this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
83 points (85.5% liked)

Space

8524 readers
159 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] laverabe 4 points 6 days ago

reads title ... ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

reads article

Of course, this expected time-to-decay has only shifted from 10^794^ years to 10^790^ years

เฒ _เฒ 

[โ€“] [email protected] 90 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Clickbaity title. The estimated time until Higgs field decay has been changed from 10^794^ years to 10^790^ years. Presumably there's some tiny chance of it happening today, but practically we can just continue worrying about all the regular stuff that is about to kill us all.

[โ€“] somtwo 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Also, from what I understand, we wouldn't see it coming (as the decay would be spreading at the speed of light), and everything would be over before our senses could ever detect anything out of the ordinary.

[โ€“] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

So, if I'm reading it right, everything would just rip apart at the speed of light due to a change in mass because of the Higgs field transitioning to a lower state?

[โ€“] jewbacca117 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

ugh i was hoping it would be before this election

[โ€“] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's a huge difference, the estimate became 10,000 times smaller.

[โ€“] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It is, but there are still quite a lot of zeros left.

[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Itโ€™s like if I became 10,000 times less attractive. Same thing.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Is it more than 3?

[โ€“] pyre 2 points 1 week ago

it's still a concern for biden

[โ€“] Shard -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Its more like 0.5% difference.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Not really, the new value is 0.0001% of the old.

Just because the number has barely fewer digits doesn't mean it's barely smaller

[โ€“] expatriado 5 points 1 week ago

we'll find out who was right then

[โ€“] rtxn 5 points 1 week ago

Guess I'm not spending that Christmas with my family after all...

[โ€“] [email protected] 53 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Thank god

10^790 years

Dang

[โ€“] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To write that out in full: 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years. Which looks like I just held ctrl+v until it seemed suitably silly.

[โ€“] pyre 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

the question is whether you actually did that but i can't be fucked to check it

[โ€“] Klear 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I was going to say it's way shorter than it should be, but then I realised Alexandrite renders it wrong and it spills under the community info tab and presumably far beyond the edge of my monitor.

[โ€“] atocci 8 points 1 week ago

So close yet so far

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, I guess we'll still end first

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Vermin doesn't end. Even if you exterminate it, they'll just come back with a vengeance

[โ€“] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

Kurzgesagt has a nice video on vacuum decay for anyone interested

I'm a bit curious as to what time span exactly they're measuring here? Because it's not like the whole universe would die all at once. Heck, vacuum decay could have already begun somewhere. If so, it would propagate outward at the speed of light, which is quite slow compared to the size of the universe. If it's far enough away, it may never reach us at all due to the space between expanding.

In any case, this is all theoretical and may not be an actual thing that could happen at all.

[โ€“] AbouBenAdhem 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There is a theory which states that if ever ~~anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for~~ the false vacuum state collapses, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.
There is another theory which states that this has already happened.

[โ€“] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

God I can't wait.

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Donโ€™t threaten me with a good time, like the universe ending tomorrow. God, this timeline sucks so much.

[โ€“] acosmichippo 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Particle masses would change, along with all associated physics, as suddenly the lower Higgs field state means that everything has significantly more mass. To say that it would shake up the Universe would an understatement.

would this be enough extra mass to overcome dark energy expanding the universe and cause a Big Crunch? or would everything be far too spread out at that point for gravity/mass to matter at all?

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Quantum field theory conserves mass-energy, so the new mass is coming from the energy in the Higgs field itself. It settles to a lower energy state and basically transfers that energy as mass to all of the particles that couple with it. Since it's mass-energy and not just mass that generates gravitational distortions, the large-scale gravitational evolution of the universe probably won't change, as this just moves things around a bit. It's not creating energy out of nothing.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

maybe its what Hawking describes as epic sheets of force bigger then the universe slapping together to create the big bang and how it is probably not the first big bang

[โ€“] ulkesh 8 points 1 week ago

โ€œIn the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.โ€

Time to end it! Inโ€ฆ.how many years, you say? sigh

[โ€“] Etterra 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So... Not tomorrow then. Meh, who cares.

[โ€“] elbarto777 1 points 1 week ago
[โ€“] FarraigePlaisteach 5 points 1 week ago

That could solve a lot of my problems.

[โ€“] TropicalDingdong 3 points 1 week ago

eh good riddance.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago
[โ€“] vala 2 points 1 week ago
[โ€“] setsneedtofeed 2 points 1 week ago