Do you have an actual argument, or are you just giving up? Because that in no way rebuts anything I said.
The native americans had lots of contracts and agreements with the U.S. government. It didn't mean shit, and the government was still tyrannical.
A contract is meaningless when corporations can:
- bulldoze any citizen they like with legal teams
- force people to have go through arbitration
- delay and deny claims to demoralize claimants even if they have a valid claim
- use AIs that deny cases for the sake of it
They wield what is essentially unchecked and arbitrary power to the detriment of the people. It is cruel. It is oppressive. It fits the definition of tyranny easily.
Two weeks of work at locally owned company is not in the same vein.
A local CEO is still a CEO. A new employee doesn't rule out a copycat motivation.
This guy had mental health issues.
The same can be said of the copycats of Columbine. People who do these sorts of things can always and easily be said to have mental health issues. That still doesn't rule out copycat motivations, as that's not mutually exclusive.
Don't be so sure.
No guarantee this is a copycat, but it is possible
Shit, I did a double take seeing your name. It's good to see you here on lemmy.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31558-z
The albedo decease from urbanization in 2018 relative to 2001 has yielded a 100-year average annual global warming of 0.00014 [0.00008, 0.00021] °C. Without proper mitigation, future urbanization in 2050 relative to 2018 and that in 2100 relative to 2018 under the intermediate emission scenario (SSP2-4.5) would yield a 100-year average warming effect of 0.00107 [0.00057,0.00179] °C and 0.00152 [0.00078,0.00259] °C, respectively, through altering the Earth’s albedo.
The albedo does have an effect, but not much of one. If we were to supplement every household with the ~30% solar power this article suggests, it would be a massive improvement and far outweigh the costs of the albedo.
Let's hope. But as we all know truth is financially dictated in our "justice" system, so it is a gamble.
Guessing here, but an absolutely a MINIMUM of an additional 20% find it secretly acceptable.
I can't wait to see the NPR article titled "Luigi Mangione was [aquitted/convicted/excuted] years ago. Why do week keep hearing his name in comment sections?", and I'll see this NPR article like 5-6 years from now.
Epstien died ~5 years ago, yet I still keep seeing people talking about him.
They're gonna attempt to do so. There's no guarantee it will work.
8===D {()}