this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
89 points (77.6% liked)

politics

19222 readers
2639 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The poll, which was conducted from July 7 to July 9, found that 73 percent of Democratic voters "somewhat" or "strongly" approve of Harris as Biden's replacement. In an earlier iteration of the same survey, conducted from July 3 to July 6, a 66 percent majority of Democrats approved of Harris as a replacement.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 37 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It would be amazing if Harris, a black woman, beat the shit out of Trump. But how probable is this? I thought Kamala Harris was universally disliked across the board?

[–] PugJesus 41 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It's less that she's universally disliked and more that she's not particularly liked. In her most prominent appearances in the past 4 years, she's lacked charisma and not taken stances notable enough to distinguish her from the administration. She's heavily disliked on the left-wing of the Democratic Party for being a DA who laughed about jailing people for drug crimes she herself had committed in the past (possession), and not particularly popular on the right-wing of the Democratic Party because they're still racist, just LESS racist than Republicans.

She may be the best choice to go with at this junction, but she wouldn't be my first pick if the field was open. But the field isn't open, so we make do with what we have.

[–] Carrolade 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I do very much like one thing about her. In a race where we need to be hitting Trump very hard on the campaign trail, a former prosecutor should be extremely well-practiced and good at that.

But otherwise I agree.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

former prosecutor should be extremely well-practiced and good at that.

Prosecutor vs. convicted felon. Who wins? Watch our brand new reality show!

[–] billiam0202 7 points 5 months ago

I bet I know who the party of "Law and Order" will vote for!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (5 children)

And to that end, I think Newsom would be the safest choice for a pivot by far.

  • white
  • male
  • heterosexual
  • somewhat corporate friendly
  • a bit religious, but not too much
  • charismatic + GREAT public speaker

Reasoning:

  • the first three are simply attributes that make it easier to min/max voter responsiveness in a country that still has a lot of prejudices
  • the fourth is so the mega donors don’t just dig in their heels
  • the fifth is so the religiouses don’t just dig in their heels
  • the sixth is generally a good attribute to have in a serious political contender

We're trying to stop the fascists from winning. Anything else is (unfortunately, but necessarily) secondary at this point. Pragmatic triage of the situation MUST be the mindset with which the party is evaluating their choices.

Of course, the DNC is neither triaging the situation, nor being pragmatic about the candidate who can actually fucking win and stop the fascists, because from where I’m standing, it looks like Biden hasn’t done a great job at any point in his term of slapping down the Nationalist Christians + MAGA crowd (and friends).

[–] CharlesDarwin 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

nor being pragmatic about the candidate who can actually fucking win

It's been a long time, and I don't remember the exact quote and the entire context, but I remember Trae Crowder (the "liberal redneck") on Real Time just after donnie was selected by the EC and people were trying to do some kind of post mortem on just how the hell we ended up with donnie.

And Trae Crowder says something like, "....or do you want to fucking WIN?" I remember Ana Marie Cox looking kind of put out by the comment, but IIRC, it was about pragmatism. I'm pretty sure exchanges like that went on, in various forms, all around the country during 2015-2016 and they are playing out again...

If anyone has a link to that full exchange, or to a transcript of it, I sure would appreciate it, by the way.

[–] CharlesDarwin 2 points 5 months ago

Oh, and by the way I love the idea of Newsom, for exactly all the reasons you lay out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CodexArcanum 35 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, as an anarchist I'm particularly unenthused by "Top Cop" Kamala. I'm also concerned that people haven't learned the lesson that Americans are extremely fucking racist and misogynistic. I'll sadly be "voting blue, no matter who" but when the DNC runs these deeply uninspiring candidates, they can't be surprised at how the low turnout costs them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Skyrmir 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Biden can only use his quarter billion in campaign funds for his running mate Kamala. So the only choice is a Biden*/Harris ticket in November. And realistically no matter who anyone would prefer, you're not going to sell a new candidate before November.

We've all in this mess, so now it's time to grab the Go Joe, and clean it up.

[–] bostonbananarama 3 points 5 months ago (4 children)

This is simply untrue. He cannot give more than the maximum to another campaign, but he can give the balance to the DNC or a Super PAC to elect a new nominee.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Polls also say she would do no better than Joe.

