this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
137 points (92.0% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2866 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Because Musk did such a good job with that at Twitter... "I don't understand what it is you do, you're fired."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 59 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Claiming to be able to make massive cuts without cutting national defense, Social Security/Medicare, or loads of basic government stuff (like the U.S. Mint, patent office, passport services, etc.) is how you know this will never happen.

Every conservative comes to Washington ready to cut whole departments and then learns the Department of Energy manages the nuclear weapons stockpile and the entire National Park system is a rounding error on a B-2 bomber order.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I bet if we gave the national park system some nukes they could secure better funding!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Fuck man considering park rangers basically live in the middle of nowhere on minimum wage? Fuck it give em some nukes and let’s see what happens.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Nobody will be trying to take selfies with bison anymore, that's for sure.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

This just in park rangers nuke city, reasoning "fuck off".

[–] captainlezbian 5 points 3 months ago

Meanwhile the current republican plan, project 2025, involves killing the national weather service and noaa. A lot of stuff the government does without people noticing either saves average Americans’ lives, money, or both, and those departments are both.

Round here in the Midwest the nws is the difference between a tornado being a massive loss in property and a massive loss in life. And their flood alerts and severe thunderstorm alerts are critical.

But that’s just lives, let’s talk to the supreme deity of the American religion, the dollar. Farmers rely on the nws providing free and high quality forecasts to all weather providers. We’ve got geostationary weather satellites thanks to noaa’s goes project. And that high quality weather data shared across everything means farmers know when to plant and when to water. That does more than just preventing famine, it also keeps food prices as stable as it can. The fact that food prices are only now being disrupted thanks to climate change, corporate greed, and supply chain issues instead of just being unstable year to year is a miracle of our weather monitoring system.

[–] Maggoty 1 points 3 months ago

Ah yes. But now the National Park System is squarely in the cross hairs of real estate and tourism developers. And we all know private ownership is far more efficient. They surely won't do anything to mar the natural beauty of our land.

^Guarantees ^do ^not ^apply ^to ^ghost ^towns, ^oil, ^billionaires, ^or ^formerly ^native ^land...

[–] [email protected] 54 points 3 months ago (2 children)

How to efficiently lose 44b ?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago

Really, it's been quite messy and drawn out. You can't even give him credit for efficiently losing $44B.

But it sure was effective!

[–] ChonkyOwlbear 15 points 3 months ago

Losing money is all Trump understands about business.

[–] Myxomatosis 52 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Elon is a drug addict who is high on ketamine all day long and has never worked a day in his worthless life. No wonder he and Donnie get along.

[–] CitizenKong 10 points 3 months ago

Oh, but they only get along as long as one doesn't steal the other's spotlight. They're both narcissists, and will quickly become mortal enemies as soon as that happens. Musk sees Trump as a tool to gain (even more) political power. Trump sees him as a tool to get the tech bro vote. I don't think either of them has real friends, or even fully understands the concept of friendship.

[–] just_another_person 38 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Trump just doesn't realize everyone hates the assholes he's trying to trot out as a positive to his shitty campaign. They really need to stop letting him make his own decisions.

"Hey guys, I bet you're all excited for our musical guest, so without further ado...NICKELBACK!!!!!"

[–] alquicksilver 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

Yeah, why use Nickelback when Kid Rock is right there licking his boot.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate 9 points 3 months ago

Trump worships the super rich and the fascist dictators, and is incapable of empathizing with people who feel differently.

[–] ThePantser 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I don't think even Trump would stoop so low as to play a Nickelback song.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Amusingly enough, Trump is so bad that even Nickelback don't want him playing their songs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Nickleback would probabaly be happy they're getting played again.

[–] arockinyourshoe 2 points 3 months ago

After the Conspiratorial Photograph Episode (ft. Kristy Swanson and Novoselic), I'm not so sure

[–] grue 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Apparently not, according to the sibling reply to yours!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Aka, the Nickleback joke ruiner.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Elon: Running Twitter into the ground Trump: He's doing a good job I guess Trump would know because he's the master of running businesses into the ground O_o

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Don't forget running Tesla into the ground!

[–] elbarto777 3 points 3 months ago

Please use more punctuation.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago

Has Musk actually worked a day in his life? He obviously hasn't been working for some years now, spending all of his time shitposting and propagandizing on Twitter instead of running the multiple companies he is somehow CEO of.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

“Agreed to fork over $50 million per month until trump gets annoyed at the smallest slight or misunderstanding and fires him by tweet when he’s in the shitter.”

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

it's pronounced Xitter

[–] Fluffy_Ruffs 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

His voter base is convinced Musk is a super genius. They'll see this as a brilliant move.

[–] jordanlund 14 points 3 months ago

Elon Musk... Super Genius...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

6 months ago I made a ridiculous joke about Trump giving Musk Texas.

This is literally worse than I could possibly imagine.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Maybe he'll run the government to the ground like he's doing to X.

The type to vote Trump would probably get wet at the idea.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, yeah, they all think they are John J Rambo and armed to the teeth ready for anything....until the diabetes medication runs out.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Everybody gangsta until the welfare cheque stops showing up.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I recently watched a small-time documentary by a YouTube person on life in the ruralest parts of Appalachia. Deep red places. He talked with multiple locals who estimated that something like 50% of them got by on "checks", which is their euphemism for welfare when they're the ones receiving it (mostly SSDI).

It was sad but interesting.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You don’t understand, they’re against the lazy ones getting welfare not the ones who are hard workers but haven’t been able to find work for ten years.

[–] jordanlund 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They're against the brown ones geting welfare. FTFY

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It’s amazing how they can take American’s jobs but also be lazy welfare queens.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

The classic Republican platform: "Government doesn't work. Elect us and we'll prove it."

[–] Theprogressivist 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Placing a billionaire to lead government cuts. What can go wrong?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Nobody needs food stamps or subsidized healthcare."

[–] CharlesDarwin 6 points 3 months ago

"Food stamps? Why don't they just go to their fridge for food?"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

This is PROOF that Trump CANT be Bought!

[–] vegeta 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I see what you did there. Making a sly comment about him ler.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

And Frankly I'm sure it will all work out fine

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Sounds like a good way to ensure it's neither efficient or economic. I've come to expect nothing less from Trump's policy suggestions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›