Fuck AI

1766 readers
280 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

I want to apologize for changing the description without telling people first. After reading arguments about how AI has been so overhyped, I'm not that frightened by it. It's awful that it hallucinates, and that it just spews garbage onto YouTube and Facebook, but it won't completely upend society. I'll have articles abound on AI hype, because they're quite funny, and gives me a sense of ease knowing that, despite blatant lies being easy to tell, it's way harder to fake actual evidence.

I also want to factor in people who think that there's nothing anyone can do. I've come to realize that there might not be a way to attack OpenAI, MidJourney, or Stable Diffusion. These people, which I will call Doomers from an AIHWOS article, are perfectly welcome here. You can certainly come along and read the AI Hype Wall Of Shame, or the diminishing returns of Deep Learning. Maybe one can even become a Mod!

Boosters, or people who heavily use AI and see it as a source of good, ARE NOT ALLOWED HERE! I've seen Boosters dox, threaten, and harass artists over on Reddit and Twitter, and they constantly champion artists losing their jobs. They go against the very purpose of this community. If I hear a comment on here saying that AI is "making things good" or cheering on putting anyone out of a job, and the commenter does not retract their statement, said commenter will be permanently banned. FA&FO.

2
3
28
For Starters (self.fuck_ai)
submitted 10 months ago by VerbFlow to c/fuck_ai
 
 

Alright, I just want to clarify that I've never modded a Lemmy community before. I just have the mantra of "if nobody's doing the right thing, do it yourself". I was also motivated by the decision from u/spez to let an unknown AI company use Reddit's imagery. If you know how to moderate well, please let me know. Also, feel free to discuss ways to attack AI development, and if you have evidence of AIBros being cruel and remorseless, make sure to save the evidence for people "on the fence". Remember, we don't know if AI is unstoppable. AI uses up loads of energy to be powered, and tons of circuitry. There may very well be an end to this cruelty, and it's up to us to begin that end.

4
5
 
 

The weird part is the AI got it right in the search I did prior to this one

6
7
8
 
 
9
10
11
 
 

Generative artificial intelligence will never completely replace us at work: it will exploit workers more effectively, a report by Data & Society shows.

The media hype surrounding AI has had three effects. First, it has helped us forget that this technology will mostly affect work rather than leisure. Second, it has exaggerated AI’s capacity to replicate the knowledge and expertise of workers. Finally, it has understated the drawbacks of AI, most notably in its potential to exploit legal loopholes – in particular in copyright law. In general terms, AI reduces human work to a collection of data points, all while it remains highly dependent on that work in order to function. To develop a successful AI, one must not only tap into intellectual property without consent, but also extract data from workers.

12
13
476
My Honest Opinion (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 days ago by ekZepp to c/fuck_ai
 
 
14
15
26
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by gofsckyourself to c/fuck_ai
 
 

Recently, I saw a post on Lemmy of an article that piqued my interest, at least enough to try to validate the information in it. When I followed the link, I was greeted with a clearly AI generated image (it showed trump with an extra finger).

I immediately lost trust in the article and made a comment regarding that. (Link)

But the reaction to this was surprising to me. I got a response stating that the author has a background of being an established writer and reporter, as well as received a lot of downvotes. However, no one responded to my points on the use of AI.

My thoughts are that if you are making money on something, then you need to avoid AI when possible and reasonable.

What's going on here? Am I wrong and this is somehow an acceptable use of AI?

[Edit] side note of something that that just occurred to me: don't go to that thread to manipulate the votes or start ""brigading"" against it for the AI. I just wanted to discuss it here. Thanks.

16
 
 

Could things like this be what bursts the AI bubble?

EDIT: The BBC now has a continuous coverage article. Headlines:

  • More than $500bn erased from Nvidia's value
  • China throws wrench into AI race on a seemingly shoestring budget
  • 'AI's Sputnik moment'

And of course:

How much have big tech stock prices dropped? published at 12:16

At the time of writing, these are Monday's losses from some of the biggest tech companies in the US.

  • Microsoft : 3.7% drop
  • Nvidia, the third-most valuable company in the US, behind Microsoft and Apple: 15% drop
  • Alphabet (Google): 2.6% drop
  • Tesla: 1.5% drop
  • Cisco Systems: 4.9% drop
  • Chipmaker Broadcom: 16.43% drop

Apple and Meta have slightly increased in value today, with Apple up 2.65% and Meta up 1.69%.

17
18
19
 
 

20
 
 
21
22
23
24
25
view more: next ›