this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
214 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19143 readers
2489 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"A Maryland Republican who leads a right-wing coalition in Congress says North Carolina’s legislature should consider awarding Electoral College votes to former President Donald Trump before citizens’ votes are counted, according to Politico.

Rep. Andy Harris, the chairman of the Freedom Caucus, made the comments at a dinner on Thursday, saying the idea “makes a lot of sense” because the western part of the state, a rural area where Trump is popular, is still dealing with the impact of Hurricane Helene."

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“It’s profoundly antidemocratic to take the right to vote for president away from the people,” said Justin Levitt, a professor at Loyola Law School who worked for the Department of Justice under Barack Obama and as a voting rights advisor for Joe Biden. “It seems like an idea prompted by panic, rather than allowing the people to express their voice.”

There's no panic. It's just an opportunistic lie to remove any chance of Harris winning. Cause they're fucking liars and cheaters.

[–] grue 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The number of people still giving the fascists benefit of the doubt when they should fucking know better is too damn high!

[–] RagingRobot 23 points 1 month ago

Especially the fucking news.

They cover those trump rallies like they are fun parties. Then are sure to repeat all of his lies. It's ridiculous. The news every night is like "such and such happens. Then trump said...." As if what he says is equally as important as what actually happened.

They reported on him trying to overturn the last election live on every single network then just continue to cover him like that never happened. Infuriating

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 month ago

If you ever find yourself advocating against voting deciding elections in favor of your own personal opinion trumping all others, you might just be a fascist. Of course, he'd probably take that as a complement.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean we could take the honest route and try to give people there ways to vote even with the conditions they're in...or we can just use them as a crisis for political gain. Which would a Republican do? Oh, I see.

[–] jordanlund 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Give everybody mail in ballots and drop boxes so all votes get counted...

Oh, wait...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Just have to watch the drop boxes to make sure no one lights them on fire.

[–] Myxomatosis 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And I want to retire at 38 and marry Aubrey Plaza. Fuck off, clown.

[–] halcyoncmdr 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even suggesting this should mean he never works in politics again as it is clearly illegal and against the will of the people. But we know that's never gonna fucking happen since the Republicans love to ignore our electoral structure when they don't like it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

What's with all you people always making things about politics every time a politician says something politically alarming? Can't you see it was a joke or not that big of a deal or not meant to upset people?

Why would you threaten a politician's career just because they were threatening to sabotage an election by leveraging the current chaos due to lacking resources after a natural disaster? You know, the chaos caused by insufficient disaster relief funds after people like Andy Harris forced approval of lower than necessary funds.

\s except for that last sentence. Fuck this unqualified asshole.

[–] dhork 28 points 1 month ago

Ooh, they're scared.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

Subverting the will of the people "makes a lot of sense" says fascist from another state.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm from this state but I want to control another state's politics because that is normal /s

[–] jordanlund 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

See: Lindsey Graham and Georgia. ;)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Great example! See this for example with him...

[–] Hobbes_Dent 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is so absurd I can’t even be witty about it.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 5 points 1 month ago

Nazis kill humor, we don't let them win.

Go to darker places :D

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

RIP satire. :(

[–] barsquid 20 points 1 month ago

"When we Repubs deliberately block voters from voting the nation must accept those results. But if that same thing happens because of a climate disaster we must reject those results. Unless the climate disaster hits a blue area, in which case we must accept the results."

[–] Nastybutler 13 points 1 month ago

Any excuse to impose their Christo fascist agenda and put their orange fuerer on the throne

[–] fox2263 13 points 1 month ago

That’s not very freedom of them

[–] Maggoty 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If someone was smart they would have asked the 101st to dust off the old 2003 Iraqi voting procedures. They're there and they have that knowledge base squirreled away somewhere. But no, instead we're just going to assume things.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's early, I misread that as 501st and thought "what are bunch of stormtroopers going to do about it? Order 66 the guy?"

[–] Maggoty 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean... Don't get the actual 501st excited. :)

[–] Etterra 5 points 1 month ago