this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
225 points (99.1% liked)

News

24566 readers
5343 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Attorney General Pam Bondi has ordered the DOJ to investigate private companies for DEI programs, potentially pursuing criminal charges.

Citing the 2023 Supreme Court ruling against affirmative action, she argues DEI initiatives violate anti-discrimination laws. The directive targets large corporations, nonprofits, and universities, with reports due by March 1.

Legal experts warn this move likely violates First Amendment protections, as courts have upheld employers’ rights to promote diversity.

Civil rights groups are expected to challenge the policy, setting up a major legal battle for the administration.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 38 minutes ago

They want to criminally investigate private companies for setting their own policies? Real small government and pro business of them. /s

[–] iAvicenna 2 points 16 minutes ago

Translation: Pam Bondi gets in line to lick Trump's ass

[–] joekar1990 159 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Oh look... An actual weaponized DOJ. Projection of drumps goals strikes again.

[–] CharlesDarwin 28 points 3 hours ago

With the qons, it is always projection.

Always.

[–] [email protected] 115 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

"she argues DEI initiatives violate anti-discrimination laws."

Up is down, wrong is right, black is white.

God I hate this country

[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 hours ago

War is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Not discriminating against brown ppl is discrimination against whites!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 hours ago

"When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression."

[–] Snowclone 12 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

My attitude at this point is that the US is getting what it deserves, you want to be as racist as possible? OK, enjoy your destroyed economy, lost civil rights, and felon president who's just white enough to steal all your tax revenue.

[–] Screen_Shatter 44 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

There are a lot of people living in the united states who don't deserve to deal with this racist bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 27 minutes ago

The people it affects most are the ones who majority voted against him

[–] Diplomjodler3 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Certainly. But an awful lot of these people stayed at home during the last election.

[–] dogslayeggs 3 points 58 minutes ago

And an awful lot of them voted FOR this. I am marrying into an Hispanic family with some people who voted for Trump... who were then surprised when they were fired from their jobs immediately after he announced the DEI orders.

[–] CharlesDarwin 22 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Indeed. Most of us either voted directly against it, sat out, or voted for some useless third party. And as infuriating as the second two groups are - most people did not actively vote FOR this shit.

And then there are the people that are ineligible to vote like kids, who definitely don't deserve this shit.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Please do not forget that republicans have been actively disenfranchising voters and making it hard to vote. Not everyone who didn’t vote “sat out”; they were literally unable to vote.

[–] CharlesDarwin 7 points 3 hours ago

Oh yes, I fully realize that.

[–] Snowclone 2 points 2 hours ago

I'm aware. I'm one of the people they want to ethnicly clense.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 hours ago

Billionaires bought the election; enough propaganda, both via manipulated social media platforms and marketing in swing states, can buy anyone willing to be the stooge of private interests the presidency.

Most Americans don't deserve to suffer at the hands at such corruption.

[–] DarkCloud 39 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Being a woman she should probably fire herself then.

[–] CharlesDarwin 24 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, she's looking a little bit "DEI" herself, there.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

We are living through the greatest constitutional crisis of our lifetimes -- maybe since the Civil War. The US has never seen anything happen like this domestically. We are rapidly moving toward the dissolution of the US and civil war.

If the courts do not prosecute Trump and Elon Musk, which is highly likely, the assault on EVERY federal service and source of funds will continue. "Throwing it back to the states" will cause the states to contract -- without confidence in any federal assistance or regulations, states will need to figure it out themselves -- and if they start seeing the federal government as something they need to protect their citizens from...well, why would they remain a part of that federal government? If the US government is completely unreliable due to the massive brain, experience, and regulation drain, what reason do states have to remain a part of that? Especially when the feds want to restrict speech and expression in the way they do.

And if the courts somehow slap down Elon and Trump and they are removed? Then we've got violence from the J6ers and likely more.

We very well might be witnessing the end of the US, as I see it. But maybe someone can offer some counterpoints

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The end of the US was on January 20th. We're just witnessing its death throes.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

We're dealing with this because the union fucked up and didn't see reconstruction thru after the civil war.

