this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
123 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19148 readers
4401 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter
aidan
jordanlund
HLMenckenFan
little_cow
123
Is this thing on? Harris and Trump battle over hot mics at debate. (www.politico.com)
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/politics
49 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Negotiations over the Sept. 10 spectacle have hit an impasse over whether to leave the microphones on.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 104 points 3 months ago (1 children)

“We have told ABC and other networks seeking to host a possible October debate that we believe both candidates’ mics should be live throughout the full broadcast,” Brian Fallon, the Harris campaign’s senior adviser for communications, tells POLITICO. “Our understanding is that Trump’s handlers prefer the muted microphone because they don’t think their candidate can act presidential for 90 minutes on his own. We suspect Trump’s team has not even told their boss about this dispute because it would be too embarrassing to admit they don’t think he can handle himself against Vice President Harris without the benefit of a mute button.”

Lmao this is great. Hit him right in the ego. It’s such a hilariously obvious weak spot. I’m going to be a bit surprised if this tactic doesn’t work. And as to whether or not it’s a good idea: I feel pretty confident Harris would be fine in this context, because she’d just put her old DA hat on and refuse to take any bullshit. I’m an order of magnitude more enthusiastic about her potential debate performance than I was about Biden.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, pointing out his weakness and blaming it on the people closest to him obviously works. He trusts no one so all it takes is a whisper to pollute his mind.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Do you think he looks tired?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. He does. Everyone is saying it.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 5 points 3 months ago

More and more

[–] [email protected] 63 points 3 months ago (4 children)

It could be rope-a-dope. Harris demands something that Trump actually wants. Trump has no idea what to do.

[–] cheese_greater 42 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is a real thing. They want A until you express an interest in A. Then it was always B

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago

A classic example...

https://youtu.be/KX2WVIaVUGo

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's like dealing with an 'effin toddler.

How is this even reality at this point....jeez.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We're coming up on a decade of this. Next year will be the 10th anniversary of the golden escalator to Hell.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I remember talking to a friend of mine after he announced. We're both native New Yorkers who have watched Trump for far too long. Both of us are politically aware/active.

I told her that Trump was in the race and she told me that she didn't want to have to think about Trump.

Also, most of the crowd that greeted him that day were paid actors.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I actually think this is what they're doing. Trump would by far benefit the most from a hot mic - talking (shouting) over his opponents is like half of his debate "strategy" and it sadly usually works out for him. Even with courtroom experience I'm not sure Harris can wrangle him.

However, taunting him into accepting a more formal debate structure with muted mics and speaking in turns would take away his favourite move.

[–] flicker 2 points 3 months ago

They're going to make us watch a privileged piece of garbage shout, "No, you!" As a woman is trying to speak.

[–] AbouBenAdhem 5 points 3 months ago

The Br’er Rabbit strategy.

[–] Ghostalmedia 4 points 3 months ago

They’re trying to recreate the first 2020 debate. That was a disaster for Trump.

[–] AdamEatsAss 58 points 3 months ago (2 children)

We have never been closer to Donny using the N-word live on tv than we are at this exact moment

[–] bazus1 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Tim Scott would still be his VP.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Scott will say he gave him a black card to say it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I think he's more likely to go overboard with the sexism than the racism

[–] [email protected] 47 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Huh, I figured this was Trump looking to pull his usual antics, but it's Kamala looking to get him to pull his antics.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago

Certainly enjoying that her campaign appears clever enough to actually stay ahead of his bullshit so far

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago

Here's a crazy idea: no PERSON is involved in cutting off the mic.

They're on timers.

X you have 45 seconds to answer. timer clicks down and auto shuts off

Boom.

Nobody has to worry about biased moderation because they wouldn't let cheeto ramble weirdly for ten minutes.

And more importantly we won't have to deal with a fucking child doing the "I STILL TALKING AND LOUDER SO MY POINT IS BEST LALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU* on stage while 30% of the country cheers.

[–] Boddhisatva 23 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is probably a good call. In the debate with Biden, Trump gish galloped through every question without ever actually answering any questions. By the time Biden got to speak, there were ten or fifteen lies to respond to. Even Harris could be overwhelmed by the magnitude of that. She needs to be able to interrupt Trump as he lies as well as to point out that he didn't answer the question he was asked.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

If she laughs at him at all he will probably lose his shit. The Trump ticket cannot handle laughter.

[–] Wrench 2 points 3 months ago

That would only work if she actually answers the questions she's asked, too. My big gripe with Harris in her VP debates and interviews was that she dodged every question that wasn't in her talking points.

