this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
286 points (95.3% liked)

politics

19148 readers
4073 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Biden told a Democratic lawmaker and members of his Cabinet after the State of the Union address that he told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that they will need to have a “come-to-Jesus meeting.”

Biden’s comments, captured on a hot mic as he spoke with Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) on the floor of the House chamber, came after Bennet congratulated the commander in chief on his speech and pressed him to keep pressure on Netanyahu over increasing humanitarian issues in Gaza.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 8 months ago (5 children)

The irony is funny, but that is a common idiom in english speaking countries. Biden isn't literally going to speak to Netanyahu about converting to Christianity as if he's some sort of political missionary.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Uh it sounds very much like an America idiom to me mate.

Cant say it’s something I’ve ever heard it in Australia, nor would i expect such a religious phrase (outside of expletives) to be that common.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I believe it is American specifically, I haven't even heard it in Canada. But it is a very secular saying - it has a religious background but is used in irreligious contexts all the time.

[–] mkwt 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

It's American specifically. "Come-to-Jesus" evokes the tent revival culture that started in the second great awakening in the 1830s and continues to the present day.

In the tent revival culture, an itinerant preacher will ride into a (typically small) town and pitch a tent for about a week or two (or more). They then attempt to "revive" the faith of the townspeople by preaching intensely for several hours at a time, sometimes for multiple times per day. In typical Christian fashion these services will include multiple invitations to literally "come to Jesus" by publicly confessing sins and professing faith before the whole group, thereby becoming born again. Regular church goers are expected to attend revival sessions every night when they're in town.

Everything about the tent revivals evokes imagery of the early Christians in Acts and the epistles. Large crowds and mass conversions. That sort of thing.

[–] grue 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

and pitch a tent for about a week or two (or more)

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[–] nomous 2 points 8 months ago

Come to Jesus or cum to Jesus.

[–] AutistoMephisto 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yep. Some of these things get unhinged. People speaking in tongues, mass hysteria, chanting, singing, etc. It's at these revivals that it definitely looks like the cult it really is.

[–] jaybone 2 points 8 months ago

So much LARPing.

[–] m13 3 points 8 months ago

Thank you for the context.

[–] FuglyDuck 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It’s very much an American (and specifically Christian) idiom.

I’ve never heard somebody who wasn’t nominally Christian use it.

[–] TexasDrunk 11 points 8 months ago

I'm not, and I use it at work when someone is stepping out of line. However, I was raised Christian. I always assumed it was a southern saying like so much other shit that accidentally falls out of my mouth.

[–] Witchfire 1 points 8 months ago

I've never heard it in NY

[–] cosmicrookie 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Like a stern talking to. To bring someone in line.

[–] bitchkat 1 points 8 months ago

They are going to see the light whether they want to or not.

[–] Ensign_Crab 3 points 8 months ago

I mean, it's more likely than placing conditions on arms sales or withholding support at the UN.

[–] givesomefucks 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Was common...

Like 60 years ago when Biden was in college.

[–] MutilationWave 7 points 8 months ago

All my bosses over the past twenty years have used the same term about either me or a coworker.

[–] Maggoty 4 points 8 months ago

Oh it's very much still in use.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Still, a more deft politician would avoid using that specific idiom when it comes to a conflict between Jews and (predominantly) Muslims.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He was talking to a US Senator, not an Israeli or a Palestinian

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Have you ever avoided saying "It'll be a slam dunk" in front of us Bostinians because you're afraid we'll interpret that as you assuming we're all fond of Dunkin Donuts and that's a generalization?