196

The good thing about this is that I will never attract these guys.

This is satire, right?

right?

You could present those guys with a supermodel or the fucking platonic ideal of a woman and they would go "that's 7.1 at most, stop overrating"

MFers out here rating women like they're dogs at fucking crufts

why did you have to expose me to this nonsense

shes pretty im envious

I’m tentatively giving her an 8 but I need to see the MRI and CT scan to be certain.

No way, please tell me that subreddit is satire 😱

What do you have to look like to achieve more than a 7? A biblically accurate angel?

oh yeah this is why im sapphic

I know most Lemmy user's have a hate boner for Reddit for many other reasons than this, but IMO all of the /r/AmIUgly, /r/AmISexy, /r/rateme, and other rating subreddits are an absolute cancer on the site.

90% of posts are from new accounts with questionable verification methods, with the others being people trying to shill their OF profiles. I can accept that, but what really boils my piss is that almost all of the comments follow this pattern:

• Slating anyone remotely attractive for being attention seeking, or posting incorrectly on a sub "intended for ugly people", all while that person only comments on the attractive people.
• Obvious negging, as if giving some super attractive girl a 6/10 is going to make them jump into their DM's and ask "what can I do to be better for you sempai?"
• The inevitable stalking of their account, attempt to give into their DM's, or reverse image search that ends up with a post on these subs gaining you 100 new IG followers and some thirsty cunts liking and commenting on your pics.
• Toxic behaviour when someone tries to actually be nice, or to offer some friendly advice. If I had a penny for every time a woman commented on a post on those subs with some advice, only for some guy to shit on them and say "lol no they need to go to the gym"

Obviously, these subs are going to exist, but they just make me end up hating people, because it's always the same pattern.

I vaguely remember evidence posted to reddit that the whole r/truerateme sub was started by 4chan incels to try and lower women's self esteem. Part of the plan was to post photos pretending to be super conventionally attractive women and give them low ratings anyway. IDR how conclusive it was in terms of proof, but it seemed more likely than not to me at the time.

That sub also had a "guide" to their rating system posted. I looked at it once, and the absolute lowest ratings were like burn victims or women with noticeable physical disabilities (which is in itself not a cool sentiment), but they had "example photos" of conventionally attractive female celebrities rated at like a 3. Their whole criteria were either subjective or inscrutable above that: you could randomly shuffle most of the chart and it would make as much sense, even if you bought into their idiotic logic (which again, you should not).

Anyway, attraction is way more subjective than any of these shitstains would have you think and everyone can be someone else's favorite.

this is actually insanity...

Idk she’d be prettier if she talked to a therapist about her insecurity in her appearance

Dudes out here comparing phrenology notes like that shit still valid.

I'm giving her a 11 out of 10

How these mfs sound like

Internet Comment Etiquette just did a video about this.

https://youtu.be/GA3-AhAMS8U?si=s2OsqfJOHiqGH_fZ