[–] TokenBoomer 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (22 children)

So it won’t matter if she replaces him, right? I mean, if it doesn’t matter who the candidate is with polling, then changing the candidate shouldn’t matter, right? Like, why are we keeping Biden if it doesn’t matter who the candidate is? Theoretically, if it doesn’t make a difference who the nominee is, and it won’t change anything, then changing the nominee shouldn’t be a problem, right?

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Yes but she's capable of actually campaigning. Expectations have been clear since the debate. If he got right out there and started campaigning immediately, he'd probably be doing fine. It's becoming clear however that he can't.

[–] eran_morad 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I seriously don’t give a fuck who it is, just give me someone who’s likely to get to 270. Will vote for any D, dead or alive, over any R, always.

[–] return2ozma 3 points 5 months ago

Yes, we're all THAT desperate at this point.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Reee-publicans worst nightmare

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Good luck with that. All I know is I'm voting for whoever isn't Trump regardless of who else they put on the ticket. I'd vote for Biden's cat even.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Is prefer his dog, who has more proven battle experience. It will be useful in the next debate.

[–] RizzRustbolt 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

While Commander may have experience with biting facists in the dick, this particular facist may present a bit of a problem for the pup.

[–] Omega_Man 1 points 5 months ago

The peen matches the hands

[–] Toastypickle 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Jesus christ. Can we just stop? Biden's the nominee. Doesn't matter who else you could get to run because they'd get crushed. Yes, it's a terrible position the DNC has put us all in, but that's just the way it is now.

[–] TokenBoomer 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That would be my opinion too, if I were a Trump voter.

[–] undergroundoverground 9 points 5 months ago (3 children)

The problem is, you have one side whos worried their candidate might be too old and another who doesn't even care if their candidate raped a child and tried to overthrow their government.

However, for reasons no one can quite explain, only one of them is being called to drop out of the race.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

doesn’t even care if their candidate raped a child and tried to overthrow their government

It's right there. It's because his voters don't care. Calls to drop out from a faction Trump calls 'the enemy of the people', is a huge waste of time.

[–] bostonbananarama 3 points 5 months ago

However, for reasons no one can quite explain, only one of them is being called to drop out of the race.

No one can explain? He got on a debate stage in front of the entire world and looked like a confused, doddering, and feeble old man. Any party would call for their candidate to step down after that.

As for why Trump doesn't get the same treatment, it's because the Republicans are no longer a political party, but have become a cult of MAGA. Hell they have people holding signs that say real men wear diapers.

[–] TokenBoomer 2 points 5 months ago

Biden should make this case, when he’s not napping 💤

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I do wish everyone would stop pretending the Biden replacement would be anyone but Harris. Everyone being cagy about who the replacement is just hurts Democrats, because it gives false hope to people who want someone other than Harris and thus encourages those people to both push for Biden to leave the race while still not being happy with the end result.

It will be Harris, if it's anyone other than Biden. Period. Literally the only way Biden doesn't endorse her as his successor is if he dies, and if he dies she will be the incumbent president.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

I think she sounded great in her recent speech in Dallas. Presidential, energetic, refreshing. Started laying into Trump a bit past the halfway point.

https://youtu.be/I2XgM-XcYWo?si=mDrsYS3GX1_mDoqV

[–] disguy_ovahea 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Cool. So the best alternative is still expected to lose? Maybe it’s time to stop calling for a replacement.

poll

https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/president/general/2024/trump-vs-harris

[–] MonkRome 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

That's before even a day of campaigning with her at the top of the ticket, I don't think those numbers are as bad as you think. Trump has been campaigning nonstop for nearly a decade. Unfortunately Harris is not exactly energizing, but I bet she can pick up 2-3 points just by being normal for 4 months.

[–] disguy_ovahea 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That’s true. Although it’s just as possible she’ll say the wrong thing and lose points. Some voters on the left are quick to abandon a candidate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bostonbananarama 2 points 5 months ago (5 children)

But the current polling says Biden will lose to Trump, and he's been shedding independents.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] PugJesus 4 points 5 months ago

Fuck me. Well, we make do with what we have.

[–] RizzRustbolt 2 points 5 months ago

Dear Armando Ianucci,

What's it like being chosen by Apollo?

load more comments
view more: next ›