this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
792 points (99.4% liked)

politics

21672 readers
7612 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 hours ago

Republican administrations tank the economy when it's business as usual.

This is the dissolution and piecemeal sale of the US Government.

Of course there is going to be a fucking recession!

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This isn’t a trade war, it’s a Stupid Economic Operation.

Trump is just tracing from Pitin’s playbook.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I never would have thought I would see a military operation so poorly done on such a large scale in my life. And clown world went: "Sure we had one massive cluster fuck of an operation, but what about a second?"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Was it done poorly though? I mean the end result is that the US has become a vassal state of Russia without a nuclear fallout. Seems like an epic win to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

Well the first was a russian failure the second an american failure. So I guess kinda a wash, with massive negative consequences.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I feel that it's looking fairly likely to be more of a Trumpression.

[–] Glitterbomb 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

A Trumpster fire.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife 6 points 1 day ago

Make Depression Great Again

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I didn't think it was humanly possible to see such a concerted effort to destroy an economy in my life. Even Hitler didn't try to do this with Germany.

Once upon a time I couldn't get myself to watch old 80s and 90s cartoons anymore because I felt too old and cynical for them... but now I realize that the villains on those shows have nothing on Trump and his dipshit cronies. Only they are somehow more fleshed out despite being literal cartoon villains.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife 13 points 1 day ago

Even Hitler didn’t try to do this with Germany.

Hitler "fixed" Germany's economy by basically borrowing a bunch of money and then attempting to destroy the people who had loaned it to him (Jewish financiers were a large source of the borrowed money, as was the Soviet Union - a little-known but majorly important part of the Ribbentrop Pact and related German-Soviet agreements).

[–] Bytemeister 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It might actually go the Hitler route. He's already made concentration camps for "illegal" human beings. It's only a matter of time until they figure out that they are deporting a practically free workforce with no rights.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Trump is peak Dunning Kruger.

[–] CharlesDarwin 5 points 1 day ago

Funny you say that since I've been seeing what looks like 80s GI Joe cartoon in memes about fElon and little d teaming up.

[–] RememberTheApollo_ 4 points 1 day ago

Because the writers weren’t clueless. Trump is willfully clueless.

[–] werefreeatlast 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love it!

Obamacare vs Trumpcession

Yet the Republicans will vote Trump next time around.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

vote Trump next time

The implication here is quite scary.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They meant Don Jr.

Donald will be in the hyperbaric chamber attaining immortality, returning in 2032 as the Undertrump.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 23 hours ago

isnt he excited that a economic event named after him?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Looks like Sleepy Don has done it again. What happened to better economy on Day 1? Is he going to say the days so far don't count? Let's hear some more excuses about how Biden made the job so hard you can't improve things by 1%. You only need to make excuses for a little less than 4 years now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago

what would PRESIDENT ELON say.

[–] Diplomjodler3 139 points 2 days ago (15 children)

What could possibly go wrong when you give the most important job in the world to the most unqualified person ever?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

…twice.

We gave it to the most unqualified person ever… twice.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Stern 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imagine speedrunning your way into the great depression.

[–] just_another_person 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For billionaires it's a "buying opportunity" though.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Gotta take advantage of rock bottom prices!

[–] psmgx 70 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Risk? Its his goal. Crash the market for his ultra wealthy amigos to buy up everything

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] RagingSnarkasm 56 points 1 day ago

Hey Wharton School: This is why you shouldn't sell degrees to rich parents for their spoiled children.

[–] QuarkVsOdo 10 points 1 day ago (7 children)

If you are overall green now... sell.

He is going to make it worse.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Only if you need the funds short term, if you are a ways off from needing the funds then hold what you've got and start building a cash reserve to buy more shares when it's low.

[–] QuarkVsOdo 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I think setting a stoploss and then just stay in/ cash out automaticly is also completely viable (as long as your trading fees of cashing out and re-enter are well covered by total earnings so far)

Taxes are another thing though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

That is a totally viable method, it's just not the one I want to pursue.

Also, yeah I don't even want to think about the taxes....

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Time in market beats timing the market. You're never going to now when stocks are "low". You're just as likely to wait JUST a little too long and then end up buying when it's higher than it is now.

If you have AVAILABLE cash now, that isn't needed for an emergency fund, put it in the market now.

If you want to hedge your bets a bit, then just invest a smaller amount every week to distribute the buying power in case the market keeps dropping.

Trump could just announce that tariffs are dumb and he's never doing another one tonight, and the market jumps in off hours trading. Or the market could bounce up for a couple days then crash. Or the market could stay down for the next 4 years.

It's impossible to predict when the "buy back in" period should start, so just don't even try.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL 80 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Well . . yeah. He’s a demented rapist.

Who the fuck is just figuring this out?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›