this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
485 points (98.4% liked)

World News

32348 readers
55 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Health experts say axing plan to block sales of tobacco products to next generation will cost thousands of lives

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NocturnalEngineer 226 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Why benefit society when you can just fuck it over whilst profiting from short term gains.

God I hate how this planet functions. Tax the fucking rich already.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago

Taxxing won't do anything because structurally the Rich have the most power in the system. The only way to fix this is to systematically remove the Rich through whatever means and remove the means which enables them to exist.

[–] elbarto777 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Planet? Don't include the mice and dolphins in the way the homo sapiens do their shit.

[–] Tier1BuildABear 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dolphins can be dicks sometimes too lol

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plus have you ever seen them go through a pack of ciggies? Fuckin chimney-faced bastards so they are. REEKING of fags. Horrid creatures.

[–] kautau 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And when the planet is about to go tits up they’re just going to “thank us for all the fish” and say “so long” as they disappear into a different dimension. Truly selfish

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Boomers are having a temper tantrum in their death throes by elections these Conservatives.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 1 year ago (19 children)

This headline SCREAMS 'conservative':

  • bad for people
  • bad for healthcare
  • generate tax cuts ... for the wealthy
[–] InternetCitizen2 7 points 1 year ago

But think of the savings. Early death means budget surplus from hospice saved. /s

Can someone that still has a twitter ask Dan Patrick to take one for the economy here?

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Makes you wonder how much lobbying Big Tobacco did.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They just had an election and the government flipped from centre-left to centre-right. It could just be the classic conservative “our position is whatever is the opposite of the left!”

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Winston Peters (NZ First leader) is a total alcohol, tobacco, and racing (horse, greyhound, whatever) industry shill. I doubt he exactly needed to be bought, but this is certainly part of his price for being part of the coalition government.

ACT (secular libertarian free market folk) probably mildly supported it, and National (general centre right; largest party) is probably much the same.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Big tobacco doesn't really need cigarette sales anymore. They are all in on vape brands, where they can sell the liquid at ink-jet prices to customers for a huge markup at $6500 per liter. That's why you see vape shops on each street corner. The distribution is all streamlined. The website talks to the DHL warehouse about what stock is available, customers can subscribe to weekly delivery plans and the warehouse is filled by some factory in china.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Hard to say because they are very sneaky. We do know that Big tobacco ran a fake grassroots campaign with an imaginary dairy owner front man. ("Dairy" is the New Zealand name for corner shops/ drugstores)

Tagging you @AnAngryAlpaca - they may not need it but their greed didn't get the memo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Lol sounds like this increases tax revenues by increasing the number of addicted smokers buying cigarettes and then taxing the sales.

Really sound government policy there.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

They have actually admitted this is going to be revenue gathering. NZ has some of the highest tobacco tax in the world.

Basically their election promise was tax cuts, which they intended to do by allowing more foriegn ownership of real estate and taxing it.

After the election they found out they could only govern with the help of a populist party and a libertarian party.

The populists won't allow more foriegn ownership of real estate. Meanwhile the libertarians' wet dream is stuff like more ~~lung cancer~~ tobacco.

So we get shitty last minute law changes we didn't see coming, like this one.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Wait, they want more foreign ownership of real estate?? Are they high lol. That's going to price out every last young person there from homes that's not already priced out.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah it was straight up one of their biggest election promises.

What can I say, their core base is landlords, boomers, and people who want leopards to eat faces.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] tankplanker 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's worse than that as it's short term tax gains now but increased public health spending later from those same taxes when they start getting cancer in a decade or two.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WhatAmLemmy 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When you elect the clowns of conservative/neoliberal politics, you get what you deserve — a circus.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tax revenue that you'll have to plow right back into the health care system to treat expensive lung cancers. But hey, that's only 20 years down the line, so you look good now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yup. It's really effective. I've paid my share of lung ruining tax in my lifetime. And for most of that time I'd be happy to defend my right to soil my airways to something close to the death.

I've been clean for over a year. But that addiction is so fucking emotional that you let them squeeze you dry and you almost applaud it. The perfect capitalist drug.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago

New Zealand is scrapping a whole lot of things right now.

10 years worth of environmental protection laws is another thing being scrapped.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think it's more that pro-smoking plays better with their right wing voter base than taxes. That and the fact that ciggies can still be bought, so the younger generation will still be able to get them. I mean, it being illegal has never stopped any drug. The best way to get rid of smoking is just to ramp up the tax and wait for everyone to take up something cheaper. Even the most hardened smoker at my work now vape instead. Not amazing for you, but got to be better than inhaling all the crap in cigarettes.

