Wanna explain why you were kissing the ring for two years then, Paul?
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Whatever values they claim to hold, in the end conservatives only recognize one virtue: power.
Not even. It has to be tyranny. They don't respect power on its own.
Tax cuts. Remember when he helped pass a $1.5 trillion unfunded tax cut for the wealthy then resigned? That was the only issue he cared about, and he cared more about that than about being honest about Trump's behavior
"I didn't know" you will probably hear.
for the tax cuts he promised to his wealthy backers
“…who I gladly enabled as much as I could for as long as possible…”
For as long as it benefited myself.
I feel like politicians are taking advantage of how short the average U.S. person's attention span is. (Mine included)
"LOOK OVER HERE" politician says, as they do a bad thing in the opposite direction
"Hey, wait a minute..." Some people
"HEY LOOK AT THAT GUY" politician to one of the people noticing
And the heads just keep turning, the pitchforks keep coming out, and soon it's a jumbled mess of misinformation, distraction, confusion and in-fighting.
How do we even begin to fix it?
You can start by paying attention to who the bad guys are and remembering their names, or at least their party affiliation. The same ones turn up over and under most of the time, so it's not as big a task as you would think.
As for fixing the attention span of people who just can't be bothered, I have no idea.
Its not even about short attention span. Its a trick as old as time and right out of the fascist playbook.
Gish gallop
Nobody can keep up with all the bs
Bent the knee and polished the knob
Oh no, I'm throwing up in my mouth!
Hmm sure but even if it's not forgiven, maybe looking forward seeing he has changed his mind at least
It doesn't really matter when he willfully overlooked so much to even make this assertion, and then to follow through with it as well. He KNEW what he was when he made this statement, same as the new statements.
You know, one thing I'll give Liz Cheney and Kinzinger, they weren't afraid to speak the truth while still in office. Spineless fucks like Paul Ryan here might've actually been able to do something if they had.
What’s the point of getting elected if you aren’t there to do the right thing at all costs, even losing your seat.
'And yet, I'm gonna vote for him anyway'
-Also Paul Ryan (probably)
Fuck Paul Ryan. Traitor shitcunt, like nearly all other republicans. Fuck off and die.
Well, duh. It's not like you didn't contribute to putting him in power you ass.
Too little, too late, you spineless sycophant.
Paul Ryan is mostly upset that Trump beat him to it.
From a leaked 2016 recording while this righteous asshole was Speaker:
McCarthy: "There’s two people I think Putin pays: Rohrabacher and Trump. Swear to God."
Ryan: "This is an off-the-record. No leaks, alright?"
McCarthy: "Alright."
Ryan: "This is how we know we’re a real family here."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/515f6f8a-3aff-11e7-8854-21f359183e8c_story.html
We truly are a docile populace
Uhhh this is exactly why his followers love him.
Is that semen on your black eye?
This is a compliment coming from Ryan.
I absolutely despise Paul Ryan, but he is nothing if not a libertarian in Republican clothing. The man hates Trump almost as much I hate him.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Donald Trump is “not a conservative”, the former Republican House speaker Paul Ryan said, but “a populist, authoritarian narcissist”.
He was speaking to Kevin Kajiwara, co-president of Teneo Political Risk Advisory, in a podcast interview recorded in November but widely noticed this week.
Voices on both sides of the main political aisle have criticised Ryan for not strongly opposing Trump when he ran for the Republican nomination in 2016, or through four chaotic years in the White House that ended in the deadly January 6 attack on Congress.
Kajiwara asked Ryan how he thought history would judge Kinzinger and Cheney, conservative Republicans from Illinois and Wyoming who stood against Trump and sat on the January 6 committee before being forced out of Congress.
Historians searching for the roots of Trumpism have generally looked to the 1990s, when another Republican speaker, Newt Gingrich, turned Congress into a scorched-earth battleground; to the rise of Fox News; or to opposition to Barack Obama, the first Black president, particularly through the Tea Party movement.
Ryan, an economic conservative who was Mitt Romney’s running mate in 2012, continued: “There has to be some line, some principle that is so important to you that you’re just not going to cross, so that when you’re brushing your teeth in the morning, look yourself in the mirror, you like what you see.
The original article contains 583 words, the summary contains 224 words. Saved 62%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
One of those things is not like the others.
Populism, in the American context, was a proto-leftist movement with a "fuck the bankers" vibe. I believe it had the most traction during the depression with dust bowl era farmers, but someone can correct me if I'm wrong on that. Regardless, it was a popular bottom up political movement, which is why it's been vilifed by the ruling class and media ever since.
Yes, I know there are people who label themselves as right wing reactionary populists, but letting them freely co-opt that political movement is akin to letting the National Socialists co-opt a socialist movement.
Paul Ryan isn't always wrong.