I agree with your second paragraph.
I want Luigi to go free even if he did pull the trigger, because the jury comes to the conclusion that killing Brian Thompson was done, because ultimately CEOs need to be (hold) responsible or they aren't needed in the first place.
If holding them responsible is impossible due to a rigged system, alternatives need to be tolerated.
People (especially CEOs) need to consider the consequences of their actions.
Until very recently people in power could do as they please without fear of consequences. That needs to change one way or the other. I'd prefer them changing coursefor the better of all. If they won't, well...
zergtoshi
Plus nuclear wouldn't work without fissionable elements, which wouldn't be here without supernovae aka dying suns.
I do believe that the perception of the action of which Luigi got accused weighes orders of magnitude more than the perception of his appearance or his popularity.
It's not him who was popular in the first place.
It was what was done.
Accusing him of it in turn made him popular. That would've worked for other people too.
The judges in the USSC want to have a word with you.
Well, given that jury nullification is a thing and considering how rarely it happens, I'd rather risk the scenarios outlined by you than having no way of giving a not guilty verdict to people this way who do something illegal but legitimate.
Why let only judges make the jokes then and not the people in the jury too?
Imho that's a fairness in a sometimes unfair system.
Or use the onion network wherever possible: https://www.torproject.org/
After all a VPN requires trust in the VPN provider wheres using TOR only requires trust in the design and knowledge about its limitations
Pronounced 'shitler', right?
Fun fact: the main source of cholesterol in the human body is said body's liver.
This post would require "x " though.
I suppose it depends on the definition, but yeah - GALACTIC POWER