this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
612 points (96.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36156 readers
882 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 170 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

for many years now – stopped using them back when they started to ignore +include, -exclude, and "phrases"

[–] [email protected] 57 points 10 months ago

It was a necessary move to incorporate support for Google+ profiles. /s

[–] gibmiser 30 points 10 months ago (3 children)

So wait, the search operators don't work anymore? It seemed like it but is that confirmed?

[–] Carnelian 64 points 10 months ago (4 children)

They still work as intended actually, but most pages are so inundated with SEO garble that they’re effectively useless

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

And if it limits the results too much they just ignore them to cram more ads in.

Can’t have the bottom of the page spelling gogle.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

They still work but they search the entire page, not just what's visible in your browser. A search for "term" does not implicate you being able to find term on the results' rendered pages.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So pages are just including every relevant term hidden somewhere like they making resumes in the early aughts with 4pt white text with bullshit at the bottom?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

A popular SEO trick around 15 years ago was to put a bunch of search terms in a heading tag near the top of your page markup and just style it to minimize its appearance, because if you completely hid it google would penalize your pagerank score. They test for visibility but it's difficult to do so in a foolproof and futureproof way so there's likely a similar technique still seeing some limited use today.

It's far less effective or straightforward than the modern prevailing SEO strategy; which is using generative AI that have been trained on all the top-ranked pages to produce exactly what google likes and ranks highly. Which has a knock-on effect of causing all these AIs to start eating themselves by training on pages produced by AI, like a kind of human-centipede ouroboros.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fujiwood 97 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Google is no longer a search engine.

It's a storefront.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gedaliyah 77 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

Yes. If you do a search on this site for posts about google, you'll find multiple threads about this. Basically it seems that google is losing the arms race against SEO, and new LLM bots are mostly responsible.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Basically it seems that google is losing the arms race against SEO[...]

What does this mean in particular?

[–] [email protected] 50 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Companies are better at getting their shitty product/spammy pages to the top of search results than Google is able to find high quality pages to show you.

Google has to create algorithms to judge pages based on their content and get good results , companies only have to fine tune their pages to match the algorithm.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago

People with mediocre content using SEO to get themselves higher in the search results than sites with actual information on them. That way when searching for something you need to dig through the shit to get to the nugget of actual useful info.

Search engines tried to rank pages based on how big the chance is the info the user is looking for is actually on that page. SEO makes it so that pages with a lower chance of containing the right info, are ranked before pages with a higher chance. This leads those pages to get more hits and thus marketing thinks it's done their job. But in reality it just pisses off users, blaming the dumb sites that do this and more often the search engine. Search engines are trying to fight this, but SEO is big business, so they are losing the battle.

Now these days there are more issues, like search engines not having access to a lot of info in so called walled gardens. So more good info gets created in places where it can't easily be found. Also search engines have become more and more advertisement machines instead of search engines and with this shift in priorities, the user experience deteriorates.

But yeah SEO sucks and has always sucked.

[–] gibmiser 15 points 10 months ago

Search Engine Optimization. Not providing the best search result, but tricking the search engine into thinking you have the best result.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Krudler 74 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I live in central Canada.

I am reading the comments, and I am noticing that other people's experiences are very different than mine.

For me, Google Search has reached the point where it will not even give me results for my search terms. I say this without an iota of hyperbole.

It's so coincidental that this conversation comes up, but I actually sat there yesterday agog, looking at my desktop Firefox browser window... Scrolling through the entire search results page and realizing that not a single thing was even close to what I searched

It is noteworthy because I have been observing a steady decline, but it was the very first time I could make use of literally nothing that they gave back. In an unsettling way, the gravity of it hit me emotionally right there.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Retro_unlimited 64 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Google search was so legendary when it came out, it was able to find me perfect results when I would even type in almost gibberish, it somehow predicted what I actually meant. Over time the results were worse and worse, then nothing but products would show in the results a few years ago. Buy this, buy what,etc. no more research, just trash products in the search results. Google greed killed itself.