Maybe she can answer directly now that she's not deferring to the president. Maybe not.

However, she can still do the "disappointed mom if a petulant child" shtick without calling or for question evasion anyway. They are not linked.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This seems risky. “Never argue with an idiot. They’ll drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.”

On the other hand, vamping is his entire persona. If she can shut that down and emphasize how pathetic it is (without losing her own composure), it’s basically game over.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Her team wants it on, his team wants it off.

The expectation is that Harris will likely goad Trump into saying something dumb when it isn't his time to speak. Since she was a relatively successful prosecutor, she'll probably do well with a quick response focused to the public.

[–] givesomefucks 21 points 3 months ago (3 children)

But Biden is no longer running for president. And Harris’ campaign wants the microphones to be hot at all times during the ABC debate — as has historically been the case at presidential debates.

That's really stupid...

Article goes to say they want trump to interrupt Harris because they think if Trump is loud and keeps interrupting it'll hurt him?

That's what his supporters want...

I can't believe it's not trump wanting the mics to stay on

[–] ThePantser 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because he knows a prosecutor will completely destroy him and his slow feeble old man brain.

[–] givesomefucks 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So you think Harris wants them unmuted so she can interrupt trump?

That would just turn a debate (where Harris as an exprosecuter will shine) and make it a slapfight which is Trump's bread and butter.

You think Kamala's time in court was two people yelling over each other at a judge?

Or you think it was taking turns making a case?

[–] themeatbridge 8 points 3 months ago

Prosecutors question witnesses who will try to ignore questions and talk over you. So she does have some useful experience. But you're right, there won't be a judge to issue rulings or maintain decorum.

[–] themeatbridge 18 points 3 months ago

Biden doesn't possess the wherewithal or the demeanor to talk over Trump while he's spewing bullshit.

Harris does. She will interrupt Trump, she will get loud when he tries to interrupt her, and Trump will not have good answers to her questions. If she gets him angry and flustered, he will look like a raving lunatic.

I didn't think it was a good idea for Biden to drop out, but I'm happy to have been proven wrong about that so far. I think this is an indication that Harris is ready for the debate in a way Biden couldn't be.

[–] Rapidcreek 18 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Interesting that the Harris campaign is being reported to want the mics to stay on, which runs counter to what many have demanded as a requirement for debating Trump. That would mean she is less concerned with him attempting to talk over her (her famous "I'm speaking" line comes to mind), and perhaps more interested in catching him saying something she can attack.

As annoying as it is, and there is some risk, I think letting Trump rave and bluster might be the best way to go. Especially in the hands of a skilled prosecutor.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

These debates aren't about policy anyway, they're about optics.

Trump will lose his shit and prove how old and weird he is. Harris will I'm speaking him when he interrupts. The libs will gush. The left will moan. Harris's campaign will have sound bites for advertising.

It's not Trump/Clinton. Trump running three times now gives the Harris campaign a lot of info on what to expect out of him. And Harris can shut Trump down without looking elitist.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

The way he loomed over Hillary. Creepy fucker.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

This is a win-win for Harris. She can handle Trump in either scenario. She's going to exploit his weaknesses either way. By making the hot mic into an issue, it puts 34's aides on edge leading into a debate where their underdog is very bad at playing the part of underdog. Weird DonOLD will be sweating bullets and might even run offstage in a cowardly huff!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

This will turn into 45min of Kamala reminding Trump that she is talking now.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So if this is just reverse psychology, does it mean that the Harris campaign literally has to deal with the Trump campaign the same way one does with a toddler?

[–] homesweethomeMrL 8 points 3 months ago

a demented rapist nazi toddler, yes

[–] Rapidcreek 8 points 3 months ago

"Our understanding is that Trump’s handlers prefer the muted microphone because they don’t think their candidate can act presidential for 90 minutes on his own.”

— Harris campaign adviser Brian Fallon, quoted by Politico, on Donald Trump threatening to back out of the September 10 debate

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can we please have debates that arent shouting matches? Like, I know one of the candidates is crazy, but it would be nice to have a better formula to stick to next time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

As soon as the GOP stops nominating Trump it might happen.

[–] RattlerSix 5 points 3 months ago

This is so unfair. When is he supposed to shit his diaper if the mics are always on?!?!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Four mics, always on: one on each podium and one lapel on each of their asses.

Trump's so you can hear it each time Harris makes him literally shit himself. Kamala's so that she can run ads about performing a "clean" debate.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -2 points 3 months ago

Politico - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Politico:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/26/kamala-harris-donald-trump-debate-abc-microphones-00176294
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support