this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
378 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19248 readers
2310 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
378
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by MicroWave to c/politics
 

Summary

After facing nearly 100 felony charges, including a historic conviction for hush-money payments, Donald Trump’s legal troubles appear to be stalling.

Jack Smith, the special counsel leading key federal cases on election interference and classified documents, reportedly plans to resign following Trump’s recent election victory, which effectively nullifies these cases.

Trump’s return to office, combined with Supreme Court rulings enhancing presidential powers, signals he may face minimal accountability.

This lack of oversight could empower Trump’s administration to act with unprecedented legal and legislative freedom.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Why did Biden go so soft on Trump? He should have been locked up after the coup attempt.

[–] Soup 96 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Because the U.S. sat at the table with nazis to try to appease them and now the nazis are in charge and the country won’t get a damn thing for trying to be nice because nazis.

[–] TropicalDingdong 53 points 1 month ago

Bipartisanship with a Nazi party means you just have two Nazi parties.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Soup 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

0% of the time it works every time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I like those odds

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

From what I've read, the concept of appeasement was buying time because Britain was in no position to do anything, which ultimately worked (I'm reminded of the quote "Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock.").

However it doesn't work if you're not planning to do anything!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

Yes see the Gaza situation. Appeasement is the Biden policy there

[–] FenrirIII 9 points 1 month ago

The Union did the same thing with the Confederate traitors and we're still dealing with racists.

[–] Viking_Hippie 48 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Because Biden is a feckless conservative Democrat who cares more about protecting the INSTITUTIONS of American democracy, such as the notion that presidents and former presidents deserve special treatment, than democracy itself and appointed an AG who agrees.

[–] WoodScientist 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Seriously. Lincoln suspended habeas corpus and had pro-confederate newspapers shut down. That is what a real response to a threat to democracy looks like.

[–] PlantDadManGuy 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I guess the modern day equivalent would be dissolving Twitter x, publicly hanging Elon musk, and actually putting Trump in jail. What a lovely dream.

[–] WoodScientist 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In regards to Musk, I would settle for having his citizenship revoked as punishment for his earlier illegal immigration.

[–] CharlesDarwin 2 points 1 month ago

Is Gitmo still open?

[–] teamevil 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Probably the best way to protect the institutions of democracy was to keep a goddamn fascist from running the country

[–] Viking_Hippie 8 points 1 month ago

Which he and his administration of course failed spectacularly at in every way possible.

He was exactly the wrong president for the moment.

The country needed bold action to stave off societal collapse and in stead, it got Mr Slow And Steady to reassure the owner donors by rearranging the deck chairs and shouting at people to stop complaining about the icebergs.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He's got a few months, a lot of guns, and not a lot of years left.

I'd have already picked the phone up. Executive action? You got it.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Biden could've used Trump's own tool - presidential impunity and either fired judges or plain locked up Trump or worse, first: forcing republicans repeal the law, two eliminating threat, and three - potentially painted as villain in history. I still marvel at how little Dems care for "the idea" and how much they care about their own bottom line 🙁

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Democrats only exist to be a paper opposition to fascism. They are fine with it because they think they'll be insulated

[–] UsernameHere 22 points 1 month ago

Because the propaganda machine made up of foreign bot farms, billionaires and republican “news” media has convinced half the American population that it’s all fake news. Oh and most of the judicial system is corrupted by republican politicians.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The justice dept went easy on Trump because it sets a very dangerous precedent for the current administration to use the power of the justice dept on political rivals. He was removed from office and his actions were investigated and displayed to the public. Under normal circumstances, those actions should make it so he cannot run again. The electorate are designed to be the check on political power, but it failed.

I fear elections no longer have that check. I do however believe the justice department made the right decision. I don't think it should criminally prosecute political rivals, because then we end up with situations like Nivalny dieing in prison. The justice department played it's role by exposing all of the criminal behavior, the electorate did not by allowing someone that dangerous back into power.

[–] TheEighthDoctor 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think you are confusing prosecuting political rivals with prosecuting felons

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I understand your frustration, and I think he is guilty of the things he is accused of also. I still think the justice department made the correct democratic decision of setting the precedent that the executive branch does not prosecute political figures when the electorate has a chance to make that decision.

