sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] WaxedWookie 17 points 1 month ago

Who'd have thought Business Insider would be running interference for the neoliberal slide into end-stage capitalism, by blaming those worst affected by the collapse for the symptoms that are fucking them over?

[-] WaxedWookie 6 points 1 month ago

Ah - You must be referring to the ones that funded and backed Hamas's rise to power over the secular moderates with predictable results...

Israel.

[-] WaxedWookie 18 points 1 month ago
[-] WaxedWookie 7 points 1 month ago

He denied threatening the driver with arrest, but kept threatening him with obstruction, which is a secondary charge unless I'm mistaken.

[-] WaxedWookie 7 points 1 month ago

So what if now hear me out we do none of that, and do number go up instead - you know - for the shareholders?

[-] WaxedWookie 1 points 1 month ago

That's bound to work out great with their history of crashing...

[-] WaxedWookie 4 points 1 month ago

Who will pay their ~~bribes to secure a healthy pipeline of human suffering because that's good for their investors~~ donations to encourage more great policies and responsible governance.

[-] WaxedWookie 8 points 1 month ago

But prison is so much more expensive... Looks at political donations from prison companies Ah - that'll do it.

Why bother with representation and good policy when you can have corruption, graft, and all the wonders of late stage capitalism.

[-] WaxedWookie 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes - being flattered and disinterested in someone that just keeps coming back for more embarrassment is the creepy bit. It's long past time you fucked off - this block is for your own good.

Try to work on your credulity - assuming civilians (and UN aid workers yesterday) being executed in drone strikes by a genocidal regime is all above board is evidence of a severe cognitive deficiency.

Edit: I guess we can throw the Iranian consulate on to the pile too.

[-] WaxedWookie -1 points 1 month ago

What's hard to understand is why you skipped the question I asked, and answered a different one instead.

The creation of the CSAM is unquestionably far more harmful, but I wasn't talking about the *creation *- I was talking about the possession. The harm of the creation is already done, and whether or not the material exists after that does nothing to undo that harm.

Again, is your prescription the same as it relates to the possession, not generation of CSAM?

[-] WaxedWookie 0 points 1 month ago

Yet you keep coming back for more...

Is this some kind of humiliation fetish deal? I'm flattered but not interested - if nothing else, given the dumb, inconsistent nonsense you're spouting, I've got concerns about your capacity for consent.

What did I say about trotting on, again? Get to it.

[-] WaxedWookie 2 points 1 month ago

There we have it folks.

You couldn't help putting a nice little bow on my point, could you?

view more: next ›

WaxedWookie

joined 10 months ago