this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
1009 points (98.8% liked)

Star Wars Memes

11692 readers
513 users here now

Hello there. Somehow, Star Wars memes have returned. It's not a trap, this is where the fun begins.

==========

Other universes to visit:

[email protected]

[email protected]

Separatist systems:

[email protected]

Oh hey some real SW content for a change (perhaps):

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

==========

IMPORTANT

Please do not post the "good friend" or similar copypasta

==========

Our galactic citizens have requested more specific rules, so here are a few.

The general idea is, if you're looking here for rules, you're probably someone who doesn't need to have them spelled out. You're fine. But anyway:

  1. This is a community for Star Wars memes. This means typically screenshots of Star Wars media with some text or context that's meant to be funny and/or thoughtful. All SW media is welcome: movies, games, comic books, fanart... Other kinds of content, like video links or meta memes (about this community, or Lemmy), are fine as well, just keep it on topic.

  2. We are all friends here, and love (sometimes love to hate) Star Wars. Be nice to each other.

  3. As fans of fictional media, we can be passionate. If you very strongly disagree with something or someone, take a deep breath before reacting. Anger leads to the dark side!

  4. Everything in Star Wars has happened a long time ago, in a galaxy far away, and it's a rich universe of millions of words and millions of years of history. So current Earthly matters really shouldn't concern us here. In other words, leave politics, philosophies and convictions behind the door. This applies even if it's about something related to Star Wars.

  5. Original content is preferred. Reposts are fine, just please limit to a maximum of 3 per day, per citizen. It is recommended, but not required, to mark original memes as (OC) and reposts as (repost).

  6. Local mods are the Jedi council. They may take actions that are necessary to maintain peace and stability of the Republic, even beyond the rules outlined here. Follow their guidance.

  7. Regular rules of the Lemmy.world instance apply.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Diplomjodler3 143 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] danc4498 12 points 7 months ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If it weren’t for those pesky content breaks every now and then, they could serve even more ads. Won’t somebody think of the shareholders?

[–] Diplomjodler3 11 points 7 months ago

Those damn consumers are so entitled! Why can't we just serve ads continually instead of having to produce expensive content?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 108 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I'm old enough to remember the promise that cable TV was paid so you wouldn't have commercials...it lasted what, 6 months? The channels without commercials cost extra...le sigh

[–] Couldbealeotard 34 points 7 months ago

Yep. It was pretty clear streaming services were always going to end up the same way from the start. Even YouTube has, although that was harder to predict when it was mostly 30s cat videos.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 7 months ago (10 children)

Pretty wild to want to add channel when:

  • their interface is garbage
  • their content is pretty lacking

If they play any "pay for that channel", it's insta unsub

[–] TK420 14 points 7 months ago

I’m already thinking about it. I can’t watch new content outside the service, so if I’m torrenting for long term storage regardless, why am I paying in the first place?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] affiliate 57 points 7 months ago (1 children)

its so tiresome to have all these services constantly made worse. these days it feels whenever a new thing comes out, it has about two or three years before it's run into the ground in pursuit of the almighty dollar.

and this kind of thing is also happening to movies/tv shows/video game franchises. it feels like no matter how good it starts, you only get (at most) 2 or 3 sequels before the executives get their hands on it and run it into the ground. sure there are exceptions to this, but they are few and far between. and its becoming even more common for shows/video games to simply disappear if the parent company decides to remove them from online stores/streaming platforms.

all around, it just feels like things are becoming less and less permanent

[–] themeatbridge 32 points 7 months ago

You're describing capitalism. That's literally what happens to everything when capitalism is unchecked.

"Hey, we're getting pretty good at producing food. Let's put corn syrup in everything and make cheap food addictive."

"Hey, we just noticed that frightened people buy more guns. Let's make sure criminals can always buy guns so that we are arming everyone!"

"Land is the one thing they aren't making more of. Let's drive prices up while interest rates are low so that people have to spend all of their income on rent or die in the streets!"

When profits are the only motivation, then products and services will only get so good before the investor class starts looking for ways to take advantage of leverage instead of innovation. Unregulated markets create opportunities for unbalanced relationships between producers and consumers, and it is always built on the lie that you can influence the markets by "voting with your dollars," as though enshittification is what we want, what we deserve.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 7 months ago (5 children)

man, piracy, i mean owning physical media, seems like a better and better method of enjoying media.

It's a good thing every show ever has been released on physical media. Right? Right?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If pirating it and saving to a thumb drive counts as physical media, then yeah, I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dellish 34 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Let me guess: which channels you have access to depend on your subscription level? Fuck these jerks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WarlordSdocy 33 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Honestly this is a nice feature for some kinds of shows. Sometimes I don't want to watch a show from the beginning in order for certain kinds of shows. The only problem is this feature is coming as streaming services are fracturing and becoming less and less usable.

[–] Dozzi92 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Right, give me Seinfeld shows on random. TNG. Fucking early seasons of Family Guy. Community to an extent. So many sitcoms that you can really watch a random episode and be good to go. Sometimes it's midnight and you're too drunk to go to bed and don't want to think about what you're going to watch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] abbotsbury 13 points 7 months ago

Yeah one thing streaming has never been able to replicate is a shuffle mode. Pirating, I can just load everything into a VLC playlist and mix it

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

yeah a ten minute script for your local media playershould be able to manage this.

edit: or 'shuffle' I'm a fucking idiot. I'm literally using that for music right now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If they do it like Paramount I'm all for it. I like just throwing on the Star Trek channel rather than deciding what episode of which series I want to watch. That's part of why I get so much use out of Plex's Live TV channels. Only difference is paramount doesn't have ads on their channels

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Live TV is handy for sports, but sort of out of date for the modern habit of binge streaming a series.

