this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
248 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19194 readers
2909 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Exclusive: clip from canvasser for Musk’s America Pac reveals apparent ease in which GPS location can be spoofed

Donald Trump’s ground game in Arizona and Nevada may be undercut by canvassers working for America Pac using GPS spoofing to pretend they have knocked on doors when they haven’t, according to multiple people familiar with the practice and a leaked how-to-fake-location video.

The ramifications for Trump may be far reaching, given America Pac has taken on the bulk of the Trump campaign's ground game in the battleground states, and the election increasingly appears set to be decided by turnout.

A bootleg how-to-spoof video, made by an America Pac canvasser in Nevada and obtained by the Guardian, shows the apparent ease with which locations can be changed to fake door-knocks, calling into question how many Trump voters have actually been reached by the field operation.

The video, shared with a few hundred canvassers, walks through the setup: a user downloads a GPS-spoofing app to falsely place themself at the door of a Trump voter, fakes responses to the survey and takes steps to cover up the fraud by varying the survey responses to make it believable.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks 109 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So it's people being paid to knock on doors for trump. Lying about knocking on doors to still get paid.

At least this time the fraud is fucking trump and Musk.

Although it's likely this shit will be used to claim trump had "more voters than votes" but they'll claim Dems cheated no matter what

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Excuse my ignorance here, but what is the data that they're collecting being used for? We see polls every day suggesting that Trump and Kamala are closer in votes than anyone on Lemmy would like, but now I wonder who exactly is being grifted. Is this Trump being lied to and paying for a service he isn't receiving, or is this data being falsified to make Trump look more popular than he is, lending weight and legitimacy to his claims of widespread voter fraud?

I'd love, for once, for Trump's own philosophies to be biting him, but based on the past, I'm worried this is just another tool in the misinformation arsenal.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

This isn't about gathering data so much as it is encouraging Trump supporters to get out and vote, is my read.

[–] givesomefucks 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We see polls every day

Some polls are bullshit, but polling aggregators still use them.

So if you look at respectable independent polling, it doesn't matter at all.

If you blindly follow aggregators, then it would effect the overall numbers.

But from the article it's grifting from Musk's PAC, they're the ones paying for the canvassing that's not happening

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Well, the question here is - if they know the canvassers numbers are bunk, would they still try to use them? It'd be a way of creating more respectable fake polls, I suppose.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Although it’s likely this shit will be used to claim trump had “more voters than votes” but they’ll claim Dems cheated no matter what

This is the worrying bit. It will get debunked but they'll still make the claim and their faithful will believe it, and that will be a justification for messing up with the vote counting and the certification processes post election.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 month ago

Given that Trump-era Republican politics is ideologically about self-serving grift, one could argue that the canvassers who do this are the Trumpist true believers, and the idealistic shlubs who actually knock on doors because they care are RINOs.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 month ago

Campaign run by fraudster attracts fraudsters, news at 11.

Good for these people for grifting an asshole who has grifted so many others.

[–] negativenull 51 points 1 month ago

They have concepts of door knockers

[–] Rapidcreek 22 points 1 month ago

Fake knockers sounds very on-brand for Trump, though...

[–] Carrolade 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

When your entire philosophy is based around a more base, animalistic interpretation of human nature, is it really all that surprising when your own people take advantage of you?

We get more of the behaviors we role model to our fellows, whatever those are. If you role model being a little shit, then more of your followers will be little shits to you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Exactly. He's getting out what he put in. This is what he deserves and he has no one to blame but himself.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This doesn't hurt anyone but Trump does it? I'm trying to figure out the election fraud angle - it's really just defrauding Trump and his campaign for payment of services not rendered, correct? Not that it's OK if so (I mean, it's funny, but they should still be prosecuted), but how does this fraudulently influence the election (if at all)?

[–] ThePowerOfGeek 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

One thing this does is amplify the false narrative that the election will be stolen away from Trump.

These canvassing results make it look like there are more Trump supporters than there really are. It looks like it's going to be a very close race anyway, but if Harris gets a higher number of votes in states like Nevada or Arizona than this canvassing data suggests, then Trump and his supporters will ignore the prospect that their numbers are bad and will instead use these corrupted numbers as evidence that either a) fake voters are in the mix or that b) votes for Trump are being suppressed.

And this will then be extrapolated across all battleground states that don't go their way, not just Arizona and Nevada.

Edit: clarified a couple of sentences.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Great point, thanks for pointing that out.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

I think in a lot of cases this is just a big rabbit hole for anyone who wants to fix it or prove it even happened.

  • The best option is to start over and start canvassing again from scratch.
  • Proving and then holding someone accountable can’t be automated in a trustworthy way, so you’d have to invent that process and then run everyone through them.

Both of those are just expensive, in both time and money terms. I think it’s got to be damage control, and then maybe some attempt to round people up and find the fraud after the election?

But the bottom line is that it’s the PAC that shoulders the entire cost, for now, and the Trump campaign just has to eat the damage for now. These aren’t federal crimes or really even actual crimes, so any eventual outcome is most likely to just be lawsuits or legal threats against supposed fraudsters?

[–] mojofrododojo 2 points 1 month ago

he might be using the whole thing as a means of laundering money.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife 8 points 1 month ago

Almost 20 years ago I was friends with a bunch of Red Bull girls. Their job was to take the Red Bull mini cooper every morning, fill it up with cases of Red Bull and drive it around handing out free Red Bull any place they found people congregating. They would often just drive down to the river and dump the cases there and then go home and get high and watch TV all day. Red Bull seemed to catch on to how easy it was for their employees to do this, so they issued them PDAs with GPS that would track where they went all day. I was a Windows CE mobile app developer at the time, so they asked me to see if it was possible to spoof the Red Bull tracking app, which turned out to be ridiculously easy to do since it just logged the raw GPS coordinates into a plain text file once every 15 minutes.

I did this for a pretty obvious reason (they were all very attractive) and because they gave me cases of diet Red Bull which I actually liked for some reason, but I think I was also doing humanity a service by preventing at least some people from ever even trying that vile concoction. I don't think it helped the fish though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I don't know shit about american polling but isn't there a software solution that guards against it? I assume pollsters are given android tablets by the orgs, and that it would be pretty trivial to lock them from installing apps if someone is interested in that. Like, parent control with a pin code or whatever.

[–] Promethiel 9 points 1 month ago

Trivial, smart, and likely amongst the first operational considerations when "real" political advocacy organizations do it.

I honestly wouldn't be surprised if they had a BYOD policy and the "PAC" exists mainly in three forms: A hastily made app, Leon's drug fueled rants, and the media's overestimation.

[–] LesserAbe 6 points 1 month ago

What little canvassing I've done has been using your own device, and that was where I was volunteering for a cause I believed in. If the canvassers are paid and not ideologically motivated you could imagine tablets walking off.

[–] plz1 1 points 1 month ago

This is because they are paid for the canvassing, right? I can't fathom a reason why to bother with this, if not for that. Other than maybe some Dem tomfoolery to skew the ground game reporting, I guess.