this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
142 points (86.2% liked)

politics

19121 readers
5299 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LovingHippieCat 138 points 3 months ago (49 children)

Real leftists understand the principles of harm reduction. Voting for Harris, as voting for Biden would have done, has the outcome of reducing harm compared to trump winning. Sure, there will still be harm, but it'll be less, and that's incredibly important. It's basically the same foundation behind how we need to help drug addiction. Although Harris will likely cause even less harm than Biden.

Chances are that the "leftists" arguing for the purity test of Harris are people who aren't truly at risk in this election. They won't have their basic human rights torn apart if trump wins. They're leftists in name only.

[–] Alteon 44 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It honestly feels that they are more like Foreign Agents seeking to cause harm to other countries than real "Leftists". I used to consider myself Far Left until I ran into rabid Marxist-Lenonist Leftists (see Lemmy.ML) and how 'left' I was was put into perspective.

[–] Eldritch 21 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Have you ever considered the fact that perhaps you are more left than they are? They will ban you from their communities for Horseshoe Theory should you mention this. But when it comes to authoritarian ideology as ml is. Though they'll swear up and down it's not despite every time it's ever been implemented it's always been authoritarian. Much the same as economic liberalism . But authoritarians are always authoritarian first. Anything resembling left or right is a passing thought at best.

[–] assassin_aragorn 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Have you ever considered the fact that perhaps you are more left than they are?

Interesting concept actually. I haven't thought about that before.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Remember a lot of Rednecks volunteered in Catalonia back in the Spanish civil war, and came back fucking hating fascists and so called communists. I heard quite a few old bastards refer to the Soviets as "backstabbing pseudofascists" because the Soviets in Republican Spain were purging anyone who didnt adore the Soviets. Though not a Redneck George Orwell had a lot to say about that shit since he also saw it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I haven't just considered it, I know for a fact that I'm farther left than an edgelord who thinks being "left" involves assuming the moniker of an actual historical freedom fighter as if to appropriate their struggles from the comfort of an air conditioned computer chair.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Eldritch 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

On, the, nose. There's a few I'm pretty sure aren't American. Not a Russian or bot accusation. And another decent contingent from States and areas so safely blue that they're just out of touch. And don't care about the possible damage they do. Choosing to virtue signal over trying to appeal to other people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] makyo 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is an important point - it must be really nice to be in a position where neither you nor any of your loved ones would be at risk with another Trump presidency.

[–] Mpeach45 5 points 3 months ago

I mean, I mostly agree, but damn the ultra-left marginalized white non-binary anti-Harris idiots who don’t care that Trump would be worse for Gaza than literally any other person on the planet are real.

Oh and also the libertarians (always white, middle class ones) who think anyone who insists on strategically voting is a “brainwashed sheep”.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (16 children)

Not to mention the basic principle of democracy: political parties have a tendency to gravitate towards where the votes are.

The Democratic party isn't a static thing. They will move further left if it gets them more votes. They move right if that gets them more votes. If the Democrats go further right, it's not to spite leftists screaming on the internet. It's because leftists aren't voting and screaming on the internet is meaningless.

Leftists that aren't voting are leftist that don't actually want any leftist policies implemented. They just want to complain about policies not being implemented while doing nothing to make it happen. If they actually believe in the changes they say they want they'd be willing to vote in as many elections as necessary to see it happen. Over the course of decades id necessary. Voting in zero elections shows very dedication for what they claim to be important.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (45 replies)
[–] Zachariah 63 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Very often, I get the impression these “leftists” are disingenuous. I figure they’re Russians agents trying to cause instability, GOP astroturfers, or trolls who didn’t get care and compassion in the real world and need to see professional mental/emotional help.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Don’t forget the ever-present tankies!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

Refer to the last point for tankies, I think.

[–] makyo 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And if not they might as well be because there is not a practical reason for any leftist to pick Trump over Kamala.

[–] Mpeach45 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

“Practical” is the important word in what you wrote. Some of these middle class purity test crew have no understanding about voting to prevent the greater harm.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ovalofsand 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's unrealistic to assume that that's the case for every single person who falls into that category. People come from all different walks of life and believe a great number of things. I'm not saying that impossible for any of these people to be how you guess, just that you're removing the possibility of people to exist that don't fit into the way that you think.

[–] Zachariah 3 points 3 months ago

My list wasn’t exhaustive.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xanis 57 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I've noticed one very important detail:

Nearly all the anti-Harris posts are saying the same things in slightly different ways. When challenged almost none of them respond.

[–] kitnaht 37 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, because we've let foreign nations litter our social networks with their infosec agents.

Nobody who is saying they'll withold their vote for Harris was EVER going to vote D in the first place. But don't ignore them; call them out on their shit.

[–] Cryophilia 8 points 3 months ago

Important point: STOP BLOCKING THEM. IT ONLY HELPS AMPLIFY THEIR MESSAGE.

