MonkRome

I've been trying e-books, usually when I find something I want to read it will say something like you are 38th in line. Minnesota.

Ha, probably not that advice.

There are other ways to grow high yield food without using pesticides if that's your primary goal. Like indoor vertical farming in a controlled environment. Recently some growers have proven this is viable and profitable. Pesticides in any form are bad for the soil, bad for our health, and decimate the bee and bug populations, which fuck with the ecosystem. Wasting resources includes our natural resources, which are our biggest asset.

Yeah I agree organic pesticides are just as dumb. Bioengineering pesticides into your food takes the cake though, you can't even wash it off. Not all organic growers use organic pesticides. I know several organic farmers and none of them use any pesticide, they accept the lower crop yield for higher quality food.

Psychology has come a long way in the last 50 years. I used to think like you, and even now maintain a healthy dose of skepticism, but therapy absolutely can improve your life. It's not much of a scam if it's working for most people. It's just not going to solve all you problems. If anything it just makes you more aware and better equipped to deal with your emotions.

Every book I try to check out has a 3 month to 3 year wait-list. Not exactly a convenient way to read.

Medications

Sometimes worse side effects than the thing it's trying to cure. Sometimes used to cure something that better diet and more exercise could take care of. Made by companies more concerned with money than your health outcomes. What's to be afraid of?

GMO

Nothing wrong with GMO itself, but every company using GMO doesn't use it to make food higher quality or taste better. They use it to engineer pesticides into your food, increase crop yields, and patent our seeds, for, you guessed it, money! Insecticides specifically can be neurotoxic to humans. What's to be afraid of?

Maybe you should listen to your mom instead of badmouthing her to strangers on the Internet.

People are so used to how bad things are they don't trust improvement, even when it's real.

Can you blame them, though? I can’t think of a single person speaking for young men who is also widely accepted by the liberal left - or however you want to define the "good guys."

There are plenty of social media personalities with massive followings that specifically aim some or all of their contents at men with a positive vision of what men can be. I watch FD Signifier personally. There are also plenty of articles showcase positive male social media personalities with millions of followers. You should have done a 5 second Google search before saying something so easily debunked. You can't think of them because you are not looking.

Even here on Lemmy, anyone slightly deviating from the narrative is met with extreme hostility.

Welcome to social media, first day? You'll get that same extreme hostility in Andrew Tates comments if you deviate from being misogynistic.

It’s not that young men are naturally drawn to figures like Andrew Tate - they’re being pushed there.

You're right, just not in the way you're claiming. They are being pushed by social media algorithms that reward toxicity and simple answers. That's not the fault of the lefts "groupthink" it's on those companies.

Saying people should say things a specific way is prescriptivist. Descriptivist is, language gets defined by its users rather than rules. As soon as you set a rule, you're a prescriptivist.

You said "of course not" and then ended with a prescriptivist point of view, you're lost mate.

Edit: I think you need to read a bit more about the difference between prescriptivism and descriptivism and maybe read something by a linguist, or watch one of their YouTube channels. Just because you're rejecting one prescriptivist point of view, if you take up another prescriptivist point of view in counter, it's still prescriptivist. The point is, enforcing language in any direction is a pointless task, language will never do what you want it to do, all you're doing by trying, is making sure everyone is annoyed with you.

If I say Barcelona with a lisp, or without, 99.9999% of people that know what Barcelona is will understand me, you're being unnecessarily pedantic. Anyone who seeks to control language should talk to a linguist. Language isn't prescriptivist as much as non linguists like to think so. It is fluid and ever changing. People will choose how they want to speak and it will either work or it won't. If people understand what someone is saying, nothing else matters as much as many like to think.