this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
139 points (89.7% liked)

Futurama

12725 readers
52 users here now

For all things Futurama

Rule 1: Don't be a jerkwad!

Rule 2: Alternate video links to be linked in a comment, below the original video.

Related Communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Interesting video I saw on YouTube which definitively shows whether Nibbler’s shadow was in the original airing of the pilot. Skip to 23:50 for the answer.

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hightrix 45 points 3 days ago

Answer: yes. It was there.

[–] Hayduke 57 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (8 children)

Meanwhile, Disenchantment seemed like it was written episode by episode. I guess it all tied up in the end, but I didn't care about 90+ percent of the arcs, so the whole series felt half-baked to me. I enjoyed it, but something felt off, by miles.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I guess I'm in the minority who liked Disenchantment. Many of the jokes fell flat, but it was cozy.

Also Laughing Horse always made me lose my shit, it was so stupid but the animation, combined with John DiMaggio's stupid laugh was perfect.

Also Jerry's ability as a moron to rightfully question God's ethics was so delicious.

[–] Hayduke 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I enjoyed it for the most part. I just had a hard time shaking how disjointed it all felt. It was missing something to keep it cohesive and flowing properly. I can't put my finger on it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

I kept thinking I was accidentally skipping episodes.

[–] Meron35 9 points 3 days ago

Disenchantment's plot felt like a D&D campaign where the DM winged it every week.

There's a reason why most D&D campaigns aren't adapted into TV shows

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They made up for that with sexy Dagmar. And Merkimer..

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I may be some sort of weirdo but Oona should be considered.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

People like you give me hope. I really, really vibe with a grown woman slurping down drugs and pace-screaming in her garden.

And of course, piracy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

I'll allow it. Honestly her "or is?" Is so great, but nobody gets it and they give me weird looks.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

I'm glad you mentioned it. I had a whole rant about how we cheer for Fry, because he's stupid and means well, and we despise Elfo, because he's an underhanded little prick.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

We stopped watching it when Netflix pulled their no families bullshit

[–] Renacles 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Did it all tie up? The whole steamland plotline got dropped completely by the end and that was basically half the show's worth of plot.

[–] Hayduke 3 points 2 days ago

I am not sure, I was just guessing it did. The last episode just had me going, "oh, OK. Fair enough." and didn't really provoke any more curiosity out of me. I think between the general fractured feel of it all and duration between seasons... Should have named it Disengagement.

I kid, sort of.

[–] jacksilver 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, "tied up" just means it had an ending. I'm not sure I really even understood what really happened in that show. It felt like a new arc started before the previous was halfway through and then different subtle parts of previous arcs sorta mattered for the current, but not in any meaningful way.

[–] Renacles 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The only constant was that Magdar would show up at the last and first episodes of the season with a new random evil plan.

The whole thing was such a mess.

[–] jacksilver 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, it was really a disappointment. The humor never quite landed so I was primarily there to see what they would do with the story. While I know it ended earlier than they planned, what/how they wrapped it up showed there wasn't too much there to begin with.

[–] Renacles 1 points 3 days ago

Pretty much, you had the Magdar plot twist at the end of season 1 but everything afterwards became: Magdar is doing something bad I guess.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Tangent! ;)

[–] Tenthrow 4 points 3 days ago

Very different show runners.

[–] Discover 46 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

IIRC Nibbler's shadow was in the storyboard for the pilot. Shown on the DVD extras

[–] Juice260 26 points 3 days ago

Mystery solved? I see comments mentioning Netflix so maybe it’s a generational thing but that’s been common knowledge to futurama fans for decades.

[–] SpaceNoodle 29 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)
  1. In season 4, an episode shows a character going back in time to the events that occurred during the pilot episode. Even though the character was not in the pilot episode, this S4 episode implies that they were there in the background, off-camera, the entire time, and playing a pivotal role in the events that kicked off the series.
  2. If you watch a certain scene in the actual pilot episode, you can briefly see that character's shadow in the background, implying that the creators had actually planned these time travel shenanigans from the beginning.
  3. Many fans claim that the shadow was not actually in the pilot when it was first aired; that it was only added in reruns and home releases after that S4 episode was written. Other fans claim to have a home-taped recording of the very original broadcast and that they do see the shadow.
  4. The person that made this video came across a social media post where a user showed off a pre-release promotional tape of the pilot episode. They contacted the user and purchased the tape for an undisclosed amount.
  5. After a drawn out sequence detailing their multi-camera setup used to record the tape playing on their TV (in an attempt to prove nothing is being faked), we see that the shadow does indeed appear in the scene just as it does in all reruns, etc.
[–] SpaceNoodle 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

This person shows the shadow on a supposed pre-release promotional tape of the episode, so the answer is probably a yes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Tap for spoilerThe shadow is there

[–] SpaceNoodle 35 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Instead of a half-hour video, it could have been a single word.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

Strong agree

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

it could have been, but then it'd just be some guy claiming it was there without presenting the evidence, and it wouldn't have settled the debate at all.

[–] roofuskit 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

People prefer succinct bullshit over the truth. That's why the world is the way it is today.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Aliens!

Or the number of times I've heard that Chinese drones are flying over New Jersey recently is baffling. One guy was telling me they were probably trying to scope out property to buy up.

Much cheaper to get a realtor or check the satellite views on Google Maps/Earth if you ask me.

[–] SpaceNoodle 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They could at least have led with it, but then I guess it wouldn't be clickbait.

[–] hightrix 11 points 3 days ago
[–] roofuskit 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I thought this was well known? Or an I just a nerd for checking myself many years ago?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The issue was that the only way to know for sure was to watch a recording of the original airing, the episode could have been modified in reruns.

[–] roofuskit 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They were released almost 4 years apart. There were plenty of copies available everywhere to reference back when this first happened. I think this is more of the show finding a new audience who now doesn't have access to those recordings. When this originally happened streaming services weren't even really a defacto thing like they are today.

Edit: The original episode is over 25 years old. The first season would have been released on DVD 3 years before the Nibbler reveal. But there were also VHS recordings and DivX/XviD copies available online.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Season 1 was released on DVD and VHS in Jan of 2002, season 4 started airing in Feb of 2002.

[–] OccamsTeapot 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They did a minor retcon later. The scene is shown again and as well as the original shadow (And nibbler's eye in the bin), you see Fry's shadow too, since he time travels back there in the Why of Fry. Unfortunately I can't remember which episode this is in at the minute

[–] MimicJar 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Jurassic Bark.

And for reference, the pilot,

[–] OccamsTeapot 16 points 3 days ago

Nice! Clearly I blocked it out because of the trauma of the ending

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Oldest mystery? Just watch the fucking episode

[–] Squizzy 17 points 3 days ago

Thats the whole point, it was said they made chabges for physical copies and reairing to close the plot hole.

Its a bit over the top but it seems to actually close an ongoing discussion.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

That is the point of the video. There were already known differences between the pre-release pilot and the one that actually aired on TV.

So, was the Nibbler-Fry plotline part of the first episode, or was it added later?

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001 4 points 3 days ago

Yeah go back and watch older South park episodes and look at how they changed Token's name to Tolkien all to make a joke about Cartman being racist.