this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
512 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3571 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MushuChupacabra 131 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It's in keeping with the conservative idea of small government, and minimal interference in personal freedoms.

[–] partial_accumen 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, ovum are very small so this fits within the bounds of "small government" because we're governing small things. Why? What did you think we meant by the "small government" phrase we've been saying all of these years? -Conservatives probably

[–] FuglyDuck 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

“I want a government small enough to fit up your ass.”- Vance probably.

“So your for gay rights?”

“Wait… what?”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"I want a government small enough to fit my micropenis in" - JD couch fucker Vance

Source: me

[–] FuglyDuck 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I realize you’re joking, but he doesn’t have a micro-penis. He bought a very big one from fleshlight .

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

shifted away from being more anarchistic in nature to authoritarian. its going to see the split between libertarians (who are more anarchistic) and religious fundamentalists (who are more authoritarian)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] beansbeansbeans 6 points 2 months ago

The brain trust should streamline ejaculation surveillance programs instead. Ejaculation without a pregnancy? Right to jail. Right away.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 months ago (1 children)

FORCING your Daughter to tell the Government when she Bleeds from her Vagina is NOT WEIRD SMALL GOVERNMENT! DRAG QUEENS need to be ROUND UP and Jailed!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

ROUND UP

It's the little touches like that which make your comments so good

[–] IchNichtenLichten 46 points 2 months ago (6 children)

It's almost like they're trying to lose this election. What next? Virginity inspections?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't think you understand how many oppressive shitty people are in this country. The Taliban are alive and well here in America.

[–] InverseParallax 23 points 2 months ago

Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf of the Southern policies of Jim Crow as an inspiration for Germany's genetic policies.

We needed to finish reconstruction, instead we let the filth slime back into power.

[–] IchNichtenLichten 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I do, I just don't think they're the majority.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Thanks to the electoral college, they don't need to be a majority to get a Trump presidency.

[–] Volkditty 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Genuinely surprised they haven't called for jus primae noctis yet.

[–] IchNichtenLichten 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sounds foreign, they won't like that.

[–] skeezix 9 points 2 months ago

They don’t speak French

[–] InverseParallax 4 points 2 months ago

Please, they'd all offer their wives and daughters willingly.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Nah, this is due to their base's support being absolutely unwavering. This is a level of propagandistic control never before seen in the United States. Joseph Goebbels would fucking blush.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Early menopause? Nah, we think you have had 4 abortions this year. Prove you didn't or go to prison."

I guess we shouldn't expect better from the party of bad female anatomy, sex education repression, and couch fucking. Weirdos.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The party that believes that a successful pregnancy is proof that women weren't legitimately raped

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Todd Akin, Missouri’s Republican Senate candidate, sparked controversy with a claim, made in a TV interview posted Sunday, that victims of “legitimate rape” very rarely get pregnant because their bodies prevent them from doing so.

Speaking to Charles Jaco on the Jaco Report on St. Louis’s Fox station, Akin was answering a question about allowing abortions in the case of rape. He said, “If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”

https://www.politico.com/story/2012/08/akin-legitimate-rape-victims-dont-get-pregnant-079864

Todd Akin did apologize and then decided to make it worse.

In July 2014, WND Books published Akin's book, Firing Back: Taking on the Party Bosses and Media Elite to Protect Our Faith and Freedom. In it, he said that he regretted apologizing, because "by asking the public at large for forgiveness, I was validating the willful misinterpretation of what I had said." He also defended his original comments and attacked various Republicans for "wronging" him...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Todd_Akin#Aftermath

[–] Etterra 38 points 2 months ago

This is gross and weird, and I can't understand the psychology that goes on inside of people who are so lacking and self-awareness and are this messed up in the head.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 34 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Menstrual Surveillance Programs.

Menstrual Surveillance Programs!

Menstrual Surveillance Programs!!!

[–] skeezix 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Take off every zig.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AtomicHotSauce 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ok. Were there. We’re at THAT point in this shitty timeline. We need to start clearing our calendars for the next few years. Where’s everybody meeting?

[–] dual_sport_dork 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Right under the Tree Of Liberty.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] dual_sport_dork 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I've got my tricorne hat on and everything.

[–] nifty 31 points 2 months ago

It’s like they’re using an abusive spouse handbook to make policies lmao

[–] nemonic187 28 points 2 months ago

Well of course those perverts are ok with this.

[–] PedroMaldonado 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] edgemaster72 6 points 2 months ago

They're working towards making that a mandatory policy too

[–] inclementimmigrant 22 points 2 months ago

Damn that's a pretty weird small government stance to want to constantly sniff out menstrual blood

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Trump: anyone who can grab a pussy can be a pussy inspector.

[–] InverseParallax 7 points 2 months ago

His reforms of the FBI will be very thorough, they will finally take their original role as Female Body Inspectors.

[–] ceiphas 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Under his eye" feelings intesify

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Trump the period checker and chief.

[–] cheese_greater 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Probably likes to think of himself as more of the period ender

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grasshopper_mouse 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Guess I'll end up in jail or dead then because ain’t no way I'll participate in bullshit like this.

At what point do we start Civil War II? Where can I sign up?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Or people can stop voting these prices of human shit into office.

[–] grasshopper_mouse 14 points 2 months ago

Sadly, America has proven that it is full of dumb-dumbs and there will always be people who will vote pieces of shit into office.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

i don't know if the red states would object to the blue states seceding or vice versa, so instead we'd be looking at american interventionism 3: this time it's personal

[–] Rapidcreek 12 points 2 months ago

They are out of their minds

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

I don't know if I trust this program. Let's first test it by surveiling how frequently men are unsuccessful in creating a baby. /s

As proud as I am of my 100% failure rate, I'd likely feel uncomfortable with something tracking where, when, and with whom (or more often, what) I'm tricking my body into believing it's attempting to pass on genetic code.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

wtf? Is T.I. making policy for these fucking weirdos?

[–] TriflingToad 4 points 2 months ago

I can't speak for effectiveness myself, but there are FOSS alternatives out there for my android peeps.
All found on FDroid which (as far as I'm aware) is android only.

load more comments
view more: next ›