This is not biblically accurate. She should be naked, since she doesn’t yet have knowledge of good and evil, and god considers nudity evil, because he is a prude. But also he didn’t clothe Adam and Eve, cause he’s a perv.
this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
539 points (90.0% liked)
Comic Strips
13419 readers
3368 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- [email protected]: "I use Arch btw"
- [email protected]: memes (you don't say!)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
My quip with the artistic choice is that they made Eve have very very long hair which could have served as breast cover. But they chose to add the inaccurate leaves...
Also bellybutton shouldn't exist on Adam and Eve.
or should it...
no, no, a birthing God entity is a gross thought, stop...
It's actually just for support, they're pretty heavy
And the bible never says the fruit was an apple
Given the era, I wouldn't be surprised if it was actually a fig
It's the garden of eden so there's no reason to believe that it's a fruit we have. My head canon is that it was a giant, fruit shaped flaming hot Cheeto
So it was a FIG-ticious fruit?
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(8 replies)
The comic is obviously of a theatre reproduction of the event.
To be fair they also didn’t have genitals since they can’t Fuck, so maybe they literally have nothing to be ashamed of.
Unrelated but they also shouldn’t have belly buttons because they weren’t born.
I don't think that interpretation, i. e. the absent genitals, is canon.
so NOW we're drawing the line?
today's kids have the wildest headcanons smh
I still ship mary and god tho
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
...then how do they have children? where did Cain and Abel come from?
...and where did all the people that came after Cain and Abel come from? Who was their mother?
Cain and Able weren't Adam and Eves only children. Keep in mind that canonically, Adam lived for over 900 years. That's a lot of time you can use to make more babies.
After the whole regicide incident, they also had Seth. Both him and his exiled brother ended up marrying their sisters. Their descendants did the same. So yeah, it's all incest, top to bottom.
The biblical flood was actually created to wipe out the descendants of Cain, since Noah and his cousins wife were both descendants of Seth
load more comments
(3 replies)
Bottomless but not topless? Eden was a wild place!
Just like Winnie the Pooh in the Hundred Acre Wood
load more comments
(1 replies)
This implies that the garden of Eden was in the US as they're the only ones that know what pumpkin spice even is.
Her wearing a bra even before having a bite suggests that too.
was going to say, she was supposed to be naked.
Maybe 10 years ago but nowadays it's internationally much more ubiquitous
No.
The "apple" was a persimmon?
Actually, the Bible just says it's the fruit of a tree.
It could have been an orange, pomegranate, or banana.
A nut, bit right through the shell
Weed, they got baked and leaned the knowledge of good and evil.
Pomegranates are one of the oldest cultivated fruits, so they're somewhat plausible, but I'm fairly certain humans made oranges (and most other citruses, through selection and grafting... though I guess it could have been a mandarin, pomelo, or citron, which seem to be the three we started with) and bananas (through selection and cloning), so it couldn't have been those.
Apples, on the other hand, seem to have existed long before humans, so they're definitely a possibility.
It was probably some kind of nut, though.
I've been wondering about this for a while, and I've come to the conclusion that blackberries are probably the original thing. Brambles grow like weeds all over Europe, I don't think anyone is cultivating them to be different. Apples definitely have had a human hand in selecting the best apples to start fresh orchards with.
I'm open to correction though.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
"apple" used to just mean "fruit"
Technically, they were naked before trying the fruit and wore leaves upon receiving the carnal knowledge and realizing that they were naked. Before that, they had no concept of covering themselves.
Correct, but due to American issues with nudity, this is always covered up with branches regardless.
You could just make their head hair cover their nipples and have them walk behind waist high sight barriers like grass or shrubbery. Just spitt-balling here.
Isn't it strange that the first chronological story of Christianity end with, "Women are the reason everything sucks." and yet some women are devout religious. Smh indoctrinated and brainwashed.
view more: next ›