We had fucking military bases named after confederate generals. That's enough to tell you the identity of this country.

When the next Civil War happens, we don't need any Biden fucking losers olive branching the losers. We've historically done this and what has happened so far? Next time the US beats the confederates, erase their fucking shitty culture of racism and hate.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 29 minutes ago

I think the message is pretty clear that the US experiment has run its course and the country just needs to split in multiple parts instead of trying to make things work between people with vastly different interests under the same umbrella.

Let the red States become the third world country they want to be.

[–] Snowclone 13 points 4 hours ago

We know all the money is being siphoned off to Trump and his goons, and he's trying to destroy every agency, particularly the watchdog agencies, which is exactly what happened in Rome that lead to the fall of the empire. If no one is paying anyone to keep track of legal obligations you no longer HAVE legal obligations.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I think you overestimate the proactivity of the average American. I mean this is the road the US is going down on, but it'll take them a while before things get that bad.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

It's only been like two weeks and shit is already off the rails. This is moving at an alarming clip.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Could you expound on that? I don't think average Americans will be able to stop what's going on because we are too busy with work, families, and entertainment. And if, by chance, we are paying attention to the news, the 24 hour cycle and social media algorithms put some new thing in front of our faces before we have the time to process what we just saw.

Do you mean states aren't going to be that proactive, so they won't break away?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Do you mean states aren't going to be that proactive, so they won't break away?

I mean if the current style of government continue for like 20 years you'll start seeing breakaways, but definitely nothing within these four years unless something really dramatic happens. The Democrat-led states are at least as docile as the people living in them, so I can't imagine them leading a breakaway movement. I mean can you imagine someone like Newsom saying "hell yeah let's secede"?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

Okay yeah I get you now.

I think you have a good point but I do think it could be sooner. If Newsom thinks Trump may cause more damage to to his state than aid (I'm thinking about lack of disaster relief, draining of reservoirs, sending military in to deal with protests, raiding schools for illegal immigrants, stifling scientific research, going after "woke" speech), what choice will he have ?

Already, schools in Massachusetts are informing school nurses not to comply with ICE if they come through. What happens when Trump says that Massachusetts is defying the law and goes after leadership there? Will Massachusetts bend?

But I think ultimately you may be right, I suppose it might depend on how antagonistic Trump is toward blue states.

[–] TomMasz 15 points 3 hours ago

You voted for a guy who said he'd be a dictator. Now he's a dictator doing dictator things. His not doing dictator things would be surprising, not this.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This guy with 34 felony counts doesn't seem to know the law, what exactly is illegal? Eh, I guess it doesnt matter anymore, nobody is going to do anything about it until things get physical now.

[–] AbidanYre 22 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

And if you get physical for the right side, you'll get a pardon. See J6, Daniel Perry, etc.

Edit: spelling

[–] eran_morad 27 points 4 hours ago

Thank fuck they’re doing something about egg prices.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

For what? It's not fucking illegal! Fuck!

[–] CharlesDarwin 13 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Well, it also was not illegal for the FBI to investigate J6, or the crimes that donvict carried out, etc....but here we fucking are.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

I know... I'm just frustrated...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Correction: It's not immoral or unjust. Apparently though in the US it is now illegal. Bad laws can be made. I do have to question whether the DoJ can go after people without said law in place...I mean they seemingly are about to, but congressional bodies make the federal and state laws, so what law is being broken?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 hours ago

Except those laws have not yet been made. So it still remains not illegal.

If you're going to be pedantic, at least be right.

[–] Kyrgizion 19 points 4 hours ago

Man, you guys are going to have to fight to get your rights back.

And I don't mean campaigning. You need to stock up on staples and ammo...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 hours ago

It's remarkable how rich white guys have co-opted laws that protect against discrimination of minorities to protect themselves from minorities. Almost brilliant in its mendacity, and depressing that the courts will absolutely support it.