So, this is blatantly and egregiously unconstitutional, right?
this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
237 points (98.4% liked)
politics
19881 readers
4235 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It is, but the constitution is just a piece of paper that the Republicans hate with unrivaled passion.
A 6-3 Supreme Court majority says it isn’t.
I mean, they haven't said that yet. While the current supreme court have made some genuinely insane rulings, they've generally at least made the pretence of trying to square everything they're doing with the constitution, albeit often in very strained or roundabout ways. I'm not sure if they'll be able to find a way to justify this (but I'm not ruling it out either).
Yeah my only hope with some of this shit is that Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett actually have convictions and principles that they stand by (as horrible as those may be) and aren't willing to completely destroy the Republic in exchange for expensive vacations with a billionaire.
Not holding my breath though.
They could justify it with the Chewbacca Defence, possibly replacing Star Wars names with arcane Latin legalese terms.
Clarence Thomas is coming for your arms
So is everything else he's doing but it doesn't seem to matter.
And who's going to enforce that? Surely Amy Handmaid Barrett and company will get right on that.
Creating an anti-religious-hate office is not, as long as it protects all religions equally. I don't think that's what this will do.
Sure, but to target "anti-christian bias" looks like being oddly specific about the religion you want to protect.
Yeah, but they're explicitly saying it's only to protect Christianity, so that throws that defense right out the window.
Remember how the radical right, most especially of the more Randroid type was saying that talking about Gilead states was hyperbole and hysterical, etc...?
Then they reversed 50 years of Roe. And now this insane piece of shit is back in the office, throwing red meat to the crazies that think this is a xtian nation (or that it should be one).
Inb4 they claim science has anti Christian biases
They've been saying that all along, haven't they? These are the same people that think "teach the controversy" is a good slogan to repeat over...checks notes....evolution?
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
"Good news, Trump doesn't want Congress to have any power anyway!"
Ain't no hate like Christian love.
Wow America! You really are doing everything in your hand to become a new medieval monarchy.
You have the absolutist king, the feudal lords, the hate towards any progress...
You were missing the inquisition. WERE.
We're apparently trying to speedrun European history into 4 years or less, but in reverse, and ending in the dark ages.
Yup. Trump already named immigrants the Jews of the Black Death.
I have to say I'm impressed. You got almost there in less than a month. Right now you're missing a crusade (although the turd is working very hard on that front to "celebrate" it asap) and... maybe the public and gruesome executions, but I'm sure with enough hard work you can get there before the next year.
No one expects the Ameriklan Inquisition!
I'm too lazy to post the image, but I can imagine
Monty Python was / is great.
load more comments
(1 replies)
They are treating him like King David, this goes further back than even medieval!
And this is when things get truely crazy. You ain't seen nothing yet.
the true fuckery hasn't even begun in earnest yet
I firmly believe that the fundies are trying to fulfil the prophecy of the book of revelation. Trump is playing the part of the antichrist, musk is the beast and I'm not sure who is playing satan yet but xi and Putin are both strong contenders. My concern is how the heritage Foundation interprets "lake of fire".
I just think Trump is doing all of this shit because he can, there's nobody this time around that can stop him, we rightly tried locking him up in Federal prison for the rest of his life, and he really really didn't like being mocked by Obama during the Correspondents dinner. He's going to burn it all down, and so many people are about to die, here, and all around the world.
Hello future handmaids, how are we all doing today?
Under his eye.
Fuck you and your religion.
Dear US,
wishing you a quiet revolution down the road to clean up this mess
Sincerely, a Quebecer
Dear Quebecer,
Got any room?
Sincerely, a New Englander
I hope so, although I'm not making the immigration rules :(
Thank you. I'm wishing the same for myself and my fellow not-pants-on-head-crazy people in this madhouse.
Yours,
- Your downstairs, and trapped in a failed meth-lab of a country, neighbor
The Inquisition? Nobody expected that.
It's kinda fun time travelling back a hundred years. Oh wait. No, no it isn't.
This is more of a 600 year regression to pre-Renaissance if we're being honest.
Yes but there is someone from within the last 100 years that he reminds people of
as with everything else, they'll leave the definition of "christian" absurdly vague in order to define it however they please in a given situation. then they'll go out to any actual christian churches who are accepting of "other" instead of discriminating against them, and charge them with being "unchristian/unamerican," force them to update their beliefs to hate gays/blacks/women/etc
get ready for mandatory church attendance and tithes at a govt approved jesus center
If mandatory church attendance is in the pipeline, so is a large uptick in church shootings.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Where does the Mayflower sail to now?
just to clarify, the Mayflower was full of puritans, who were being "persecuted" by being told they couldn't force their extremely narrow bigotry onto everyone else around them.
So, honestly, I'm all for shipping the zealots of to someplace else. They can leave the rest of us alone.
Trouble is there's not really any lands that some nation wouldn't object to a bunch of crazies being dropped off in. So either we'll need to ship them up to the moon, or force them to start working on atlantis.
They can colonize Mars, along with fElon.
Israel? They'd definitely object, but who cares at this point?
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›