this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
557 points (99.8% liked)

politics

20414 readers
5393 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Within hours of Maine Gov. Janet Mills publicly defying Donald Trump’s ban on transgender athletes in women’s sports, the U.S. Education Department launched a Title IX compliance probe targeting Maine’s transgender-inclusive policies.

Trump threatened to withhold federal funding if Maine did not comply. Mills firmly responded, “We’ll see you in court.”

She condemned the investigation as political retaliation and an unconstitutional use of federal power.

Maine Attorney General Aaron Frey vowed to fight back.

LGBTQ+ advocates praised Mills for standing up for students, saying Trump’s bullying would be legally challenged.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gammelfisch 12 points 1 day ago

Kudos to the state of Maine and if all else fails, secede and join Canada. Using the metric system will improve life too.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

We'll see you in court

Judges that Drumpf put there will deny any wrong doing by Drumpf, and penalise Maine.

[–] [email protected] 158 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Who's weaponizing agencies now, you projecting, pants-shitting little bitch?

AND it's the department you were going to kill? Jesus Christ who the fuck is writing this timeline‽

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

This rewrote my brain, first time I heard it.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"We accused the other guys of doing it, which makes it okay when we do it."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Modus operandi.

[–] Nightwingdragon 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I know it goes without saying, but can you imagine if Biden or Obama literally went on national television and declared to a United States governor "I am the law!" like he's a dollar-store Judge Dredd?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

maybe it would've made the trumpists like biden

[–] snekerpimp 103 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Party of small government, right? Party of states rights, right? Sounds to me they are the party of dictatorship, tyranny and oppression.

[–] Placebonickname 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And 19 year olds who help run doge!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

If we have free and fair elections in 2026 I'm looking forward to seeing these little shits dragged in front of Congress and grilled.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

As stupid as I think they are, I also feel sorry for them; they don’t realize they’re being used as pawns and will be hung out to dry as soon as it suites Musk and Trump.

The reason they’re so young and inexperienced is that everyone else realized the implications and refused for their own well-being. The fact that none of the DOGE leadership wants to be officially “in-charge” is a giant red flag.

[–] CharlesDarwin 4 points 2 days ago

Can they be charged and imprisoned while they await trial?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Never happen they'll all be pardoned.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not if literally anyone other than a Republican is elected.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot 1 points 1 day ago

We're talking about 2026, though, not 2028.

[–] Brunbrun6766 16 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 64 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No taxation without representation

Why be part of the US if it doesn't represent your interests and if there's a dictator in power?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How Canadian are you feeling, Maine? Maybe it's time for a referendum.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

A very large percentage are descendants of french canadians so I'd say very canadian

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Please let me move there first

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Look, if you had one shot, one opportunity

To seize everything you ever wanted?

one moment

Would you capture it or just let it slip?

His palms are sweaty, knees weak, arms are heavy...

[–] WindyRebel 2 points 1 day ago

Mom’s spaghetti!

[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 days ago (2 children)

“Well—I’m—we are the federal law. You better do it because otherwise, you’re not going to get any federal funding at all if you don’t.”

This sentence. First, almost "I'm the federal law," followed by just a completely wonky sentence. What a technically human being

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would fucking love for the Feds to try this with any blue state that is a net contributor (which is like, basically all of them). And then set up a (federally illegal, but we don’t care about that anymore apparently) interstate commerce and trade pact between blue states for mutual aid and economic assistance, since the federal government is currently busy destroying the federal government.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And then soldiers march on the blue states, and then the US balkanizes

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You’re forgetting that state National guards exist

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They get funding from the feds and can be federalized.

A governor would hypothetically have to convince them that the federalization order was unconstitutional.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Federalization can be countered by the federal government being so completely insane that the State Guard CO says “no, fuck you” and sides with the governor

[–] baldingpudenda 22 points 2 days ago

I would have also added, "What federal funding? You're stealing it all to pay for the handouts to the rich that think you're a fool."

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

She got under his skin so fast and he never recovered, throwing in the, "you'll never win in politics" stuff.

[–] FuglyDuck 53 points 2 days ago

why is "bullying" in quotes.

he absolutely was bullying her.

[–] swarmingnarwhal 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ottawa is closer to me in Maine that washing dc. Can we just leave already.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

✖️ canada the 51st state

✅ maine the 11th province

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot 3 points 1 day ago

It'd mean we could extend our high-speed rail line to Halifax.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 days ago

Mills is so badass!

[–] notsoshaihulud 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

OK, so what can we do to support Mills and Maine?

[–] kerrigan778 8 points 2 days ago

The best thing you can do is to push your state and governor do the same if there's any chance.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie 7 points 1 day ago

Somone, can't remember who, once complained about weaponization of government. If I can only remember, cause I think it's relevant somehow.