Blocking someone doesn't silence them. It's just you plugging your own ears.

[–] cabron_offsets 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Harris 2024. Fuck the republican traitor filth.

[–] SupraMario 15 points 3 months ago

They could have "weekend at burnies" biden and I'd have still voted for the corpse over the turnip.

[–] Eldritch 34 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Well realistically, what's to be gained from engaging with endless unrealistic purity tests? Of course we should always strive for the best we can. But we also need to come to terms with the fact that a lot of people can't or won't

[–] Alteon 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

It's so frustrating that they'd rather block all progress towards their direction because it's not an abrupt enough change. It's also the reason that they will never get anything done, they are letting perfection be the enemy of any and all progress.

Edit: Even if you support some of their ideas, they will insult and ridicule you for not supporting absolutely everything they support. God forbid you want to start progressing towards a socialized democracy, it's either radical revolution, or you're a imperialist cuck. Rather than help people see their views they'd rather drive off any and all support. Honestly, they are the Alt-Left and are no better than the Alt-Right when it comes to discussion. You'll be banned before you even get a response to any questions you may have.

[–] Eldritch 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yep, it's easy to be a purist when you are insulated or feel outside of a system. It's a lot harder to participate, compromise, and more importantly show solidarity towards achieving a goal. That's why so many choose to virtue signal, and absolve themselves of culpability.

That's also how we knew they would immediately start to attack the next likely candidate.

[–] Cryophilia 4 points 3 months ago

I've said this before: if Bernie got the nomination, they'd quickly turn on him too. No one is perfect enough for them. The purity test is the whole point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] elliot_crane 6 points 3 months ago

You hit the nail on the head. The most frustrating part is in my circles I’ve seen this very behavior coming from the exact kinds of people who would be the worst impacted. In both cases with friends acting this way I asked what their plan is if p2025 comes to fruition, and they plan to “just leave”. Yeah that’s great that you have that luxury, but maybe pull your fucking head out of your ass and think about this critically for a second?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Yup, I was legitimately excited when I heard that memmy was more leftist friendly than reddit. I was sorely disappointed to learn that it was the stupid kind.

[–] Ensign_Crab 15 points 3 months ago

Oh christ. How much of this anti-Harris sentiment is actually out there?

Most of the progressives I've seen are delighted that the party is listening for the first time in fucking ages. The whole "purity test" narrative was shown to be complete fucking bullshit when Harris dropped out and progressives accepted her.

But that won't stop centrists. They need to continue the bogus narrative that progressives can't be satisfied so they can keep moving to the right, ostensibly to capture the votes of Republicans, even though they know that Republicans aren't reasonable and won't accept the capitulation centrists call compromise.

[–] assassin_aragorn 10 points 3 months ago

Oh hey they wrote an article about us!

[–] CharlesDarwin 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Some of the anti-Harris "leftists" are probably just trolls, bots and tankies doing the bidding of our foreign enemies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

“Certain leftists want a 100% morally pure option that doesn’t realistically exist in our political system right now. I wish it did but it doesn’t,” said Furey, who also shared his frustration on TikTok. “And it annoys me that rather than use their vote to make a difference in what ways they can, they throw their hands up and say screw the system. It’s a cop-out and completely against what we on the left should stand for.”

Bingo.

Is there a lot I don't like about Harris? Sure. So what though? The only other realistic option I have is so, so much worse on every single front. If I believe in making things better, that means doing what I can to avoid the worst possible options, and doing things that are effective. Voting Green, or for an independent isn't effective, not under the system we currently have.

[–] dhork 7 points 3 months ago

We're just lucky she is not running for President of Lemmy

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Premature optimization is the root of all evil.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm voting Harris, for all the reasons outlined in this thread, but damn it chaps my hide that this is like the trolley problem where the trolly will go down the 100% evil track unless you pull the lever to go down the %25 less evil track. Everybody in here seems to think we shouldn't want a better track, it's just not practical or possible to do anything better.

Is nobody else here frustrated that the only alternative we have to the orange fascist is a prosecutor that put countless brothers and sister into the racist for-profit prison system for having weed? This is the alternative that progressives are excited about?

I read a line somewhere -I forget where- but it was something to the effect that always voting for the lesser of two evils means getting the second worst possible america. Are y'all so pragmatic that wanting anything other than the second worst america is automatically interpreted as a bot, or a Russian troll, or a stupid college kid in a Che t-shirt that only wants to endlessly critique?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nifty 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Some of these “leftists” are conservatives who are afraid of the white supremacy rhetoric on the right so they cannot join the white supremacists outright, but they hate the gays, or trans, or don’t believe in climate change or something else.

I think the root cause is religion, I wish we could treat religion as a private thing and just remove its influence from public spheres in all countries.

Does it even make sense that someone else’s (doesn’t matter whose) storytelling or world origin myth should have this much public influence or authority? It’s unreasonable and borderline psychotic.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›