nwilz

joined 2 years ago
[–] nwilz 1 points 6 days ago

You can keep repeating that but it won't make fall into your definition you provided

[–] nwilz 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

None of that falls under your quote

[–] nwilz 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

One another means violent force and fraud.

Meat packers can't sweep up floor waste and sell it as grade A meat. Why?

... Because that's fraud. I support the government protecting individuals from fraud.

Imagine a for profit police department

Police are here to protect you from others, that's what I said the government is here for.

Actually it's the left that yells acab abolish the police, abolish ice

Organize to prevent outside attack means the military should protect us from foreign enemies. So no I'm not objectively wrong, actually by your own quote you provided with a source, I'm objectively right

[–] nwilz 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

The director literally said he welcomes them

[–] nwilz 1 points 6 days ago

Again, never made that argument

[–] nwilz 1 points 6 days ago

I know what I said, you clearly don't understand what I'm saying. Guards aren't the banks only security measure

[–] nwilz -1 points 6 days ago (6 children)

That's your opinion

[–] nwilz -1 points 6 days ago (4 children)

They haven't gotten that far yet. They can't audit every department in one day.

https://youtu.be/Leor8ual9tw

[–] nwilz 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

That's a strawman, I never argued that

[–] nwilz 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

If the bank kept it's money in the open with only guards protecting it yeah, but that's not the case

view more: next ›