this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
270 points (98.2% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9870 readers
1405 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] psycho_driver 33 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

All three of them aren't worth much, truth be told.

[–] SeriousMite 17 points 15 hours ago

The raccoon I just saw rummaging through the trash bin has more value as a human being than all of them.

[–] udon 26 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It's weird how in English you say "he is worth x" if you just mean he has x money/assets

[–] Kbobabob 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Is it not considered worth or net worth for you?

[–] udon 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

I don't want to argue against the correctness of the sentence in English (I think you're correct with that). I'm just uncomfortable by the conflation of two meanings. This makes:

"He spent his last penny" technically the same as "He is worth nothing"

So a rich person is "worthy", which also means they are good, have achieved good things, and we are happy they exist. A poor person is "unworthy" and we can throw them away like garbage. That conflation is a problem to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

I'm from a primarily English speaking place and you're absolutely right. The phrase is completely bizarre. Like we could talk about assets, but we equate it to the person, and it's a phrase that comes from the upper echelons of the capitalist ruling class and now everyone uses it. Like we've all just accepted the reality that our society doesn't care about people unless they can pay.

[–] Kbobabob -3 points 5 hours ago

Worth and worthy are very different words though.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Elon Musk is now worth more than the 2nd ~~richest~~ greediest man (Jeff Bezos) and the third ~~richest~~ greediest man (Mark Zuckerberg) combined!

[–] uebquauntbez 15 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine every single minion stopping to work for him. Even the bankers. He'd be stranded and helpless. No family member (if there still are any) would help him for free.

[–] rayyy 6 points 16 hours ago

That's why they demand those "other" women be baby factories.

[–] zergtoshi 15 points 19 hours ago

In my opinion Elon is worth shit, but I'm no native speaker, hence I might be confused by the phrase.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 21 hours ago

Bernie will remain our lost opportunity.

[–] ShadowZone 33 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Can we please stop calling someone "being worth" x amount of money? It's disgusting on a fundamental level.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 23 hours ago

In Germany, some people call people on the bottom of the money pyramid "socially weak"...

Disgusting as well. Whoever has billions and doesn't help otherd, is socially weak!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 23 hours ago

Yes!

I guess we can't exactly say he has more money, but we could say he has more "wealth."

But he's about the most worthless piece of shit on the planet.

[–] Valmond 3 points 20 hours ago

Okay lets brainstorm, they are all parasites on society, they are not more worthy than anyone else, but "king" has a sort of good vibe to it for many people so...

Something along Robber Baron? But again, baron is kind of cool.

Gangster? Too cool.

Oligarch is for russians right?

Child prince, too demeaning.

Hyper burglar, too complicated.

Thief sounds good IMO but they steal so much, and in history we've always been facinated with oeople being able to do that (kings, dragons, and actual thiefs).

Bureaucratic parasites? Because they steal the work by shuffling the papers. Also doesn't sound "cool".

Accountant or clerk seems to be what they actually are, cooking the book on the whole society.

Elon Musk: super clerc.

Zuccenberg: society accountant.

Bill Gates: fraudulent clerc.

...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago

i was thinking about this the other day. i know the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is disputed but i think there must be something to linguistic relativism. like, in english words describing wealth are all tied to "worthiness", and we talk about being wealthy as being more good.

in my language words describing wealth are all tied to effort: the ability and/or will to do something is "förmåga", and if someone is wealthy they are "förmögen", which i'm not entirely sure of the conjugation for but intuitively i read it as "has expended effort". this is a more neutral term, and our class divide has historically been much shallower than the anglophone world. of course this is mostly due to different social systems but... why were they put in place ho begin with?

[–] Lost_My_Mind 28 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Luigi needed more bullets.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

There's a little Luigi in all of us.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 20 hours ago

I’d certainly like a little Luigi in me.

[–] UmeU 18 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Anyone know how this is being accounted for?

Which of his assets gained him like 200+billion in the last year?

I know twitter lost value after he financed it through the saudis, so he must have gained somewhere else, anyone want to save me a Google?

[–] ViolentPacifist 2 points 6 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

this is stock value, and he gained the ~200B since the 6th of November.

[–] uebquauntbez 7 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

So if I own a single dollar and tell everyone it's a trillion worth ... does that make me rich or am I a fool?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 20 hours ago

a fool, until someone believes you.

[–] SkunkWorkz 11 points 19 hours ago

A fool unless you can convince an entire market that it’s a trillion dollars worth.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Look up unlimited money limited. It was a real company

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

Max Fosh is an absolute madman. Casually got the richest man in the world for like 2 days.

[–] jj4211 1 points 16 hours ago

No, it has to be something more imaginary than a dollar, and someone else has to actually give you a dollar for it while you claim it's only one trillionth of the amount of imaginary things you could sell to people.

Note a while ago a youtuber did a stunt to illustrate: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/8SYIksrZeu4

[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)

this just shows how much the game has no basis in merit or reality.

[–] Sanctus 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Makes me want to bring it all back to tribes and shitting in the woods. We can play the nobody gets shit if we dont game too.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

thats how I am with consumerism and buying stuff now. in the sense of like. you know what. I can still read books ya bastards and I don't need most of whats being sold.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 22 hours ago

And he’s just been put in charge of destroying all the things fed side that actually do help the working class.

This, our situation, could be worse. And this South African child of Apartheid has the power to make it so.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 19 hours ago

Ultimately, there can be only one, which is why J. P. Morgan scared Andrew Carnegie quite a bit. They just didn't get to the part where Morgan would actively bring Carnegie to ruin.

The rich are tasty even to other rich, though they'll eat the rest of us first because we can't defend ourselves or escape.

[–] Subtracty 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What will it be once he gets his hands on the government? He is poised to line his pockets at an unbelievable scale.

[–] T00l_shed 28 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

And his dad has still never loved/hugged/respected him.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Elon Musk is worth less than Vladimir Putin, and any number of Saudi Arabian royals

[–] tarellzq 7 points 17 hours ago

Elon Musk is worth less than Vladimir Putin, and any number of Saudi Arabian royals PROVE IT! Submit some links for everyone to read.

Every article about Putin's net worth lists it at $200 billion

Also, people like you always claim there's some Saudi that is richer but there's never any proof.
Also, the Saudi oil barons are wealthy families so the money is split among many.

Look, when Bezos or Musk are worth $200 billion you can speculate if Putin
is richer but Elon is now at nearly half a trillion.

PROVE IT! Submit some links for everyone to read.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The actual fact is, xelon is really only worth 3 rubles. And he has some money. Chicken manure has more value than him.

[–] Valmond 2 points 20 hours ago

But he is the king you know, gotta treat 'im with respect.

\s

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

And he doubled it from last year... system is fucked

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

worth at least that much more than them dead too

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

I'm gonna laugh so hard when the billionaires start fighting. The leopards forgot they have faces too.

[–] WoodScientist 0 points 14 hours ago

Correction. I do not know who the wealthiest person on Earth is, but it is certainly not Musk, or any of these freaks. They are all paupers before me.

I have something Elon does not have. I have something Elon won't have. I have something Elon is, in his very heart of hearts, utterly incapable of having.

Enough.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 21 hours ago

And that's just white declared. Ia nothong xompared to the amount of money some oligarchs has in black. Moving around in the not seen business