this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
250 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19149 readers
4295 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Asked whether they believed Trump has or has not “committed serious federal crimes,” 54 percent of poll respondents replied that he had. But 19 percent of them confirmed they’d still vote for this criminal ex-president in 2024. Along the same vein, 13 percent of those who believe Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results “threatened American democracy” still plan to vote for him next year.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

This is part of why the GOP has been manufacturing lies about Joe Biden being corrupt so urgently: They can't convince most people that Trump isn't a criminal so they're trying to convince them that both candidates are criminals so it doesn't matter.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I love how this is so patently obvious about Republican tactics, and just yesterday I had someone trying to argue that this isn't an inherently Republican talking point. "They're all crooks, so they're both the same!"

You can't convince me that some of them aren't Russian trolls looking to stir dissent and destabilize the nation.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’s obviously Russian troll farms but when researchers published their memes and other posts, they were often kind of weird and didn’t gain wide reach.

So, my theory is that we don’t need Russian trolls to destabilize the nation. We have plenty of political marketing firms right here in America that have a deeper cultural understanding and an equal amount of shamelessness.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

It would be so American if Russia hired an American firm to destabilize ourselves because we have a better understanding of the zeitgeist here.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 8 points 1 year ago

I’d argue that’s already been done. That’s why we’re here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can Russia still afford trolls these days while paying for the war?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trolls are cheap. Much cheaper than tanks.

[–] AA5B 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Plus trolls don’t need spare parts or a supply chain that can be embargoed

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes! Biden is so corrupt that the GOP had to go after his son, who isn't a politician, in order to get anything on him....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And are still failing to make anything meaningful stick - despite having "mountains of evidence" lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL 60 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For all of you kids out there - back in the Reagan days, the republicans spent a lot of time and money convincing “blue collar” people to vote against their interests. People that would benefit the most from public healthcare, better environmental standards, higher taxes on the obscenely wealthy, and a more just legal system began voting against all those things.

It was as fucking stupid then as it is now, only since the TEA party creation, they’ve gone full batshit and there’s no ideal or central mission to anchor them.

I’m saying it’s been forty years and it’s only gotten much worse. This insane death dance with Trump is the unfortunate result, and they refuse to stop it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What you need to understand is that people who voted for Reagan weren't voting to screw themselves; they were scared and wanted a "strong leader" who looked good. Even Gorbachev talked about how magnificent Reagan looked and sounded.

Don't get me wrong, I consider Reagan one our worst Presidents and a scoundrel, but if you listen to some of his speeches, you'll understand how people would trust him.

[–] rustydomino 10 points 1 year ago

Sure. Then you’ve got Donald “cofefe” Trump. They’re baskets of deplorables, plain and simple. Hillary had it right all along.

[–] AA5B 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You can argue that Reagan was an effective president because he did look and communicate the part. Whether you agreed with his policies or not, he was “presidential” and had huge standing both locally and internationally

https://www.reagan.com/the-great-communicator-ronald-reagan

Compare that to the ever shrinking Republicans since, where their image and prestige on the world stage is just less and less over time…. Until you have an embarrassment to the nation and five year olds everywhere

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Just because I like this story.

First meeting between Gorbachev and Reagan. Protocol was set in advance. Americans show up to the meeting place, talk to the reporters, then wait for the Russians to arrive. Gorbachev and his people arrive, walk over to where the reporters are waiting, and then suddenly Reagan comes outside and walks down these beautiful marble steps to greet the Russians.

The reporters go nuts, because this kind of picture never happens. The Russians are standing there with their mouths open, looking like stooges, while Reagan stands there looking like a King who has summoned some peasants for a banquet.

That a story Gorbachev told about what it was like dealing with that dirty so-and-so.

[–] Boddhisatva 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m saying it’s been forty years and it’s only gotten much worse.

