this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
209 points (92.0% liked)

News

23740 readers
5094 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ensign_Crab 85 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Right. Democrats putting up a fight. Sure.

[–] prof_wafflez 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

lol yeah what the hell is that headline? Some democrats are already turning against the trans community 🙄

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

They're going to really show Trump how unfair he is being, appeal to his better nature, and make him feel bad so he changes his ways. They may even point out how he's not following the rules as they're normally interpreted. For sure it will work this time. There's no way he can survive this.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Woah, woah, woah! They're also going to point out how he's not following norms...

[–] BlitzoTheOisSilent 3 points 1 month ago

Guess the gloves are coming off, god damn...

[–] Sam_Bass 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

what better nature? He ain't got one

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] finitebanjo 77 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Well they lost majority so fat chances.

[–] credo 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They are going to TP his chair.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Someone's going to sneak a fart bag on his chair right before he sits down, and everyone will laugh at him!

[–] normalexit 5 points 1 month ago

Classic democrat pranksters!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] njm1314 50 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 month ago

On any GOP-only legislation, there is "going to be enormous pressure" on Republican centrists to break away, said Rep. Joe Morelle (D-N.Y.)

Dudes living in a dream world.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This reeks from industrial levels of Copeium completely untethered to the new reality which faces the 119th Congress, when The Supreme Court is still controlled by Republicans, both houses are controlled by Republicans and Donald Trump is once again the President. This is publishing for the sake of publishing, it should not be construed as anything you can hang your hat on.

[–] bassomitron 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

To be fair, they controlled both the House and the Senate in 2016, too. They didn't have the courts, yet, but they soon did. And they still barely agreed on anything.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, the GOP is weird because they are all on the same page in terms of talking points (disinformation) and voter suppression, but once they get in power none of them can agree, and none of them take it seriously.

[–] VindictiveJudge 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because you have two primary camps there right now - the corpocratic old guard and the nationalistic new guard. The nationalists were never actually supposed to have power, they were just meant to be an easily manipulable voter base. It's not even the first time they've had an 'inmates running the asylum' situation because the exact same thing happened with racists when they tried the Southern Strategy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I think we also got a taste of this with the Tea Party movement on the Right. They wanted to break everything and cared very little about actually governing. It's about hurting people and sowing bad faith discourse.

[–] njm1314 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's a much different GOP this time around. Before Trump was the new guy. The Outsider. This time he is the party. This time everyone has to kiss his ring and owes their entire power base to him.

[–] FlowVoid 2 points 1 month ago

This time they have to decide who among them will take his mantle in 2028. Whoever it is needs to be ready in 2027, so the hunger games are starting sooner than you think.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

"We really, really mean it this time."

[–] PugJesus 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Doubt. The House isn't the Senate, the minority can't do shit.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

The senate minority cant do shit either. The senate filibuster rules are enforced by the parliamentarian, who the vice president can overrule. Doesn't even need to abolish filibuster

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

I hope they all use the men's room. All of them.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

Freddie The Lobster says: “Just Wait 'Til I Get These Fucking Rubber Bands Off"

[–] FlyingSquid 13 points 1 month ago

Oh bless their hearts, they think they hold power.

[–] AshMan85 12 points 1 month ago

Awesome, glad you decided to do your job after throwing the fight

[–] oakey66 11 points 1 month ago

Wishful fucking thinking.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"#DemsDontDeliver"

[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke 8 points 1 month ago

I'm not gonna believe it unless he cries on tv

[–] TropicalDingdong 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

With what leverage? They could take Lemmy's advice and get deep into beans so that they are gassy all the time, but beyond farting and stinking the place up, the cake is baked.

[–] Rapidcreek 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

narrator: they should, but in no way will be able to

[–] Rapidcreek 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As with the last congress, the new one will have very slim margin and Johnson will need Democrats to get anything done.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I believe we will find, that with no firewalls, and no checks to Trump unmitigated threat of revenge, we will see any Republicans stand up to him again. You're thinking in terms of present day back to 2016 when Trump's win was a surprise, and he didn't know where the buttons on the dash were yet. It's 8 years later, and he's got a team assembled for raw power, and vengeance. Let's meet back here in 12 months and discuss the amount of times Republicans were thwarted in their majorities, I'm pretty sure it's going we're going to have zero examples of "Johnson needing Democrats" for anything at all

[–] Rapidcreek 3 points 1 month ago

We shall see, but I've seen congressional Republicans described in two groups. Maga and hate maga. All it takes is three or so. Trump has already lost power in the Senate with the refusal to recess and Gaetz, and it's more than a couple of months before he's sworn in.

[–] WoahWoah 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

There's some things to be hopeful about. Trump cannot run again, so the republican party has no choice but to be thinking about what's next. Additionally, aside from the slim majority in the house, mid-term elections are only two years away. That means the Republicans need to thread a needle here by sufficiently pacifying the MAGA diehards and Trump, but not so much that they have complete reign over the direction of the economy.

Many in the republican party have become full-on cultists. But many of them also just play-act because it's where the power is right now. And many of them aren't in the cult, but they simply ignore it because it benefits the party. If the Magats are given no leash, their policies will almost inevitably turn the electorate against them. So many of Trump's proposals are good "tough guy" vengeance talking points that speak to aggrieved white people, but the election was closer than they are pretending.

If Trump goes on a full vengeance tour and his Project 2025 crew enacts their policies, the consequences of all that rhetoric will be devastating to poor white people. I know we like to think it happened during his first term and they didn't care, but it's not true. He was a fairly ineffective president. But now that he's got people around him that want to actually act not talk, there's a huge downside risk that they'll start losing power during the mid-term elections. If that happens, the last two years for Trump will be miserable as everyone jumps ship from the senile guy in his mid-80s that can't run again and is bleeding out the republican party of support.

Political pragmatics will force the republican party to turn on him. He's simply unable to wield much influence after his last term. He will be too old and have no political future. And that will be recognized and cause some political realignment far before his presidency comes to an end.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (15 children)

Trump can't legally run again based on our current legal framework. I think that's somewhat important to clarify.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why can't Trump run for a Third Term? Because the Constitution says so? Psh! When have Republicans cared about the Constitution (except when Defending people who Murder a Bunch of Children in a School!)?

[–] WoahWoah 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's theoretically possible but extremely unlikely for a number of reasons. There's a difference between bending constitutional intent by flouting democratic norms on the one hand, and outright ignoring what most people consider to be an explicit and core constitutional principle on the other. And, again, I'm not someone that believes Trump is ultimately heading for a lich-king transformation, so basic biology makes it even more unlikely.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Oooo They are going to write such a strongly worded memo!

load more comments
view more: next ›