this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
712 points (98.4% liked)

unions

1453 readers
229 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DoYouNot 159 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This is exactly why we need unions. Just like not having weekends off, it's normal until it isn't.

[–] doingthestuff 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've been working 40 years, I have never had weekends off.

[–] RegalPotoo 31 points 2 months ago

Oh man that's rough, I'm sorry you've not had that. I hope you've managed to find other opportunities to spend time with family or do things that you enjoy

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Some industries are weekend industries; for Hospitality, Retail and Tourism, Saturday and Sunday are the equivalent of Monday and Tuesday for the 9-5 crowd.

That said, Monday and Tuesday are usually the Saturday and Sunday for these workers. Us “Normies” don’t usually particle in fine dining, clubbing or tourist traps on Monday and Tuesdays.

You are right though, Retail and Hospitality workers do need to get better unions so they can get paid a living wage and aren’t being forced to work 7 days a week for 12 hour shifts.

[–] [email protected] 155 points 2 months ago (17 children)
[–] Im_old 15 points 2 months ago

I'm gonna steal this, it's beautiful!

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 133 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He'll fire workers... what workers exactly? As far as I can tell, he hasn't actually run a business in 25 years. He got rich when Mattel bought his company in 1999, but then they fired him. He invested in a storage facility company, was on the board of directors but never actually had any employees reporting to him, and then he sold that investment, making him more money.

Since then, he's had a number of vanity projects name after himself: O'Leary Funds, O'Leary Ventures, O'Leary Books, O'Leary Fine Wines, I don't know if any of them are still in business, but if they are, I can't imagine he has more than a handful of employees.

Now he's just a reality TV personality, so of course he's going to say bullshit that gets him in the spotlight.

Why would anybody take advice from a reality TV personality who hasn't managed any employees in a quarter of a century? Especially given that he's probably just saying bullshit to get his name in the spotlight again.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is guy's grift is playing daddy capitalist while real owners do actual capitalism.

A useful whore for the regime.

[–] RestrictedAccount 10 points 2 months ago

So, real life capitalism.

People born on Third Base who think they hit a triple making demands.

[–] [email protected] 108 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Boss announces he will break the law.

[–] xantoxis 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why can't these regulations be actual crimes, with criminal consequences for the perpetrator. And if he's ordering someone else to do the firing, it's "conspiracy to commit regulatory fraud".

[–] okamiueru 20 points 2 months ago

It'll keep getting worse until heads suddenly start rolling.

[–] PugJesus 81 points 2 months ago

It's not about money. It's about being a petty tyrant and lording over the peasants.

Fuck the wealthy.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Wow, I would very much like to punch this guy in the face.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Alternatively we could just get whoever designed Lady Gaga's ridiculous meat suit from a decade back, get another one made, put it on Mr. Punchable Face here, and toss him into an actual shark tank.

That seems fitting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

German has a word for this guy:

Backpfeifengesicht

(colloquial) a punchable face; a face "in need of a punch".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wooki 42 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Up next on the news: abusive boss wonders why he can't retain staff. Should the board step in? Shareholders say yes

[–] whotookkarl 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nobody should give a shit what another reality TV show host business marketing shill grifter has to say about labor regulations. He's the last person I would care about an opinion from on the topic. Not seeing a link, did the article also include a response from labor leaders?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thcdenton 37 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Shut up and sit down you big bald fuck

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What a fucking baby, when did we start letting children lead?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago (2 children)

He wants employees to have the same dedication that he has. The thing is, it is not our company, and we certainly don’t get paid millions of dollars. We have other things to do on our own time than making money for you.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He wants employees to have the same dedication that he has.

Don't be confused - he is categorically not as dedicated as he expects his employees to be, but far, far, far less.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ashamed this piece of shit is Canadian..

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Not if you ask half his province.

[–] Sanctus 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like an easy lawsuit tbh

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant 27 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This old asshole doesn't talk to his workers.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If it’s a new regulation to not answer phones off the clock, isn’t firing the employee for it illegal?

[–] icedterminal 22 points 2 months ago

Yes. But you can best believe they will find something else to fire you for. If you have nothing, then it's an easy case win for you.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Remember when this clown almost ran for Prime Minister of Canada and we all just told him to fuck off so hard that he dropped out?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

He's got the charisma of a dead skunk, but I somehow doubt he won't still involve himself with Pollievre somewhere in there

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago

He needs a baseball bat to the knee and a diarrhea to the face. It will improve what comes out of his mouth.

[–] Atropos 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Who dreams up crap like Kevin O'leary??

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

Idk who Kevin O'Leary is but I'm pretty sure he's not my supervisor.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

Do it, they'll approve my unemployment.

[–] EnderMB 15 points 2 months ago

If someone like Kevin O'Leary is pissed off, then it's probably a good thing.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

If you look away slightly from that picture, your peripheral sense of a complete fucking asshole will fill in the cigar in his right hand

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How this FTX pumper is not in prison is beyond absurd

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

This guy is the enemy of the people.

[–] robocall 12 points 2 months ago

It's so gross how the .01% love being villains to hardworking folk.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Tbh, if you're working that high up the chain that O'Leary calls you personally, you probably are a very wealthy workaholic anyways.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’m skeptical of the claim that this regulation “allows” anyone to do anything. That’s now how regulations work.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›