this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024

768 points (99.0% liked)

THE POLICE PROBLEM

2511 readers

1836 users here now

The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.

99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.

When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.

When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."

When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.

Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.

The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.

All this is a path to a police state.

In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.

Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.

That's the solution.

♦ ♦ ♦

Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.

② If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.

③ Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.

④ Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.

♦ ♦ ♦

ALLIES

• [email protected]

• r/ACAB

• r/BadCopNoDonut/

• Randy Balko

• The Civil Rights Lawyer

• The Honest Courtesan

• Identity Project

• MirandaWarning.org

♦ ♦ ♦

INFO

• A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions

• Adultification

• Cops aren't supposed to be smart

• Don't talk to the police.

• Killings by law enforcement in Canada

• Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom

• Killings by law enforcement in the United States

• Know your rights: Filming the police

• Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)

• Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.

• Police lie under oath, a lot

• Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak

• Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street

• Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States

• So you wanna be a cop?

• When the police knock on your door

♦ ♦ ♦

ORGANIZATIONS

• Black Lives Matter

• Campaign Zero

• Innocence Project

• The Marshall Project

• Movement Law Lab

• NAACP

• National Police Accountability Project

• Say Their Names

• Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

jordanlund

[email protected]

768

Shot at him and put him in the hospital and police refuse to do anything until a lawyer was involved (slrpnk.net)

submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/thepoliceproblem

65 comments fedilink hide all child comments

He's finally arrested.

Minneapolis police are now facing heavy criticism for not arresting Sawchak before the shooting even though he had multiple complaints.

Members of the Minneapolis City Council, including Mayor Jacob Frey, pointed blame at the Minneapolis police department for not acting on any of the prior complaints against Sawchak and failing to arrest him immediately after the shooting. https://newsone.com/5658819/white-man-shoots-black-neighbor-minneapolis/

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 153 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Once again, armed white criminals have more rights than unarmed innocent POC in this country. The police likely support what this man did.

[–] 4lan 39 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

For anyone who thinks this comment is hyperbolic, never forget Nathan Pelham the Jan 6 insurrectionist.

When police came to take him in he drunkenly shot his gun at them from his home. Shooting to kill.

The police drive away and let him "sleep it off"

Imagine if that was a black man. He and his whole family would be shredded by assault rifles.

White domestic terrorists are being coddled by law enforcement.

Arm the left.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

It's a racist institution. It stopped being good for the people decades ago. It needs to go.

[–] kitnaht 140 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Just tell them he was smoking marijuana. They don't want to deal with actual violent criminals. Those guys are scary.

[–] UnpopularCrow 83 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Smoking marijuana, has a Harris sign in their yard, and supports the “defund the police” movement. They would be there in under five minutes with guns blazing.

[–] swag_money 8 points 3 weeks ago

agree.
although this intersection of the population isn't causing violence :p

[–] [email protected] 107 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

“He should not have been shot, but I will say this: We had no reason to suspect that he would shoot the neighbor from inside the house.”

The man who was being very aggressively territorial wouldn't shoot someone from inside his house?

[–] credo 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No, they assumed he would go outside first.

[–] tacosplease 6 points 3 weeks ago

They were really caught off guard by that and are frankly a little disappointed with the assailant.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Call me crazy, but if you point a gun at a neighbor for any reason other than being attacked, you probably shouldn’t be allowed to have guns.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Brandishing is a crime. The issue here is it isn't being enforced.

[–] modus 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

State laws differ and whether brandishing is considered a misdemeanor, a felony, or even a crime at all is going to depend on your state’s laws.

It's not a crime at all in my state.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Wait for real? I could just point my gun at anyone i want and there is no law that's being broken?! What state is that? That's fucking crazy.

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] [email protected] 74 points 3 weeks ago

I'm glad that, where I live, the racists find it difficult to get guns.

[–] crunchyoutside 53 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

MPD told the HCAO they do not intend to execute the warrant ‘for reasons of officer safety,'” the Minneapolis City Council said in a letter.

This... this boggles. This is almost Uvalde-level cowardice. What's the point of gifting military armored vehicles, gear, weapons, and training to police departments if they won't use them to execute an arrest warrant for attempted murder?

The command structure responsible needs to be regifted to other agencies that are bad at Google searches.

[–] freddydunningkruger 33 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, didn't you know? The police are under NO requirement to protect at the individual level.

The Supreme Court of the United States explained that it is a “fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen.”

[–] sorval_the_eeter 11 points 3 weeks ago

yes, they need all their tactical gear, cars, salaries and guns taken away if they refuse to do their jobs. Issue them some etch a sketches and chromebooks.

[–] someguy3 53 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

According to CBS News, Sawchak was taken into custody early Monday morning. Police said Sawchak had been holed up in his house for several days, but just before 1:30 a.m., he surrendered peacefully

[–] NessD 67 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Several days? Was this a siege? In any other case they'd torn down the house.

[–] TexasDrunk 49 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There must not have been any dogs or innocent bystanders to kill.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 weeks ago

Besides, he was white, which is code for "negotiations only."

[–] Nastybutler 19 points 3 weeks ago

He was white.