I don't really want to watch TV starting from the middle of an episode in the middle of a series. I'd much rather just jump to where I was in my Dropout queue and start watching whatever show is next in the list.

[–] Sludgeyy 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Not everyone wants to binge a show from start to finish

For example, I really enjoyed the episodes of the office that I have watched. It was many years ago and it was only random episodes I caught while airing on TV.

Went to Netflix to watch at started on episode 1. From what I hear season 1 isn't the greatest. I got through a couple episodes and then thought to myself, this is going to take so many nights of watching to watch them all in order. Never watched another again.

Now if I could turn on the television and say S6EP7 was playing I'd probably enjoy watching it. Might even watch the next episode too.

With classic TV you also get the feeling that you're watching the show with others.

Channel 1 is having a Harry Potter bingeathon. I catch it on episode 3 and continue to watch it. I've seen them all multiple times so I don't really care where I start. But it's nice knowing others are having a HP bingeathon with me on a Saturday afternoon. If I was sitting there with my plex server, I could play any HP. But I'm never going to put it on and if I did it would just be me watching the show.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I have playlists set up in Plex that I use like a TV channel. One's all [adult swim] cartoons, another is old sci fi, another is just documentaries. Best part is no commercials.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] troglodytis 30 points 7 months ago

🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️ argh, matey

[–] 9point6 24 points 7 months ago (9 children)

I've kinda wished services would do something a bit like this for a while:

One channel for new stuff, based on your recommendations—just gives you a load of random tastes of shows without you actively picking through things

One for stuff you rewatch. For example, if you've watched always sunny or peep show through a couple of times, put random episodes on this channel for when you just want something in the background

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

YES! FINALLY! I FUCKING LOVE LINEAR TV PROGRAMMING!

[–] bitwaba 9 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Not being funny, I actually do love linear programming. I miss the days when I'd just turn on the TV and there's be a random episode of the Simpsons or King of the Hill, or something with stupidly many episode like one of the thousand Law & Orders.

Picking something to watch from the beginning is a chore, and now I feel invested if I don't end up being in the mood. Stuff that's just "already playing" is something I dreamed of recreating when I started (not)pirating everything. "It started 5 minute ago but this is a good episode " was how I grew up watching TV (and even movies).

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mlg 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They're really gonna make people start pirating out of spite lol

[–] krush_groove 20 points 7 months ago

Started a while ago, matey.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Minus ad breaks, I missed this aspect of content consumption. Choosing to watch a random episode of a random show just doesn’t happen and I missed being able to just “see what’s on”. I spent a fair amount of time setting up random “channels” I can tune into that play random episodes from tv shows on my media server and it’s great.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (2 children)

A lot of newer shows cannot be watched randomly though because the episodes actually build upon each other.

If you take older shows like TNG or X files: you could easily jump back in after missing half a season. The episodes were written to be mostly self-contained, because missing an episode or two because of life was very very common. Season finales were often a major exception, and were therefore also majority advertised so people knew to plan around them.

If you write a show for streaming, however, there is no concept of "missing an episode". So the writers are freed from that constraint, and subsequently write shows that are only meant to be watched in their entirety, in order.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Iron_Lynx 19 points 7 months ago

And companies wonder why film piracy is on the rise... 🤔

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Lol all this time these media companies have had to change their models to align with market forces, we've watched them hem and haw, drag their feet, etc. this step shows they never wanted things to change at all, and they have the power and the money to keep change from happening. finally we see them at their end game, harnessing the Internets power for something so tiny. To them, the only benefit to this technology is cutting out the middleman and b bringing able packages to you without negotiations with a cable service.

Their minds are so small, but this and worse is their greatest dream. It's a terrible, venal world that small minds lead us to isn't it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The only good thing about streaming services is theoretically they aren't region tied.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They usually are though. Most content (excluding their own) is not available in all regions due to licensing issues.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The only thing I really miss about cable over a media server on shuffle is the ability to know what is going to come up next in the shuffle.

And if they could add bumpers like on adult swim that would be awesome, too.

[–] Buddahriffic 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't sound like too difficult of a feature to add to a media server. Just generate a playlist instead of picking the next thing on demand. Could add constraints like "choose show at random but select next sequential episode of that show from the previous one shown" or "fully random but do not repeat anything for x time/things".

Makes me wish I had that stuff set up to experiment with.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EvilEyedPanda 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The more things change....

[–] TheRealKuni 8 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] daltotron 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Can we get rid of IP laws pretty please

[–] pyre 26 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

we need to change them, not get rid of them. i think completely getting rid of IP laws would benefit big corpos like Disney. they would do to any small creator what Amazon does to small shops. they already try to do it as much as possible, but they'd be much more free to crush everyone else smaller than them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This has been the plan for decades.

Telecom companies existed before the internet and have made every effort their television fiefdoms would have the right to own it as well.

Then again the only bastion of defense against this has been a parade of old ass people who don't own computers and were handed a smartphone 15 years ago but only want campaign donations in exchange for not understanding the problem.

So it really wasn't much effort at all to turn the internet into TV 2.0.

[–] inclementimmigrant 10 points 7 months ago

VPN, random port, docker, and jellyfin.

The golden age of streaming has passed.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Only for $300/month, with a 2 year contract

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stoly 9 points 7 months ago

I can't see this sticking. The only people I know who have cable are my Boomer parents. The model is dead.

[–] EfreetSK 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Have they already added commercial breaks?

[–] Vorticity 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Amazon did. They kept the price the same, added commercials, then offered to remove the commercials for an additional $4/month.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›