[–] nomous 24 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The Search Engine became a small part of Googles operations, and then Google became a small part of Alphabets operations.

Turns out advertising is where the money is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ars had an article about it: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/01/google-search-is-losing-the-fight-with-seo-spam-study-says/

It's not just you—Google Search is getting worse. A new study from Leipzig University, Bauhaus-University Weimar, and the Center for Scalable Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence looked at Google search quality for a year and found the company is losing the war against SEO (Search Engine Optimization) spam.

They're also not particularly motivated to try harder. They don't have a lot of competition, and they make a lot of money this way. And their leadership are idiots.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, the first measurements are rolling in and not looking great: https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/17/google_search_results_spam/

Basically, imagine someone built a machine that made it trivial to generate an infinite number of realistic-looking articles (=LLMs). And there's a monetary incentive to do so (=ad money).
So, I have to imagine, all search engines are absolutely being blasted with spam content, and they have to filter out realistic-looking articles to make their search results worthwhile at all, but as a result, some real search results will also get filtered out or ranked badly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 10 months ago

The entire internet has drastically declined for me.

[–] EnderMB 44 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

I don't say this to be dismissive, but Google's search results have been getting worse for the better part of a decade now, and they're still far above anyone else. While I do think that engines like Bing are closer to Google's quality than most give them credit for, Google is still the only game in town. There are other search engines that people use, but they are niches in niches, and are probably used for belief reasons over an improvement in quality.

Frankly, I think that for the first time in history, the search market is open for competition. There is an argument to be made whether Google either doesn't care about their search quality, or that it's simply a hard problem to solve for anyone. If the former is true, then a competitor could make a very real case for overthrowing Google, given the right backing and hype behind them.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

The rate at which the results got worse has a notable pattern in line with their drive for ad revenue. Most of the results are garbage because they are driven by money rather than user choice and popularity. The more money you pour into tuning SEO and Google Ads the higher you rank. To hell with relevance or what users actually want.

I ran a web community for writers from 1997 onward, and threw in the towel this year. The site had a core following but we relied on a steady trickle of new users from organic search and word of mouth to stay afloat. And little by little no matter how much time I put into SEO and the site we continued to slide due to a combination of seo rank and google just removing pages without explanation or reason. After spending the last 5 years rebuilding the site for SEO and mobile optimization, I watched google index 99% of the sitemap, our rank come back up slightly, new users starting to come in... And then it just... Stopped. I went to check the indexing, and google had silently moved all the indexed pages back to "crawled but not indexed" for no bloody reason. Zero errors, codes or messages.

I threw in the towel. The site was costing me nearly $500usd a month to operate and I could not throw a dime at ads. I had tried getting ad revenue on the site a few years back even though I did not want ads on the site and it looked promising... I got 90% of the way to covering monthly costs, but before the first cheque was cut google banned me from that service with no explanation. I followed every rule, discouraged regular members from clicking ads unless they really wanted to see the thing the ad was showing. Still got banned. And google just doesn't even care to explain themselves.

I closed the site in January because I realized the internet I fell in love with, the one I created that community for... Its dead. Killed by capitalism.

Might be for the best. I can throw my coding time at open-source projects now. Just need to find one that entices me.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 10 months ago (2 children)

In general yes. I'm not going to pull exact numbers up but I think it started declining around 2018.

