this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
486 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2498 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Volunteer for Florida dems

Florida's voter registration deadline is on the earlier side in a few days on Monday. Make sure to register to vote! https://vote.gov/register

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] danc4498 217 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I will not believe it until it happens. Just like Texas. But if she does win, I am willing to bet it comes along with additional house seats.

[–] acosmichippo 47 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

in 2020 republicans went hard after the cuban vote. wonder how that'a going this time.

[–] dynamojoe 69 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I live in Miami and i hate to report that it's going swimmingly well for the GOP. There's a culture down here that anything even looking like it might be confused with a leftist policy is immediately labeled COMMUNIST and hated with incessant fervor. No one dares be seen as a Castro-fellating leftist scumbag so they're constantly virtue signaling how republican they are. Same with anything the Catholic church doesn't like as there are lots of Catholics here and they vote as they're told. The result is you're as likely to see a Trump sign in a million dollar yard as a broke-ass apartment complex. Spanish-language talk radio here is so far to the right it wants to harvest the poor for their organs and bone marrow.

If Florida goes for Harris I will be legitimately amazed. Thrilled, no doubt, but amazed.

[–] krashmo 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You can virtue signal about being a Republican as much as you want and still vote Democrat. Nobody knows which box you actually checked. I don't know how common it is but I'm 100% sure it happens. Politics and religion are social clubs for a lot of people.

[–] ripcord 10 points 2 months ago

I'm sure it happens, but it definitely seems like wishful thinking to think it happens often.

[–] rayyy 3 points 2 months ago

Top Republicans are endorsing Kamala Harris. The riffraff and out of touch MAGA Republicans still haven't got the message despite Dick Cheney endorsing Harris. Most mainstream Republicans don't have signs in their yards around my area this election cycle and will march to the polls, vote for Kamala Harris and won't tell anyone how they voted - it's a Republican thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Doesn’t FL have a significant Haitian population too? I wonder how the pet-eating comments went over with them?

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 12 points 2 months ago

Considering that 100% of republican voters shoot themselves in the foot by voting republican, any haitians who are republican would not be put off by it in the slightest. Trump is openly contemptuous of all his supporters. They thank him for shitting in their mouths.

[–] acosmichippo 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i’m no expert on haitian american politics but i would guess that didn’t change much lol

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Republican Haitians in FL: "Those damn illegals in Ohio"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean Florida happened in 2012. Texas I think was 1976. So I'm with you, just I'm feeling FL is a little more reasonable.

[–] danc4498 6 points 2 months ago

Ohio was 2012 too. It feels like such a different world.

[–] [email protected] 105 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Holy fuck. If she takes Florida and Texas?

God damn. It will be a mandate from the people lmao.

#VOTE!

[–] EleventhHour 54 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Both abortion and legal weed are on the ballot in FL, so expect a larger than normal turnout.

[–] Myxomatosis 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I want to watch DeSantis eat a giant shit sandwich.

[–] EleventhHour 9 points 2 months ago

That’s pretty tame compared to what I imagine…

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago (3 children)

If Texas turns blue, Republicans will blame immigrants instead of their unpopular policies that got it there.

[–] billiam0202 17 points 2 months ago (5 children)

If Texas turns blue, the 2020 post-election period is going to look like rainbows compared to what the GOP will do this year.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] smayonak 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The reason she won't is because of aggressive redistricting and roll purging by de santis. The polls are of likely voters. The thing about roll purges is it means people who thought they were registered to vote won't be able to.

In fact most states in which trump's minions have established control over the election apparatus will have a strong red shift away from the polls.

[–] teamevil 51 points 2 months ago

I know I'm one "not team fascist" vote in Florida that wasn't there for the last election. So there's that.

[–] TropicalDingdong 39 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Pretty big deal if it holds up another week or two.

Note however, that NS does not have them as being this close:

*Checking the other results in FL, this is a bit of a fever dream. Only engage with it if you haven't had some time for self-care this morning.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Keep in mind that ~R+3 is itself close and withing the margin of error of a lot of polls. Many of the swing states have had near D+3 margins in the average at one point

[–] TropicalDingdong 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A bigger issue than MOE is structural bias.

Here is FL 2020:

Dem's face a self-imposed structural disadvantage in both inter and intrastate models.

R+3 in FL should be read more accurately as R+6 or R+7 based on the best most recent structural bias measurement we have. The article is weekend whacking material.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

That's assuming the polling error goes the same way. That's not a given at all especially as many pollsters have made methodology changes such as some doing much heavier rural sampling

Polling error has gone both directions in the past. Dems were underestimated by polls in 2012 for instance

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Here are the actual poll results which the article helpfully does not link to.

Napolitan News surveys ask an initial question to determine the voter preference for each candidate. Then, a follow-up question is asked of uncommitted voters to see which candidate they are leaning towards. The results are then reported “with leaners.”

