this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
203 points (98.1% liked)

News

23530 readers
6332 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Manifish_Destiny 11 points 2 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Sterile_Technique 11 points 2 hours ago (2 children)
[–] TokenBoomer 1 points 1 hour ago

Quality work

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Hahahah this is amazing.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon 47 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] alchemist2023 4 points 2 hours ago

this is good more of this please

[–] peopleproblems 29 points 5 hours ago

"forcing leaders to ask themselves uncomfortable questions about their own preparedness for a threat landscape that appears far more serious than many realized just a week ago."

It's probably even more serious than they think it is right now too.

In fact, all I see are talks of securing these executives. And as the article points out, security is a sunk cost. There is no financial gain. That means as security gets more expensive, they will have to weigh how to afford it versus the problems they cause.

Fear isn't the word I think we want though, fear seems too normal. Terror sounds closer to what they likely need to feel before things get better.

[–] TipRing 114 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

The public reaction is what scares them. They are entirely disconnected from the consequences their actions impose on the public and can't imagine why their "customers" would be cheering the death of their peer. They don't think Brian Thompson did anything wrong, maximizing shareholder value is a noble goal after all, so from their perspective the public just seems bloodthirsty.

[–] AtariDump 11 points 2 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago

Reminds me of finding out the taco bell executive used the phrase 'thinking outside the bun' in the I actual work correspondences.

To function in a big huge corporate c-suite level you must drink the cool-aid.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Much like how DC politicians live in a bubble where they think everyone in the US has grocery options and plentiful healthcare (due to how business around DC structures these things so those "leaders" just assume all of the US is like DC), the C suite lives in a tone-deaf rich-person bubble with zero comprehension about what it is like to actually live in the shitty world they orchestrate and manipulate.

Reading some guff about the Kroger-Albertsons attempted merger was case in point. These corpos said: "Oh, if we don't merge, we can't compete against Walmart and Amazon, and we'll have to close stores." Like, no? What business goes, "hey, so we can't compete with adjacent-market companies, time to close up the places that generate our revenue!"

Or the recent Congressional vote to spend THREE BILLION OF OUR DOLLARS paying telecom companies to remove Chinese hardware from their networks. Something they were told to do years ago. The same carriers that will continue to raise our service rates every few months are making us (via Congress) pay them OUR money to do what they should have done themselves years ago.

None of these morons get it, they just keep corrupting their way to profits off of our backs, while digging out the ground we stand on from underneath us.

[–] Wogi 16 points 6 hours ago

Are we not?

I am.

[–] cabron_offsets 28 points 7 hours ago

Good, good.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

so they're going to spend a whole bunch of the companies money on security firms, it's definitely going to come out of the executive compensation and not the workers, right? .....right?

[–] PriorityMotif 30 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't dn't see how that's profitable. If I were on the board I would just make sure their life insurance was paid up. Management is completely disposable. If they die, then you just get a new one, plus the insurance payout.

[–] grue 8 points 5 hours ago

I'm sure most shareholders would agree with you.

The trouble is that most shareholders own their shares through mutual funds in their retirement accounts, and those shares get voted by the fund managers at Vanguard/Black Rock/Fidelity/etc. Those people definitely are part of the good ol' boys club and will definitely vote in the executives' interest and against their clients'.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 hours ago

Ha! They'll take it from the workers AND raise the prices of whatever products they're selling then pass the cost onto us for a tidy bit of extra profit. The leeches have to suck as much blood out of us as possible.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 hours ago

Owners have to make these officers feel secure again... so we will pay for the security... they can't have their comp cut just because some hero murdered their peer.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 9 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

If you listen to the news segment, it talks about security completely and not about chnaging the corporate zeitgeist around the priority balance between workers, customers, and shareholders.

Hear that whooshing sound?

[–] chilicheeselies 3 points 2 hours ago

The revolution will not be televised

[–] peopleproblems 4 points 5 hours ago

It's sort of funny. All they are going to do is isolate the bastards into doing even more corrupt shit.

They really refuse to believe that the first part of finding out, is fucking around.

The more they fuck around and put profit ahead of everything, the more finding out I imagine is going to occur.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 hours ago

Right? No introspection at all. I doubt the C-suite of Patagonia sees a need to increase security.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 9 hours ago (8 children)

I'm pretty sure that was part of the point.

Legally, the murder was wrong. Full stop. There's no legal argument here that it wasn't. It may not have been the guy they caught, but someone was murdered and legally that's wrong.

Morally though, it's a lot more gray. It's pretty easy to prove that health insurers policies have literally been killing people thousands of people a year at at a minimum and even if it's legal for some reason, that's also still morally wrong. Attacking someone who's attacking other people is usually called defending.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Legally, the murder was wrong. Full stop.

¡Hey Buddy! That's for a jury to decide

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Not really. The jury will decide if this particular person is guilty or not, but either way a man was murderer and that's an illegal action by whomever did it.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 43 points 8 hours ago (8 children)

The CEO was on his way to implement policies that would kill thousands of people, and injure tens of thousands.

I see no moral gray area.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 hours ago (6 children)

Legally, the murder was wrong. Full stop.

True but this was self defense. I don't see murder. Murder is the terminology of the regime who is trying to pin some crime on him that I don't see.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] cheese_greater 7 points 8 hours ago

When peaceful and effective protest are a choose1, gotta go with effective. If anything, it seems to me to be little different to the trolley problem.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

Just as planned.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 hours ago

People creating barbaric conditions are afraid of barbarians?

[–] whotookkarl 8 points 7 hours ago

As scared as someone denied necessary medical therapy, surgery, prescriptions?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 hours ago

Good. I hope they feel the need to look over their shoulders every two seconds. I hope they lie awake in bed at night questioning every noise outside. I hope they'll home cook every meal themselves from now on.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

"The avalanche has started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote."

[–] TrickDacy 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Kosh is very judgy, the hypocrite.

load more comments
view more: next ›