I've heard it said they switched to whatever was most profitable rather than what was actually useful or relevant. I still find good results when looking up niche tech issues, but if it's more mainstream I get really weird results, so that might indeed be what's happening.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 10 months ago

Looking up niche stuff gets harder and harder it seems. It always seems to "translate" my very specific request into a very general search and giving me useless results. It highlights search terms in the results, which aren't even in my original search query. Google just thinks it knows better and it never ever does.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Not just Google. Duck duck go was good for awhile but now also getting worse. Assume this is Ai and other tools screwing with how their web crawlers collect data. Expect it to get worse before it gets better.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nikls94 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Also, google images sucks now. Try googling for anything specific, like "sand in pc" or "red carb on plate" - all AI generated

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Yes. I'm using the same search methods I've always used that used to get me relevant results, and I get a bunch of fucking sponsored links instead. I've noticed lately that if the result of a search is a YouTube video and I click on it, it doesn't go to YouTube but opens up as a search result and plays me ads somehow bypassing my adblocker that works just fine in actual YouTube. More than once after the ad was done, the video refused to load, which was utterly infuriating.

Google assistant on my phone has also become garbage. They changed the functionality of the few key things I liked to use, and now it's totally useless to me. Google is swirling down the shitter faster than yesterdays tacos. Honestly, if it wasn't for email, photos, and using an Android phone, I'd probably be done with them entirely.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (12 children)

Use Ublock Origin to block all ads. Takes 20 seconds to install, and works on all browsers

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ozoned 24 points 10 months ago (7 children)

I stopped using it years ago because they were going downhill and still collecting your private information. I run my own SearXNG now. It proxies from multiple sources, no ads, no tracking. I really enjoy SearXNG as it's mine.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Don’t miss this article (Lemmy discussion) from an air purifier review site for an in-depth look at how trusted publishers have been downsizing, then outsourcing generation of affiliate listicles. Drowns out sites who actually buy & test products.

alt-text: Google results for “best air purifiers "dotdash meredith"” showing People, Better Homes & Gardens, and a dozen other brands showing up, all reusing the same low-quality content

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago

Yea, turns out that without competition companies are lazy as fuck.

[–] Cairden 21 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Yes it has. And it's talked about all over Lemmy. Is there a circle jerk community on Lemmy?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Lanila 20 points 10 months ago
[–] TommySoda 20 points 10 months ago (3 children)

For literal months now because of ChatGPT and reddit, if you google "countries in Africa that start with the letter K" for the first two results Google will say that none exist.

So yes, I would say Google search results are getting worse.

[–] BackOnMyBS 15 points 10 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] VantaBrandon 19 points 10 months ago

On the flipside for advertisers, prices for ad clicks have never been higher. Its so outrageously high now, making Google such an obscene amount of money, that its unlikely to get better, I'd expect it to get much worse.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago

Yeah, they've been getting progressively less useful. UBlock Origin helps but I feel like Google Search was much better in the past.

I saw an article on a technology Lemmy the other day that showed how Google was pretty much helping to make sure you get shitty results. I'll have to see if I can find it and link it.

[–] Dead_or_Alive 14 points 10 months ago

I stopped using Google as my primary search engine all together. I now just use bing or duck duck go. Google is the last place I try searching.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (4 children)

100% the page ranking system is too easy to abuse. So a lot of garbage gets to the top of results.

But the internet is just too big to do proper index searches like the old days.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LemmyIsFantastic 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't mean this mean I'm genuinely curious. Do you not use the front page or only really occasionally use lemmy world?

I'm just so curious how you don't see this every day on the feeds. Again I'm not meaning this like, GO USE A SEARCH ENGINE! it's just that this is such a prevalent topic here, and lemmy is so niche, how you've avoided an answer up until this post?!

[–] Mr_Blott 12 points 10 months ago

He probably googled it and got an LLM telling him Google search is still amazing and it's all his imagination

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Google has been useless for me for years now. I switched to DuckDuckGo like 5 years ago and every now and then if I accidentally even stray onto Google, I'm just scared by the results

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I use perplexity.ai

Hoping that one day it takes my job and I am okay with it. I already hate my job

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LifeOfChance 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I was just talking to some people about this. I use to be the guy who researched everything now I feel stupid AF because finding what I'm looking for feels impossible at times. Hell there's times where I search something and Google even says "there's nothing to find".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›