this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
753 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19241 readers
3077 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TheGuardian.com

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Xylinna 162 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Whose record did we break? Our own?

[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

We're number 1!!! Eat it, Canada!

[–] postmateDumbass 25 points 1 year ago

It's like the other countries aren't even trying.

[–] Nudding 16 points 1 year ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheJims 110 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We’re Number One!!!

USA! USA! USA!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (6 children)

🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 91 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Some, such as the Gun Violence Archive, include events in which multiple people are shot regardless of number of deaths, and so report much higher figures.

This carries a fun implication: let’s deflate the number of mass shooting by only including the deaths and not how many people are actually shot (and perhaps saved by emergency room personnel).

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It also misses the damage done by witnessing that violence and being shot at and losing loved ones to gun violence.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It also ignores any lingering effects the survivors might suffer, whether physically or mentally. Just because you're alive doesn't mean you are whole.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It also encourages confusion that each mass shooting is someone trying to kill as many people as possible in a public place, when that overwhelmingly isn't actually true.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

That last part is important, because our emergency responders have gotten very good at saving lives (sadly, they've had to). People will point to deaths as the only relevant stat--and it's amazing that isn't enough for some people--but it's a huge burden and cost for healthcare.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 22 points 1 year ago

Mass shooting, not mass killing. I'd even want to know about instances of multiple, unrelated targets. If we get a string of shooters with terrible aim and nobody is actually hurt I don't consider that an improvement of our epidemic.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I can already hear the wing conspiracy theories about how liberal doctors are letting mass shooting victims die in order to bolster the numbers.

Kind of like the conspiracies they’d throw around about the numbers of cases and deaths related to Covid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot 73 points 1 year ago (6 children)

YEAH!

WE DID IT AMERICA!

U.S.A! U.S.A.! U.S.A!

All these senseless murders every fucking year, and not one of them directed at the republicans that have ruined everything.

[–] dangblingus 37 points 1 year ago (17 children)

It's conservatives doing the shootings. Why does it seem that 95% of all mass shooters have a white supremacist manifesto?

[–] sploosh 27 points 1 year ago

Because white supremacists' arguments are easily dismantled to their core components of idiocy, racism and ignorance. They can't convince anyone who isn't a moron racist and they believe that those who don't think like they do are trying to replace them so they resort to mass murder. Because they are racist morons.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] cosmicrookie 63 points 1 year ago (26 children)

Remember back in July 2022, when there was a mass shooting in Denmark and some Americans would say "see it happens even in a gun regulated country"?

There hasn't been one since...

[–] PostaL 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If you make the same search for America, letter B is probably on ~~purge~~ page 3

[–] sweetmartabak 24 points 1 year ago

purge 3

Quite the Freudian slip

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And we'll do nothing about it as always. On to the next year. America, you're a real winner.

[–] glitch1985 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not true. We posted some "thoughts and prayers" messages to Facebook. What else did you expect, actual gun control?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MushuChupacabra 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

To celebrate the milestone, ArmaLite is offering a ten percent discount on the purchase of a new AR-15!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (4 children)

[I]n Dallas a 21-year-old with a previous aggravated assault charge shot five people in a house, including a toddler.

If that toddler was armed it wouldn't have happened

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Sadly I would put more faith into a good guy toddler with a gun than the police from Uvalde.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] set_secret 34 points 1 year ago
[–] Mediocre_Bard 31 points 1 year ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most mass shootings in a single year so far.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sjkhgsi 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] assassin_aragorn 15 points 1 year ago

"Says only country where this happens" :(

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Those fools! If only we had 1.3 guns per person to defend ourselves!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm excited for people to come into this thread and insist on a definition of assault rifle.

[–] Witchfire 27 points 1 year ago

Or mass shooting

It's not a mass shooting unless it happens in Massachusetts, otherwise it's just sparkling shooting

[–] boatsnhos931 20 points 1 year ago

USA! USA! USA! NUMBER 1 BAYBAY! (Shotgun blasts)

[–] WoahWoah 18 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Isn't this old news already? Wasn't there already another mass shooting at UNLV that barely makes the news because this happens like three times a month?

What a world.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Pro Life! Fuck yea!

load more comments
view more: next ›