this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
443 points (99.1% liked)

politics

20392 readers
4372 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Despite the 22nd Amendment barring a third term (“No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice”), Trump continues to suggest he could run again, raising the idea at a Black History Month event and with Republican governors.

Legal experts say the Constitution is clear that he cannot run, though some supporters, including Rep. Andy Ogles and Steve Bannon, are pushing for a constitutional amendment or a 2028 campaign.

Meanwhile, Trump has expanded executive authority in his second term, drawing criticism for undermining congressional checks.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I have to say, it would be extremely funny if they changed the constitution and then Trump lost to Obama

[–] horse_battery_staple 11 points 4 hours ago

No its so much more fucked than that. It's literally god emperor language.

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-third-term-constitutional-amendment-andy-ogles-2025020

The wording of Ogles' amendment proposal suggests that previous consecutive two-term presidents, such as Barack Obama or George W. Bush, would not be allowed to run for a third term.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago

Obama - Return of the Jedi

[–] [email protected] 32 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah well, the Constitution says a lot of things. However, it’s fairly clear a large segment of the American population doesn’t care what the Constitution says as long as it’s their team in power.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly, they’re going to say the courts are just against him, or something, and then kick off.

[–] WindyRebel 3 points 5 hours ago

And I would say:

Yes, the courts are against him on that because it’s fucking clear that our founders never wanted a king or authoritarian in charge and two terms is more than enough and already set.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Criminals aren't allowed to run for president either. Here we are.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 minutes ago

wrong, it's only individual states that prohibit felons from voting or running for office.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 minutes ago

Of course criminals are allowed to run for president

[–] [email protected] 14 points 12 hours ago

According to the Supreme Court of the United States of America, Jefferson Davis and General Robert E. Lee are both eligible for the office of the United States of America (if they were still alive at least).

[–] [email protected] 18 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Barred? By whom? Really, when will the states wake up and figure out there is no "adult" in the wings that will enforce norms.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 31 minutes ago (1 children)

The constitution is like the laws of physics; god will enforce it. If not god then perhaps ligma.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 minutes ago

American exceptionalism is so stupid strong that I can actually see people thinking that.

[–] Pondis 194 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (14 children)

To be fair he wasn't supposed to run for a second term as a convicted felon, but he managed that.

I'd like to say I'd be surprised if he could win another election as his popularity plummets, but the US voters have proven themselves to be stupid and/or lazy.

[–] [email protected] 124 points 22 hours ago (15 children)

Being a convicted felon does not disqualify you from running for president, or from being elected to the office.

Fomenting insurrection does, but that got waved away "because reasons".

[–] [email protected] 58 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Because Merrick Garland is a bitch. Also more stuff.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, Colorado was handling it appropriately, then SCOTUS stepped in and told a state that they're not allowed to administer elections in their state.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Because given how shameless SCOTUS has been, not sure there's even an alternative reality where they still don't worm themselves around Garland too, regardless of what he did or how fast.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Any time Trump jokes, it's the camel's nose under the tent.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, I don’t think he’s capable of an actual joke. I’m a big fan of this analysis…. https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/politics/writer-perfectly-breaks-down-why-brits-dont-like-donald-trump-388956/

[–] Wetstew 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I've never heard that phrase before that's an excellent phrase.

[–] tronx4002 9 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Can you enlighten me? I don't understand the phrase.

[–] AngryCommieKender 8 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Camels, much like dogs, cats, and other domesticated animals, are constantly pushing their boundaries. The phrase "a camel's nose under the tent" is indicative of a camel that is attempting to find a way inside the tent so that they may eat the, most likely, food that has captured their attention with its scent.

This would be applicable to the Drumpf administration because they are, much like the camel, using a method of "throw everything at the wall and see what sticks," as well as a method of overwhelming the media with birdshot. Namely, if you're creating 50 stories a day, and doing 50 things a day, then the media and the government can't keep up.

Again similar to our camel that has enough strength to tip the tent over, and create a royal mess, in its attempt to get in.

Edit: First time I have heard the phrase as well,.but that is the meaning I would take from context.

[–] Wetstew 12 points 15 hours ago

I looked it up when I saw it, it seems like it comes from a fable with a similar moral to "If You Give a Mouse a Cookie"

A camel sticks his nose under the edge of a tent for warmth, it's owner (or a stranger w/e) allows it to out of kindness. Then the camel slowly worms it's entire body in the tent and refuses to budge.

It's a slippery slope parable.

In a sane society Trump should be in prison.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

Why do news stations make these stupid short clips with music and pictures? Just show the clip

[–] TankovayaDiviziya 14 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

It is unlikely that the constitution will be amended. Democrats still (and will always) hold roughly 50% of seats in the Congress. So any proposal to amendment will not pass. However, there is a possibility of coup if Trump does not want to step down.

[–] Raiderkev 3 points 8 hours ago

My guy, 2 years from now, there will be a redder wave from a kangaroo election, and they will amend the Constitution and end whatever is left of democracy. CISA is gutted, and will be replaced with lackeys that will confirm the fake election. We're cooked.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

You mean another coup? Another in addition to the first coup, in which several people were killed and sh*t smeared on the walls of the capitol, when people had to hide for their lives and in which some of the protectors were complicit?

The one after which the ringleader went completely unpunished and then got back into power and released the people who'd actually done it on his behalf?

I know this is crazytown now, but we don't want to forget about that first coup.

[–] AngryCommieKender 14 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

They just illegally fired, and replaced the joint chiefs. What makes you think they aren't going to arrest and replace all the democratic representatives and senators?

We're already past The Reichstag Fire

He will be trying to make The Fediverse illegal in the US within the next 6 months.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Of course he'll run and of course he'll win and og course he'll just ignore the laws about it and of course nobody is going to stop him

[–] [email protected] 17 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

I can't see him still being alive by then. He's going to have a stroke or coronary before then.

[–] MisterCurtis 13 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Or some other mysterious 3rd option

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

Imagine if a MacDonald's worker on minimum wage slipped something in his slimeburger.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 20 hours ago

It says elected. He has no intention of having another election.

[–] DMCMNFIBFFF 13 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

On November 2028, he'll be older than Joe Biden is now.

But yeah, I can see him enter the 2028 GOP primaries, win the nomination, maybe beat Harris again, and serve as acting President while SCOTUS allows it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 48 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Who's gonna stop him from running for or taking office for a third time? The Democrats? Are they gonna write a strongly worded letter? The Supreme Court? Do they have anyone with guns who will listen to them?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks 13 points 18 hours ago

The US is right in a coup. Who knows what will be legal or illegal after that.

load more comments
view more: next ›