this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
392 points (85.6% liked)

Confidently Incorrect

4044 readers
2 users here now

When people are way too smug about their wrong answer.

Posting guidelines.

All posts in this community have come from elsewhere, it is not original content, the poster in this community is not OP. The person who posts in this community isn’t necessarily endorsing whatever the post is talking about and they are not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

There is currently no rule about how recent a post needs to be because the community is about the comeback part, not the topic.

Rules:

• Be civil and remember the human.

• No trolling, insults or name calling. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone.

• No bigotry of any kind, including homophobia, transphobia, sexism and racism.

• You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

• Try not to get too political. A lot of these posts will involve politics, but this isn’t the place for political arguments.

• Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguements sake.

• Mark NSFW posts if they contain nudity.

• Satire is allowed but please start the post title with [satire] so other users can filter it out if they’d like.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  4. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum.
  5. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  6. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  7. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  8. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 97 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah for real, there's been another very old tweet that this seems to be based on. Might be real but reads very copied from the previous one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

Tell me you don’t talk to female academics, lol.

[–] UESPA_Sputnik 54 points 9 months ago (1 children)

NASA Earth meeting

Are there also meetings on other planets?

[–] robotica 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Duh, it's NASA, they can fly to the Moon or Mars

[–] UESPA_Sputnik 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They should do a video call instead of flying there for meetings all the time. Much more efficient and cheaper.

[–] robotica 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Imagine the latency to Mars though

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Just use a cable

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gmtom 37 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'd be willing to bet this isn't real.

I've been to lots of scientific talks and the idea of someone trying to call put the person talking is kind of ridulous and never happens. You would have to an asshole of the highest calibre to do that. And the fact he mentions a specific paper/person and that just happened to be tbe person speaking and the idea that the speakers name wasn't listed is just so incredibly unlikely I can't ever imagine that happening.

This just seems like the kind of thing people fantasing happening, so they can smugly correct them.

[–] jj4211 14 points 9 months ago

To be fair, she didn't say she was giving a talk, guess it could have been a side conversation. It would seem more likely in a little side conversation.

However, at least when it happened to me, the other person remembered the paper but not the author, so it seems weird to refer to the paper by author. Also it feels weird even if he did remember to throw in the "et al". It's extra weird for her to declare that she is "McCarty et al", since she is saying she is "and others". It feels like a detail thrown in to make the exchange sound more "sciencey", when it doesn't make sense.

Since I had it happen to me, I'm sure it's happened to other paper writers, but this exchange doesn't sound like a realistic way for it to go down. So it's at least massaged for dramatic effect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Why did she have to specify the "white male" part?

[–] [email protected] 102 points 9 months ago (3 children)

to trigger insecure white males

[–] njm1314 62 points 9 months ago

Judging from this thread, mission accomplished.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I find it unnecessary. Race/gender/skin color or whatever shouldn't matter.

[–] dustyData 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You know how it goes, not all white males… but almost always it is a white male.

This guy probably wouldn't have even considered insulting a speaker that way if she wasn't a woman. In a scientific setting it's one thing disagreeing with an argument, and attacking the person proposing the argument.

[–] Crashumbc 8 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Not true, African American males are just as sexist as white American males.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Yet somehow it is true that the vast majority of smug people who are confidently wrong are white males. Maybe someday we can have equality in the ratio of being smug while confidently wrong.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago

The irony of this comment

[–] [email protected] 44 points 9 months ago (8 children)

Because that's the group most likely to commit misogyny in the workplace? Especially in male dominated fields.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

When someone commits a robbery and they happen to be the race that commits robberies the most often, do you feel the need to point that out?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yes and I don't think you pointing out the truth of this stereotype is unwarranted here. But her pointing it out in the first place was. Replace this with another accurate stereotype about another race. Let's say there's a city in which a certain race, per capita, commits crimes more than another. Does that warrant someone saying, "So I got mugged, and of course it was a black guy!"

This type of stereotyping is clearly spiteful, ignores greater understanding about the social situation, and perpetuates the untrue idea most people conflate with these stereotypes: Every member of the race is like this. This is even internalized by members of the race in question, perpetuating the greater social issue itself.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] givesomefucks 27 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I mean, she's McCarty...

But I feel like this reploat has been around for a decade by now, and it's always bothered me.

Just sounds like a George Costanaza thing where she thought of this comeback but never in the moment

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago (4 children)

the hair thing could be drama for the tweet but everything else is not the first time nor the last time that happened, there are others stories like that

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tikiporch 5 points 9 months ago

Don't you understand? It's not about him. To have a line as perfect as 'jerk store' and to never use it. I, I couldn't live with myself.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago

Human drivers of fire??

[–] slipperydippery 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's not how "et al" works

[–] WaxedWookie 10 points 9 months ago

Someone call the police!

I am the police.

Colloquially, it is.

[–] Mango 12 points 9 months ago

White guys in this thread: Hey now, this racism business is a two way street.

Everyone else: Your race is bad so we can be racist!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

Ooofff

Big L right there

This once again shows how important it is to acknowledge ones own biases and to account for them.

[–] feedum_sneedson 5 points 9 months ago

holy shit just like digimon

[–] Thcdenton 4 points 9 months ago

But Doctor, I Am Pagliacci

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Wow. If true, sick slam.

load more comments
view more: next ›