[–] EleventhHour 19 points 3 weeks ago

Even that shitbag realized what he had done was wrong before the cops did.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

With Christopher Dorner they burned the house down with him in it. Apparently the Minnesota police could use some training from California police.

Edit: /s

[–] nelly_man 12 points 3 weeks ago

And in Colorado, police blew up somebody's house because a shoplifter broke in and refused to leave.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrest_of_Robert_Seacat

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

With Christopher Dorner they burned the house down with him in it.

TBF that's less egregious than randomly shooting up cars that didn't even match the description of Dorner's car.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] ikidd 51 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Minneapolis City Council needs to take charge of this and clean house. Police aren't going to do it themselves, so the holder of the pursestrings is the one ultimately responsible.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah. Too little, too late. Send the DOJ. The City Council should separately be investigated.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] chuckleslord 12 points 3 weeks ago

Frey has vetoed any attempt to hold their feet to the fire.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 41 points 3 weeks ago

Vengeance is what happens when the system doesn't provide justice.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 weeks ago

WHAT THE FUCK

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This is how you get people to engage in "self help." i.e. "I'm going to burn this motherfucker's house down with him inside."

[–] NotBillMurray 26 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, my initial reaction was "well if he's willing to shoot me I might as well shoot back". But thinking about it, I'm a white cis man, I can't imagine being in a situation like that and knowing that if I did retaliate I would more than likely be the one persecuted by the police.

[–] Nuke_the_whales 6 points 3 weeks ago

Just disappear him. You don't know shit. No evidence of anything

[–] riodoro1 31 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

America is such a racist fucking shithole. Literally 3rd world level of prejudice. If not trump it’s gonna be someone else in four years. Idiotic societies end up with totalitarianism.

That’s what you get for pretending the issue is solved instead of actually solving it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

A nation founded on the genocide of the natives, which never accepted its roots on a base level.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] RangerJosie 23 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Pointing guns at people is an exceptionally great way to get fuckin' shot. I can think of no better way to all but guarantee you get shot than to point a gun at someone else.

[–] Dasus 30 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

Yeah that made me have a thought. John Oliver did an episode on "stand your ground" ages ago, and reading that guy's message, asking "what he can do", I'm forced to conclude that for him, in the US, in that situation, it would probably be best to get a gun himself and the next time the guy does something like this, just two to the chest.

Seeing he has a restraining order and whatnot previous things, probably should be somewhat of an easy case to defend as self-defense, right? Unless it's just even fucking sadder, and it is just because he's black and he'd just end up imprisoned for murder.

God the world is shit nowadays where shall we congregate a force to have a teensy weensy global revolution?

[–] NikkiDimes 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Unfortunately, that would probably just result in him drowning in legal fees. Killing someone, even if it is completely justifiable in self-defense, is extremely expensive. Like, 6 figures expensive. That said, this man is going to fucking kill him so....also I guess even if he doesn't, now he has medical fees anyway.

Jesus Christ what an all around fucked situation :(

[–] bcgm3 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

... for him, in the US, in that situation, it would probably be best to get a gun himself and the next time the guy does something like this, just two to the chest. ... Seeing he has a restraining order and whatnot previous things, probably should be somewhat of an easy case to defend as self-defense, right? Unless it's just even fucking sadder, and it is just because he's black and he'd just end up imprisoned for murder.

"Imprisoned for murder" might still be on the optimistic side of potential outcomes... He could well be murdered himself, by the police, in reponse to what you and I see as self-defense. (I am guessing from the "in the US" part of your comment and other context that you aren't from here, and may not be aware of the history of institutionalized racism that would make any interaction with the police potentially dangerous for him. Forgive me if I have erred there.)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

Imprisoned for murder

Imprisoned for self defense while black.

It's a similar problem as driving while black, walking while black, etc...

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (6 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Plague_Doctor 19 points 3 weeks ago

Astounded by the mental gymnastics to say that after this person brandished a knife from inside his home saying he'll kill someone, the police couldn't imagine he'd shoot someone from the vantage point of his home. Incredible.

[–] WoahWoah 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

"We had no reason to suspect he would shoot the victim from inside his house."

Um. OK. Finish that thought?

"We just assumed, after repeated threats to do so, he would shoot him from outside his house, so you can see where our confusion arose. When he shot from inside, we didn't know that to do. Who would? Is it even illegal to shoot your neighbors, if you do it while inside your house? Truly a question for the ages. We had to consult attorneys about this. They said that while it's probably perfectly legal, we should probably take him in for questioning just in case.

But, again, given this completely novel new concept of shooting from -- and I want to repeat this so everyone sees why this was so confusing for us -- inside his house, we worried for the safety of our officers, because we have no training for something this radically different. Fortunately the poor fellow did walk outside, and we of course immediately arrested him. He was outside his house at that point, you see?"

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] SpiceDealer 11 points 3 weeks ago

From the article:

Minnesota Senator Omar Fateh also called out MPD, demanding an independent investigation.

What are the chances of that "independent investigation" going nowhere due to "external factors"?

load more comments