Only the mega rich have a solid reason for caring about tax cuts. Everybody else should be clamouring for better services, as that is what will really be cut to give those billionaires more money to hoard.

[–] Pogbom 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've always supported this approach too but I have to wonder... is there a point where it gets taxed so high that people will just go back to the black market? What would prevent anyone from going black (heh) if it's cheaper than the legal option?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

There's already plenty of black market ciggies in both NZ and AU. Just watch one of the border patrol shows and every second person they catch is a suitcase full of cigarettes.

[–] eatthecake 5 points 1 year ago

The black market in australia is huge. Almost everyone i see smoking at work or at pubs is smoking black market cigarettes or using illegal vapes. If they crack down on the black market i expect to see a large rise in robberies of shops selling cigarettes. The taxes have gone too far. This is also why they won't ban smoking. Billions in tax revenue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SangersSequence 21 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Smoking is awful, disgusting, and through the diseases it causes puts a massive burden on the healthcare system... buuuut, educational campaigns to encourage people to stop and limiting it in media/banning advertisements is definitely the way to go over yet another prohibition law.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I think governments should always ban everything they don't like. Next up: alcohol, candy and snacks. Then maybe bars, motor sports and sex for unmarried people.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

@SangersSequence

educational campaigns to encourage people to stop and limiting it in media/banning advertisements is definitely the way to go

I don't really understand why you think New Zealand hasn't already done that. It banned all tobacco advertising decades ago. Including shops have to keep them out of sight and no signs.

Starting from the 1990s tobacco had to have gruesome pictures of diseased lungs, rotting diabetic toes, etc all over it, and health warnings.

Then they banned companies from using their own fonts, colours or logos and standardised it. Then they made the warnings take up all the pack.

Modern tobacco packs in New Zealand look like this and costs two hours' wages for just one packet.

There are gruesome PSAs about it as well.

Unfortunately it's highly addictive and it kills people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The thing I find hilarious is that a few weeks ago, when there was talk of the UK doing the same sort of thing, everyone was pointing to this legislation as an example of how it has worked elsewhere.

It didn't even last a year! All it's done is slightly annoyed a handful of teenagers for a few months.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


New Zealand’s new government will scrap the country’s world-leading law to ban smoking for future generations to help pay for tax cuts – a move that public health officials believe will cost thousands of lives and be “catastrophic” for Māori communities.

National has had to find new ways to fund its tax plan, after its coalition partner, New Zealand First, rejected a proposal to let foreign buyers back into the property market.

“Coming back to those extra sources of revenue and other savings areas that will help us to fund the tax reduction, we have to remember that the changes to the smoke-free legislation had a significant impact on the Government books – with about $1bn there.”

But public health experts have expressed shock at the policy reversal, saying it could cost up to 5,000 lives a year, and be particularly detrimental to Māori, who have higher smoking rates.

Te Morenga highlighted recent modelling that showed the regulations would save $1.3bn in health system costs over the next 20 years, if fully implemented, and would reduce mortality rates by 22% for women, and 9% for men.

“This move suggests a disregard for the voices of the communities most affected by tobacco harm – favouring economic interests,” said chief executive Jason Alexander.


The original article contains 601 words, the summary contains 211 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Anticorp 7 points 1 year ago

How very evil of them. I personally don't think smoking, or any other substances should be banned. But they just admitted they think they should be banned, but won't ban them because they'd rather have the money. Exchanging people's lives for profit.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Y’know, I gotta admit, I would have never pegged this article as one that would make my notifications go wild. 🤣

[–] veganpizza69 6 points 1 year ago (9 children)

The leading Māori public health organisation, Hāpai te Hauora, said the reversal will be “catastrophic for Māori communities”.

It's not a good idea to tell conservatives how policies would potentially harm the vulnerable, the poor, the excluded.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ikidd 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was a cowardly way to enact a law.

[–] MetaCubed 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What exactly do you mean by this?

[–] ikidd 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ban smoking if you're going to ban it. If it's unhealthy and stupid (it is) then don't just do it for the non-voters. Take a stand.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You fail to see how the ban worked.

Apparently, it's hard to quit smoking. So we stop people smoking at a young age and keep that barrier up.

This should be trivial to understand. Who made it difficult for you?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›