I hate that the electorate decided that none of those offenses were damning enough to flush that turd, but that's democracy. He won the popular vote and it's up to those of us unhappy with the result to convince others that we need better leadership.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Compare to Brazil. They had a similar scenario play out with Bolsanaro. He was prosecuted and barred from office until I think 2030 for his stunt. It doesn't seem controversial.

[–] Veneroso 5 points 1 month ago

The investigations into January 6th and the classified documents were slow-walked beyond belief. Trump didn't even announce reelection until after the FBI raid. That was in August 2022! 20 months after January 6th.

If you or I did any of this we would have been in a government black site, not free to run for reelection.

Trump won't have the same hesitation when he starts his revenge tour.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

That's a removed take. If there's evidence of crimes then you go after them...

[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yeah. We don't have anything in place for this kind of thing, so we had to rely exclusively on things we use for corporate litigation and what have you. The whole impeachment, that's about it as for what our founders created to protect us and if Congress doesn't exercise that power, well this is what happens. That whole argument way back "the courts will settle this" from the Senate that gave him a pass, that was the Senate knowing they failed and trying to pass the blame elsewhere.

Trump got away with everything because the actual few protections we have, the people entrusted to use those powers lacked the spine to actually use that power. Cowardice is how we got here. A short but important line of defense was entrusted to weak minded people and so they failed at every step of the way.

Perhaps we will one day fix these shortcomings. Maybe. But this shows that if we give power to weak individuals that will put wealth, power, and their own interests over the rule of law, then we don't have a country. The Constitution is only a sheet of paper if we do nothing to enforce it.

[–] Dragomus 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What is lacking is anyone daring to make a fist and slam it on the table with the proclamation: "Enough of these transgressions! We stop them, prosecute and punish all of it now!"

But this had to have happened immediately in 2021, not the feet dragging and allowing court dates to shift 'till a few months before the election.

I refuse to believe that in case of clear criminal acts against the country of america the judiciary process can not be expedited and court calendars not be cleared for full convictions within a year.

I guess it's also part of why Trump was elected, he promised the common folk to be the one that slams his fist on the table in their name, alas he was hiding that it was purely for his own benefit.

In a way I am now settled with the thought that the US now gets what it deserves... Alas the downside is that the US ego will fling all that stinky business far out into the world and everyone is stuck with the effects that they did not choose.

All in all, it is a good bet Trump's presidency will expedite the downfall of the hegemony of US power and influence in the world, china and russia are rising up to lay their claim now.

[–] PlantDadManGuy 4 points 1 month ago

I can only hope that this clusterfuck will expedite the gruesome death of our two-party system. I also find it hilarious that Missouri literally voted to ban ranked choice voting, because of scare tactics and the average voter being too stupid to understand that it's a better system.

[–] RampantParanoia2365 6 points 1 month ago

I mean, Garland dragged his feet til they hit bedrock. That is why he's getting away with it all. If he had simply acted swiftly with urgency, like he was dealing with a domestic terrorist, justice may have been realized.

[–] stupidcasey -1 points 1 month ago
[–] DrSleepless 39 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Let? How about helped and fucking cheered on!?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Merrick Garland and Joe Biden let him

[–] CharlesDarwin 12 points 1 month ago

Old rich white Republican gets away with crimes?

pikachu.jpg

[–] werefreeatlast 5 points 1 month ago

For 10 years 😄. Well, maybe 6 years. Usually the last few years you probably wish you we're already gone or are already gone.

Either way he can't run away from destiny. If I live long enough, I will piss on his grave.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

or did americans get away with everything? not jailing pervy trump is just the tip. when will you ask for repartions from the nixon clan or reagan? you dont because you have no spine.

[–] cloud_herder 0 points 1 month ago

Hey I genuinely believe the legal teams pursuing holding him to just give it their absolute full selves. Proud to be an American because of people Jack Smith and their pursuit to justice.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

The dog and pony show was gonna end election day regardless of who won.