...

[–] YoBuckStopsHere 4 points 1 year ago

The ego is so harmed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

i guess he figures he can't possibly do any more damage at this point

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So a special vote for a new congressman in January?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

From the article:

Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom is required under state law to call a special election within two weeks of McCarthy’s seat becoming vacant. That special election must take place between 126 and 140 days later, though it may be able to coincide with California’s congressional primaries on March 5.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›