this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
132 points (94.6% liked)

News

22874 readers
4212 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Red_October 80 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Once again conservative Terrorism wins.

[–] TheFeatureCreature 51 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Num10ck 3 points 4 months ago

have some pride

[–] FlyingSquid 47 points 4 months ago

I'm sure glad conservatives believe in the free market and wouldn't do things like harass people or destroy displays in Target.

[–] TheDoozer 32 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Look, this might be a controversial take, but I don't think Target ever gave a shit about Pride Month, but there were a lot of people who WERE about it so they hyped it and wanted to sell to those people.

It's like the Superbowl. Does grocery stores give a shit about the Superbowl and who is playing? No, but they'll stock up on themed shit and make displays and hype it up because it makes money to sell to the people who DO care about it.

Getting mad that Target carries Pride Month stuff is as ridiculous at getting mad that a grocery store is carrying Superbowl stuff when you don't like football. Who gives a shit? Don't buy it.

Getting mad that Target doesn't carry Pride stuff in heavily conservative areas is like getting mad at a grocery store in the UK for not having a big Superbowl display. They don't have enough people into that, so why would they promote it there?

Does Target have good (or at least not bad) policies regarding LGBTQ+ employees? Do they support LGBTQ+ groups? That's what matters.

If Pride stuff doesn't sell in hyper-conservative areas, it makes no sense to offer them there. That isn't a reflection on LGBTQ+ pride or a position taken about it.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, except that even in the swamp gay people live (or kids haven't moved away yet) and it feels nice for a change that their existence is simply appreciated instead of fought against, even if it is rainbow capitalism 101.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Yeah, but the LGBTQ people in those areas probably wouldn't buy that stuff either for fear of being outed and ostracized.

[–] CoggyMcFee 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I agree with the part about big corporations not actually caring about it, and that both the decision to stock and the decision not to stock are made cynically by a company like Target.

What I don’t agree with is that getting mad about not having Pride stuff is equivalent to getting mad about not having Super Bowl stuff. Football fans are not an oppressed segment of society that has feared harassment and violence. There is not a constant threat of legislation aimed at harming their community. It’s also not important that football fandom is normalized by society at large.

So even if we were talking about the Super Bowl, if 5-10% of people in the UK actually were American football fans, and were under constant threat by UK society, then it would be completely understandable to get mad at Target for being cynical about even that! Indeed, I guarantee in those places where Target isn’t carrying pride stuff, there are LGBTQ+ people living there.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We support LGBTQ+ rights*

*ᵒⁿˡʸ ʷʰᵉʳᵉ ʷᵉ ᶜᵃⁿ ᵖʳᵒᶠᶦᵗ ᶠʳᵒᵐ ᶦᵗ ᵃⁿᵈ ʷᵒⁿ'ᵗ ᶠᵃᶜᵉ ᵇᵃᶜᵏˢˡᵃˢʰ

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

ʷᵒⁿ'ᵗ ᶠᵃᶜᵉ ᵇᵃᶜᵏˢˡᵃˢʰ

Can I offer you a forward slash in these trying times?

[–] robocall 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is some Bud light backtracking energy here

[–] gAlienLifeform 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If Books Could Kill did a fantastic podcast episode a while back that dove into how completely fucking stupid the 2023 backlash to Target and Bud Light both were and how mainstream media really helped them along by refusing to report it with any depth or detail

You should be able to find it here next to the title "BONUS: Conservatives vs. Pride Month" - https://feeds.buzzsprout.com/2040953.rss

[–] Omegamanthethird 3 points 4 months ago

"mainstream media really helped them along by refusing to report it with any depth or detail"

That's mainstream media in a nutshell. They don't want to dig into the "why" so they can appear unbiased. And it always helps Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago

Quiet Pride isn't Pride - Pride is loud.

[–] Phegan 15 points 4 months ago

Seems like target is caving to terrorists.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Me to Target: Ah, so you're a bitch

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

considers

Were they going to stock it in all stores to begin with?

Like, I assume that they don't just use a fixed strategy to stock stores across the country. Even aside from regional fashion preferences, you've got varying climate as an input. Part of what they do as a retailer is gonna be recording what people buy and making optimal use of advertising and stocking space to sell to people, and in a computer era, I'd think that they'd be doing that at a more-fine-grained level than nationwide.

googles

It looks like Target pulled Confederate flag gear from their stores in the past too. I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that they probably weren't selling them in, say, their San Francisco locations, even prior to that. Similarly, I'm also guessing that they probably aren't selling "pridewear" in rural Mississippi or whatnot. That isn't even to deal with people getting grouchy about it being there...just that those items aren't gonna sell well.

[–] Phegan 11 points 4 months ago

The fact that target sells Confederate gear at all is problematic.

[–] drunkpostdisaster 8 points 4 months ago

The confederate flag is just as bad as a swastika. It should not be tolerated at all no matter what backward hick shit hole the store happens to be in.

[–] venusaur 4 points 4 months ago

Probably more an issue of sales revenue vs politics. Target doesn’t really care.