this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
629 points (93.4% liked)

politics

18080 readers
3330 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 186 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Fair and likely but Mary doesn’t fucking know anything.

[–] [email protected] 98 points 6 months ago (6 children)

True, but these are not the words of innocent men.

Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung told Newsweek in a Saturday email that it is "unprofessional" to ask if the binder was sold to Russia. "What proof do you have?" he asked.

[–] NounsAndWords 63 points 6 months ago

It sounds like Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung also has no clue, but he's seen this one enough times to know that his outright denial would probably be contradicted by Trump within the week.

[–] cheese_greater 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Ah, the ol' Criminal reverse burden/onus of proof. Counter with the old motherly trick, why might I have reason to even need to bring this up with you...

What would Mary do/There's something off about Mary...

[–] AlfredEinstein 4 points 6 months ago

It sounds like this story originated with Trump to create a fake news story to distract from the real news of his court cases.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AlfredEinstein 22 points 6 months ago

This whole binder story smells like the kind of news stories we were fed during the early years of his presidency. It's so 2017, throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks.

We don't need any new controversies. We need to see the felonies that have already been charged be prosecuted intelligently and effectively.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

Yea, this isn’t news

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I don't believe it, but only because he's too incompetent to have kept that kind of high treason a secret.

I absolutely would believe that he kept it with his poop magazines and it was stolen, or copied, by the Carpet King of Tampa, or a foreign intelligence asset. Either one is just as likely.

[–] Slwh47696 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He's honestly stupid enough that he'd be bragging about the money he made from the sale if he did sell it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"I think NATO is going to be very surprised...I had the best Generals, they wouldn't be surprised...the traitor generals who supported the election hoax and Joe Biden, they'll be surprised because they aren't good, okay, they're bad, very bad. My dad, very smart, so smart, he always said sell your books when you're done with them. Did you know binders are books? No one knew, but they are. I'm very smart and very good at deals. I make the deals, I sold a book for 50 million dollars, a book? Can you imagine? Joe Biden wouldn't of gotten $20, so dumb. I got the most votes, ever, can you believe that?"

That's my point. I don't believe he sold it to the Russians. I can absolutely believe that his actions directly lead to being aquired by foreign agents, or the Carpet King of Tampa.

[–] [email protected] 85 points 6 months ago (2 children)

When Trump hosted the KGB diplomats in the White House, when he confiscated his translators notes after his meeting with Putin, after he betrayed the Kurds, the media would ask, "Why did Trump do this?"

There were always a range of possible reasons, but only one that explained them all with perfect sense. I suggest everyone read American Kompromat by Craig Unger. There is a trail of circumstantial evidence Trump has been a Russian asset since at least 1986.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (3 children)

At this point, do you really think it will damage him?

[–] Decoy321 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The piss tape had a lot more than just the sex act. It was full of kompromat.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Still, at this point I can't really see it damaging him.

Republicans seem to be way way past caring about morality, ethics, or embarrassment of any kind.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

If he enjoyed a prostate massage, that might do it. Never underestimate homophobia

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

The reveal of his goomba might.

[–] Pretzilla 10 points 6 months ago

The P in P-tape is pedophilia

He is known to have raped underage girls and pootin has the goods, just as likely through Epstein

[–] [email protected] 71 points 6 months ago (1 children)

why is that pig not in chains

[–] FinalRemix 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Because those in power support this kind of behavior.

[–] Beetschnapps 44 points 6 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GladiusB 12 points 6 months ago

Correction. They support your outrage. They want it to become a shit show so you won't pay attention to the dozen of things they should be doing. Or working for the people. This kind of thing just makes certain decisions that seem less important get passed or neglected.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 6 months ago

May have? It would be more surprising news if he didn't.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago

Business is business, isn’t that what he says? Business as usual for a bloke who keeps top secret documents in his spare bathroom.

[–] hOrni 29 points 6 months ago

May have? This guy would sell his own daughter if he could. And I'm not eve talking about the one whose name he doesn't know, I'm talking about the one he wants to fuck.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's obvious that Trump sold out US intelligence assets across the world, leading to major setbacks in our intel community and the deaths of multiple people, so if this is true... will it make any difference? At all? Trump could come out and declare himself a vassal of the New Russian Empire and his followers would still lick his boots, and 'moderates' would say "Well, what about the DEMONRATS"

[–] grabyourmotherskeys 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They, in fact, do talk up Russia as though it is some free speech, all the guns you want, libertarian paradise. It's incredible to see.

[–] Serinus 2 points 6 months ago

all the guns you want

More, even. Now get out there on the front line, maggot.

[–] Raiderkev 19 points 6 months ago

Fucking duh. Why else would he have taken a fucking truckload of classified docs?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

Oh so she just learned that he may have sold a binder? She wasn't just holding onto this little pearl in order to sell another book was she? Any of Trump's circle, even his ostensibly "nice" niece Mary, is just an opportunist looking to cash in on the chaos.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (7 children)

Newsweek is trash. this is clickbait.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] recapitated 5 points 6 months ago

Man what is up with Republicans and their binders?

[–] Stanwich 3 points 6 months ago

Where the fuck are all your patriots on this one?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The binder in question contained raw intelligence that the United States and its North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) allies collected on Russia's alleged election interference in 2016, when Trump beat his Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton for the presidency, among other documents, according to Reuters who spoke with a source familiar with the matter.

"Let me put it this way, if the government ever had evidence Donald Trump purposely handed classified info to a hostile power, he would never see the light of day again," she wrote, who also added that the documents could have also been destroyed, lost, or kept by someone.

Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung told Newsweek in a Saturday email that it is "unprofessional" to ask if the binder was sold to Russia.

Trump wanted to declassify materials in the binder related to the FBI's investigation into Russia's alleged election interference, according to the source.

A federal court document filed in August by journalist John Solomon, who Trump appointed to be a representative authorized to access his presidential records in the National Archives, gives some insight into who had their hands on the missing binder.

On January 19, 2021, just one day before Trump left office, Meadows invited Solomon to the White House to review declassified pages and discuss its public release, according to the court document.


The original article contains 747 words, the summary contains 219 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] cheese_greater 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Please fucking let it be so and soooo public([ly]

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›