Not only has the GOP had forty years to perfect their propaganda skills, they've also used that time to gut education in every state they've gained control in. That has allowed them to undermine the critical thinking skills of a huge swath of the population. In fact, in the 2012 Republican Party of Texas platform they said the quiet part out loud and explicitly opposed the teaching of critical thinking.

Knowledge-Based Education – We oppose the teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) (values clarification), critical thinking skills and similar programs that are simply a relabeling of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) (mastery learning) which focus on behavior modification and have the purpose of challenging the student’s fixed beliefs and undermining parental authority.

[–] RojoSanIchiban 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Guys, you've got to remember that these are just simple MAGAts. These are people of the land. The common clay of the new GOP. You know... morons.

[–] dhork 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"He may be a crook, but he's our crook! He hates the same people we do. Maybe criminals are simply more efficient haters!"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is in no way a defense of Trump, but history shows that right and wrong, criminal or visionary, terrorist or martyr - those are all a question of victors and history. There is every chance they see Trump in the same vein as the founding fathers - all of whom would've been strung up had the war for independence gone the other way.

They seem to simply be casting their lots with him. Whether he is a criminal or not is irrelevant to them because they believe in his vision. Which is why Trump is more a symptom of the problem than the actual problem. He has tapped into this disaffection better than any other right-winger, but it's clear there is a swell of support for these ideas.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's disingenuous to draw that correlation. Yes, the Founding Fathers were in rebellion against their parent state. That's where the parallels end. Their parent state was also ruling from the other side of the ocean and allowing any representation for the colony's interests. What Trump proposes to do is to go back to that authoritarian rule, but under his control. His base loves that idea and wants to see him be someone like Putin, whom they idolize. Freedom for themselves, and slavery for everyone else.

I grant you, they see themselves as the patriotic heroes defending what they see as their patriotic stance. But the comparison fails under minimal scrutiny.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I certainly don't mean to be disingenuous and that is a critique I take quite seriously. I assure you I post in earnest. I'm not saying there are parallels beyond the superficial or any sort of validity to Trump and his fascist sycophants. Just that from their perspective, they might see them as far more alike than you or I do.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I get it, and I upvoted you. You're presenting their perspective of themselves. I felt compelled to go further and explain how that perspective fails.

[–] LEDZeppelin 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some? Last time I checked it was the overwhelming majority of repubes

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It's about 30% guaranteed support from Republicans. That's the number of True Believers he commands. Trump and the rest are vying for the remaining 70%, but he'll always have that base 30% lead.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver 10 points 1 year ago

Brainless twats shall forever be brainless.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Most of his base likes him because he's a bad candidate. They have been trained by their chosen media to desire bad traits and cast uncertainty and doubt on good traits. They love him precisely because he is horrible. If there was a worse candidate than Trump, they'd vote for them instead. In fact many of these people who are already fed up with Trump are going right to RFK because they desire bad traits.

[–] splicerslicer 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And 100% of them need to find a new country to live in and stop trying to turn mine into a fascist hell hole

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know you think that you can fix ~~him~~ it, that ~~he's~~ it's just in need of your love...

At what point do you call it quits?

Update: I now realize that it could be read like I'm talking about Trump. I'm not. I was trying to make it sound like that thing people, who are in abusive relationships, say.

[–] themeatbridge 7 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

"But if we don't vote Republican, the Democrats will eat babies!!!1!"

I'm so tired of this shit.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Politics is no different than sports, with people rooting for rapist and murderers because they wear the same colors.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The term “thick as thieves” was created for a reason.

[–] cashews_best_nut 1 points 1 year ago

Also "thick as pig-shit"

[–] Treczoks 5 points 1 year ago

AKA some people are so stupid, you wonder how they can walk and breathe at the same time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Republicans are the party of Law and Order! That's why they support people they think are criminals!

[–] RichCaffeineFlavor 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Election season is ramping up. Time to engineer polls to make your base hate the other team's base.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Are you saying that Trump supporters won’t support him if he’s a criminal?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›