On the initial ask– the number without leaners– it was Trump 50%, Harris 47%.

This Napolitan News Service survey of 774 Likely Voters was conducted online by Scott Rasmussen on September 25-27, 2024. Field work for the survey was conducted by RMG Research, Inc. and has a margin of error of +/- 3.5.

I think articles like this based on a single poll which appears to be an outlier are uninformative, but I guess they get clicks.

[–] BreadstickNinja 10 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It's not that much of an outlier. Nate Silver is tracking Trump's lead in Florida across numerous polls at +3%. With leaners, this poll found +2%. Off the average by one point with a 3.5% margin of error. Which is to say, well in line with other results.

The article is sensationalistic and likely wrong in portraying that as a toss-up or close to tied. Trump won Florida in 2020 by +3%. A result that suggests he has a similar lead suggests that he'll win by about as much as he did in 2020.

Silver has seven recent polls that inform the Florida average. Not a single one shows Harris ahead. Trump has also outperformed his polling in both of the last two contests, so his actual lead in Florida may be greater than the polling average suggests, but there is nothing to suggest Harris is ahead or likely to pull ahead.

Trump is likely to win Florida. The race still hinges primarily on Pennsylvania. Harris is not gaining ground. The race is locked in essentially a dead heat, with a tiny edge for Harris if you believe the polls and a tiny edge for Trump if you believe he'll again outperform the polls.

I detest these articles and the conspiratorial side of me thinks they're planted by the right to encourage complacency among Democratic voters. This election is as close as they come and requires everyone to show up and vote.

[–] TropicalDingdong 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Trump won Florida in 2020 by +3%

Trump won Florida by 3% where the polling suggested he was trailing by 3%, to just sharpen that point a bit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek 16 points 2 months ago (8 children)

I think she’s got a fair chance of winning FLA, but if she does, it means she’s already won most of the swing states, so there’s not much point in investing the massive amount of cash it would take to win. But, like Iowa and Alaska, the fact that it’s this close is a very encouraging sign.

[–] TropicalDingdong 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

Winning FL would flip the entire table over. She's not remotely close to winning FL right now. The polls in the article disagree wildly from all of the other polls we have on the matter. Biden was 4 points ahead in FL in 2020. Trump won by 4 points in FL. Harris is behind in most polls by 3.

She's improved her postilion in FL. She's not remotely close to winning it. When the polls come in at +6-7 for Harris in FL, that is when she is now "break even".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Plus it needs to be a massive number to overcome the, "This was clearly altered we are not certifying send it to the supreme court"

Less because that would stop a refusal to certify, and more because it might be able to kick the Republican SC members into choosing to not hand it to the GoP in fear of retalitation

Can't remove them from the court. CAN shoot them

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Nearing toss-up status" aka Trump is still winning above the margin for error. Most likely if Harris wins FL it would be after winning PA, MI, WI, NC, GA, AZ, and thus easily the election.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

The leads in some of the latest Florida polls are now within margin of error of those polls

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It’s my birthday in November. Please, please, all I want this year is Florida. Shove any physical gifts you were going to give me straight into DeSantis’s colon. I hope they’re large and pointy.

[–] eran_morad 12 points 2 months ago

Homie, if she wins Florida, it’s everyone’s birthday.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

As another November birthday, I’ll combine my potential gifts with your wish as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rickdg 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Everybody talks about Florida man and forgets Florida woman.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

...this has given rise to the foolish opinion among people that there are no floridawomen, and that the floridamen grow out of methlabs! Which is of course ridiculous

[–] eran_morad 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

She needs to focus primarily on blue wall and secondarily on sun belt. FL should be an afterthought, at best.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

They are primarily focusing on the main swing states for president, but Florida does matter a good amount in terms of the senate though. It's a rarer somewhat close pickup opportunity. With Montana not looking as great lately we'll likely need to flip either Texas senate or Florida senate to keep the senate control. Or there's the close race in Nebraska where Indepdent Osborn could give us a 49-49-1 senate if neither flip and we lose Montana

[–] RunningInRVA 5 points 2 months ago

You’re on top of the Senate races. Good job!

[–] randon31415 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Remember: to pass the abortion ammendment they need 60%. If it passes, no way Harris doesn't get 50%.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] billwashere 6 points 2 months ago

How weird would it be for the Dems to lose Michigan and win Florida and Texas?

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 5 points 2 months ago

The poll in the article was in the field before the storm(s) but no Florida poll will be reliable for the foreseeable future. Half of the Tampa-St. Pete region is going to be evacuating this week should the Hurricane Milton develop according to forecasts. Parts of the state are dealing with Helene.

Voting isn’t even going to be predictable, much less polling. Committed voters will do anything to vote but a lot of people are detached from politics and are going to be busy with home repairs, insurance companies, or just not coming back.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

We can totally blame this on old pudding fingers

load more comments
view more: next ›