this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
432 points (98.0% liked)

politics

18059 readers
2678 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

People can’t stop cracking up over the former president’s bizarre, bumbling speech.

Speaking outside Allentown, Pennsylvania, on Sunday, Donald Trump left everyone confused when he attempted to explain the Battle of Gettysburg, praised (and invented a quote from) Confederate General Robert E. Lee, and generally had no idea what he was talking about. 

When his off-the-cuff remarks hit late-night television on Monday, the hosts couldn’t hide their laughter. 

“You have to hand it to this guy: On the weekend before his unprecedented criminal trial begins, he somehow manages to overshadow it with this broken-brained interpretation of what happened at Gettysburg during the Civil War,” Jimmy Kimmel quipped.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 141 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Being an actual moron isn't a "gaffe" lol.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Yea, the guy is ignorant and is used to BSing his way through it. His wealth has long sheltered him from being called out on it.

"look having nuclear...." Moron

[–] rayyy 30 points 2 months ago

is used to BSing his way through it

When you are famous they let you do it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart — you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the smartest people anywhere in the world — it’s true! — but when you're a conservative Republican they try — oh, do they do a number — that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune — you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged — but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me — it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are — nuclear is so powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he was right, who would have thought? — but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners — now it used to be three, now it’s four — but when it was three and even now, I would have said it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don't, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years — but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us, this is horrible."

Donald "Tiny hands" Trump

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Being a moron is not enough. You also have to suffer from rapidly advancing dementia to be regarded as the literal second coming of Christ by "conservatives".

[–] Passerby6497 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, that makes perfect sense. Their other darling president was a talentless hack, brainless politician with dementia, so it 100% tracks that they can't get on their knees fast enough.

[–] billiam0202 18 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Their other darling president was a talentless hack, brainless ~~politician~~ entertainer with dementia

Yeah, I'm not sure the right elected St. Ronnie or Trump because of their political acumen.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 13 points 2 months ago

To be fair, and I say this as no fan of Ronnie Raygun, he seemed relatively normal until the later years. A jerkass right-wing nut in practice, who screwed up a LOT of things and set the stage for later disasters, but otherwise human. Possibly even personally likable. I didn’t cheer when he got shot, like.

Trump is seven layers of freak criminal mental disease. If Jodie Foster’s Army was active and working today, I’d be dancing on the rooftops.

[–] Passerby6497 10 points 2 months ago

I'm ~~not~~ sure the right elected St. Ronnie or Trump because of their lack of political acumen.

Actually, I'm pretty sure that's exactly why they elected both. Idiots are notoriously easy to manipulate and control.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 2 months ago (48 children)

What exactly do people see in Trump? He's got no idea what happened at Gettysburg, why even bring it up?

[–] [email protected] 82 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

He lets people who "believe in him" let go of all guilt, shame, and self-doubt. It doesn't matter if you're racist, sexist, or homophobic, it doesn't matter if you commit crimes, perpetrate injustice, blaspheme, or maliciously harm others, as long as you believe in Trump, he forgives you. It's intoxicating to some people. He's like the opposite of Jesus. Some kind of "anti-Jesus."

As far as why Trump even brought it up, he's a narcissist who has never had boundaries or been held accountable for anything. He just says and does whatever he wants in the moment.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago

He’s like the opposite of Jesus. Some kind of “anti-Jesus.”

I wonder if the bible has anything to say about that...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

What di they see in him? He is a schoolyard bully with opposition defiant disorder, a fraud, a racist, and a rapist. They are looking in a mirror and they approve.

load more comments (46 replies)
[–] ickplant 49 points 2 months ago (5 children)

These are his actual words... or word salad:

Union was saved by the immortal heroes at Gettysburg. Gettysburg. What an unbelievable battle that was, the battle of Gettysburg. What an unbelievable… I mean, it was so much and so interesting and so vicious and horrible and so beautiful in so many different ways. It represented such a big portion of the success of this country. Gettysburg, wow. I go to Gettysburg, PA to look and to watch. And the statement of Robert E Lee, who’s no longer in favor. Did you ever notice that? No longer in favor. “Never fight uphill, me boys, never fight uphill.” They were fighting uphill, he said. Wow, that was a big mistake. He lost his great general, and they were fighting. “Never fight uphill, me boys,” but it was too late.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Everything he says sounds like it’s being said by someone taking an oral test on a topic they know nothing about and have never studied but their gigantic and undeserved ego won’t allow them to admit their total and complete ignorance on the subject at hand.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He's like the presidential version of the Nigerian prince scam email. That email contains a bunch of intentional misspellings and grammatical errors because the phishers want to weed out people who can think and reason correctly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

That's it? This is more coherent than usual. We aren't discussing the Air Force bases during the American Revolution so it was one of the better days for demented Donald.

[–] TwoBeeSan 10 points 2 months ago

The fact an audience will sit there enraptured is the scariest part.

What a dunderhead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That wasn't a gaffe. It's his normal way of not knowing a damned thing about any subject and just spewing random adjectives.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL 40 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ok but seriously, he’s demented. Not kidding. His brain is ill.

[–] Burn_The_Right 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And a majority of conservatives still agree that he is the most accurate representative of their thoughts.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] anon6789 38 points 2 months ago

I thought I was going crazy thinking he must have held a second rally, because Gettysburg isn't anywhere near where he was speaking. The place he was at is as close to NYC or almost any part of the Jersey Shore as it was to Gettysburg.

To just randomly go into a speech about how General Lee isn't as beloved as he used to be is really out of nowhere and how it could be directed to anyone other than some racist types is beyond me.

I really hope my state can start to heal itself if we can whomp the Rs again this election. There's still a rabid base of these supporters though, but they've been laying a bit low. I've been seeing signs up all over for Mark Houck instead of Trump, so I looked up who this guy was and he twice assaulted a 72-year-old abortion clinic escort.

Houck was accused of physically assaulting Bruce Love, a 72-year-old clinic escort, in October 2021. Love was attempting to escort two patients exiting the Philadelphia clinic when Houck “forcefully shoved” him to the ground, according to the Justice Department. On a separate occasion, Houck allegedly verbally confronted the escort and shoved him to the ground outside the clinic. Love sustained injuries that required medical attention.

However, Houck said he spoke outside of abortion clinics each week and sometimes brought his 12-year-old son along. He said he shoved Love after the clinic escort invaded his son’s personal space and yelled at him.

This is who the Rs are trying to get to push out their long term somewhat moderate current Republican rep.

Vote 'em out, me boys!

[–] homesweethomeMrL 38 points 2 months ago (12 children)

DON'T FIGHT UPHILL ME BOYS!

such a famous quote, delivered with all the gravitas that it warrants

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] BrokenGlepnir 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The quote he made up reeks of lost cause mentality. The idea that Lee lost because his generals didn't follow his grand wisdom has been around since right after the war. There was a southern journalist who lost a defamation case to a general he claimed didn't adhere to orders. I think some lost cause circles still bring it up. Despite winning the case the guy was military not pr, and didn't know how to use the money to repair his reputation from a guy who professionally spreads information (disinformation in this case).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Addv4 34 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not joking, I saw a couple of excerpts from the speech shortly on here, and thought it was just a meme. Didn't even realize it was real until the next day when I saw the clip of him saying it. Just originally thought it was just too dumb to say, even for Trump.

[–] formergijoe 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"[Robert E. Lee] said, 'Never fight uphill, me boys! Never fight uphill!' They were fighting uphill. He said, 'Wow...'"

[–] aDuckk 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They were fighting uphill. He said, "Wow.."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] n0m4n 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Compare "potatoe" to Trump's speech. This speech needs to be played again and again as a campaign ad gift from Trump.

[–] nickiwest 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I am old enough to remember that. My, how times have changed.

Also, remember the time that Howard Dean tried to stir up some excitement among his campaign supporters and was knocked as "not being presidential"?

This is truly the Darkest Timeline™.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cosmicrookie 18 points 2 months ago (23 children)

Its already a meme. Interestingly its not the first time he got this quote wrong!

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/never-fight-uphill-me-boys

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›