this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
588 points (98.5% liked)

Not The Onion

12531 readers
1033 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 167 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What if you are severely immuno-compromised during a pandemic? Just die, I suppose?

[–] Stovetop 161 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Better that than to hurt the feelings of someone who cares a whole lot about people wearing masks.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 7 months ago (4 children)

From reading the article, I get the impression that this bill is mostly about them wanting to be able to arrest protesters who wear masks to hide their identity.

Which is still really shitty, to be clear.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] puppy 27 points 7 months ago (2 children)

But here I thought Republicans only cared about facts, not feelings. . .

[–] kescusay 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The Republican claim on hard-nosed, reality-based reasoning is just so astoundingly mendacious. I find myself legitimately perplexed over the whole thing.

I mean, the guys who believe the Earth is 6,000 years old, trickle-down economics work, ectopic pregnancies are a gift from God and mustn't be stopped, vaccines are poisonous, life doesn't evolve, and Donald Trump was a good president are the down-to-Earth realists? Is this performance art of some kind?

How do people like that survive to adulthood?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] foggy 90 points 7 months ago (3 children)

This would be a clear violation of ones first amendment right. Say it's your religion.

[–] themeatbridge 94 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (16 children)

The courts have already set the precedent that there are preferred religions and religions that do not enjoy the same rights because the judges don't believe in them. Our legal system is corrupt and unjust. We cannot count on the courts to protect our rights.

[–] Bahnd 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh just call the TST for this one, even the constitutional literalists cant weasel their way out of that one.

[–] themeatbridge 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They can, as they already have. There is no guarantee that their decisions will be consistent or intellectually sincere.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 3volver 67 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Banning masks is authoritarian fascist shit, especially masks that protect you from spreading contagious illnesses. Ridiculous, one year we're all told we need to wear masks to protect one another, next year we're told that it's illegal? Fuck off government, fuck off.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 7 months ago

These are the same people who argued that forcing people to wear masks is fascism.

You literally can't make this shit up.

[–] MapleEngineer 27 points 7 months ago

In one case it was experts trying to save lives. In the other it's white nationalist christofascists virtue signaling to their crushingly ignorant base.

[–] Phegan 67 points 7 months ago

America is a garbage country.

Context: I am American

[–] [email protected] 50 points 7 months ago (4 children)

There are active KKK chapters in NC. There is also a Proud Boys presence here (they're known to wear masks).

I wonder, will they be exempt from this? (I know the answer, of course. Republicans will protect their own.)

[–] [email protected] 59 points 7 months ago (4 children)

This was actually discussed. The bill makes an exception for "members of a secret society demonstrating in public" as long as they get a permit from the police first.

[–] Ultraviolet 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Of course. Good thing those that work forces and those that burn crosses are two entirely different groups and totally do not overlap.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

I was going to make a remark about how getting a permit must be really convenient, since you don't even need to leave the office.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Snapz 19 points 7 months ago

"You boys better not have no n95s under them hoods?"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] robocall 45 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

I know someone that recently got a heart transplant. They wear a mask, and take many other precautions so that their immune system doesn't reject the heart. They aren't being overly cautious - they are actually at risk. I can't imagine a government trying to arrest them for wearing a mask.

[–] Pretzilla 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

NC Republicans aren't a government

At best they are a christofascist theocracy

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ChonkyOwlbear 43 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's fine. Wearing a mask is now a political statement which is protected free speech.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Does that apply to surgeons?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 7 months ago (3 children)

My little niece just turned 19. Weeks before her birthday, she was diagnosed with cancer and is currently going through chemo.

These people can go to hell if they think they can put her even more at risk because of whatever shitty agenda they're pushing.

Party of freedom.... fuck you, fucking fascists.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago

"For health reasons" - if that's what they choose to enforce, well then... looks like every day just became Halloween.

"No officer, Im not wearing this Ronald Reagan mask for my health, I'm celebrating Halloween" "Yes, officer, in May".

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago (1 children)

my state used to be purple leaning blue...

Ahh.. good times...

they're over now

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I'm in VA. For a bit it seems like we would be a future blue state. Now we have a porn ban and Marijuana legalization, which was passed by democrats, has been effectively stalled. Possession is legal, and you can grow a small amount for personal use, but our republican governor blocked the creation of a legal market.

Republicans can get fucked. I hope that this obvious not listening to their constituents costs them in the future, but I'm really not sure. People need to vote, and not just for president.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Shelbyeileen 26 points 7 months ago

Let them try .. I'm a cancer survivor with a compromised immune system. They can fuck right off and I'll be filing an ADA complaint.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, ok, good luck enforcing that

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

They will, they will make hundreds, maybe thousands of arrests knowing full well its unconstitutional. But it'll take a year or two to work through courts at which point the courts will be completely controlled by Project 2025 magats.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cmrn 21 points 7 months ago

They really said “because we can’t get crime under control, you can’t have health measures”

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] rdrunner 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tamiya_tt02 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Does that apply to Proud Boys? Let's unmask these filthy vermin.

[–] Dasus 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

"to wear a mask for health reasons", it says.

So I guess it doesn't apply to those idiots because they don't believe in those health reasons and hide their faces because they're pussies who are afraid of being identified as the pathetic nazi fucks they are.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

good thing they forgot to ban them for security reasons...

Good thing they won't ban that.

[–] _sideffect 17 points 7 months ago

I thought that said NYC at first and was confused as it's blue, but now it makes sense

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Yes, shoot me for wearing an anti-allergy mask officer. I'm begging you.
I will live like a king siphoning off your retirement pension if you shoot me for keeping pollen out of my nose.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Oh, you sweet summer child.

Cops can murder people in cold blood, on camera, and suffer absolutely no consequences.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Good luck suing a cop. The courts have consistently ruled that they can basically do what they like and you can't sue them for shit.

https://www.ncsl.org/civil-and-criminal-justice/qualified-immunity

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ReiRose 15 points 7 months ago

I would love to get a mask made that read "I have tuberculosis".

[–] ikidd 14 points 7 months ago

I'd imagine this is more about making sure facial recognition works. Can't Big Brother if they plebs are covering their faces.

[–] KroninJ 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Hopefully this doesn't spread. My partner already has a difficult time going into public because she's highly allergic to a very common ingredient that's in practically everything.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›