this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
314 points (96.7% liked)

politics

19156 readers
3257 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The White House on Monday launched accounts on Meta’s Threads service for President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, gaining a sizable following on an app that competes with Elon Musk’s X.

Accounts on Threads were also established for the first lady and second gentleman as well as for the White House itself. Biden’s account racked up 2 million followers within an hour of its debut.

The Threads push comes after Musk last week called an antisemitic conspiracy theory “the actual truth” on X to his 163 million listed followers. He also said some “Jewish communities” promote “anti-white” messaging and views, calling out the Anti-Defamation League and minorities. White House officials repeatedly rebuked Musk for what they called “anti-semitic rhetoric” on X over the last week.

Several major advertisers including Apple and Disney subsequently paused their spending on X. Musk defended himself on Sunday, without apologizing or rescinding his statements.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cfi 113 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Woulda been cooler if they spun up a US government Mastodon instance and made his account there, but this is certainly a step in the right direction

[–] rockSlayer 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Threads will eventually add activitypub, so someone with sway will learn about mastodon soon enough

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I kinda thought it would have happened by now, I hope they aren't quietly shelving development like Tumblr did

[–] grue 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Considering much of the Fediverse immediately pledged not to federate with them (for good reason, frankly), maybe they took the hint?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I hope they're still working on it though because I would like to have the option to follow the people who use Threads while not using Threads myself.

[–] rockSlayer 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Well just last week they finally made it possible to delete your threads account without deleting your instagram account. Something tells me that the Zucc isn't very invested in the platform

[–] Nightwingdragon 8 points 1 year ago

Well just last week they finally made it possible to delete your threads account without deleting your instagram account. Something tells me that the Zucc isn’t very invested in the platform

After seeing everything Musk is doing to seemingly destroy twitter from within in real time, if Zucc isn't doing everything short of zapping his employees with a cattle prod in order to lure Twitter users to Threads right now when Twitter is at its weakest, he's just as fucking stupid as Musk is.

[–] Tarquinn2049 6 points 1 year ago

Hopefully having the president on the platform will help draw his attention towards it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Based on my experience in lemmy, if you are avoiding antisemitism, mastodon probably isn't a good place to go.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Lemmy is probably still one of the best I've seen; but that's also a reallyyy low bar.

There is a lot of anti-Israel on lemmy, but I believe in good faith it isn't coming from a core place of anti-semitism. Like like, anti-US if anything.

[–] drislands 9 points 1 year ago

People jump to conclusions real fuckin fast on here, so let me put a disclaimer:

The Palestinian people, and the Israeli people, are ultimately the victims of everything that is happening and has happened in recent months. The Israeli government, and Hamas, are both terrorist organizations that need to be stopped.

That out of the way, I agree with you. There are people on here that express legitimate grievances with Israel, and a lot of folks will immediately counter that they must be supporting Hamas.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My anti-Israel stance is about the shitty humans in charge of its current regime and their abhorrent human rights abuses. It has nothing to do with the religion of anyone involved, except to the extent that all fundamentalism is bad.. my heart goes out to all the Israelis who have been hurt by their government's bad decisions - which includes cultivating a violent extremist opposition allowing them to justify violence of their own. The US uses the same playbook, and I condemn it for that too.

[–] DrZoidbergYes 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are you confusing animtisem with being against a horrific genocide that has being going on for decades? A lot of Americans don't seem to be able to make the destination. Hamas is a shockingly disgusting terrorist group, that doesn't mean Israel isn't a shockingly disgusting terrorist state. Being anti Israel is not the same as being anti Jewish

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheDarkKnight 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is most likely because they can be officially verified on Threads and limit a situation of impersonation (if I had to guess). I don’t use threads so idk but I it would be a major concern to be spoofed which is a lot easier on decentralized instances at the moment.

Does anyone know if there is a verified focused instance that’s invite only and has a vetting process for notable people?

[–] grue 9 points 1 year ago

It is most likely because they can be officially verified on Threads

I'm pretty sure having an account on (a hypothetical) mastodon.gov would be plenty of verification!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can be verified on Mastodon, too. You just have to put a line of html on a website you control and you are verified by that website. For most of us, that is of limited use. I'm verified by my Github account which is also an anonymous alias (I enjoy my privacy), but having a verified link to whitehouse.gov would be pretty definitive.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I mean, who is going to claim that [email protected] or [email protected] would be any other Mastodon user? Presumably any official US government mastodon or lemmy instance wouldn't allow for public signups.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 year ago

Facebook: oh shit we left that on

[–] Nightwingdragon 54 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There's a lot of criticism of this move which I think is unwarranted.

Because of Musk's statements, continuing to post on Twitter (I refuse to call it X) is becoming less and less tenable for a lot of people.

But the White House isn't concerned with which competitor will rise to take its place. They're not interested in supporting a corporation vs. a competitive startup. The White House is solely interested in reaching the highest number of people possible with official communications. And for better or worse, Threads is going to be the closest thing to having an active userbase that's anywhere close to the size of Twitter. Mastodon as a whole wouldn't even come close; Mastodon has about 1.8 million users/month. Biden got that on Threads in under an hour.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree with the sentiment, but they could just do both. It's not like they are mutually exclusive.

If they want to reach more people, Mastadon will help them do it.

[–] ExcursionInversion 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Haven't looked into Mastodon too much, but would it be able to handle that much traffic? I remember some of the Lemmy instances had issues when reddit dropped 3rd party API.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I can't imagine people flooding Mastodon with new signups and traffic just to follow Biden. There would likely be a little bump as it gets reported and more people get curious, but most would likely be more along the lines of "oh that's nice" and go right back to Twitter/threads.

I sorta think, had this happened in the run-up to 2008, it's possible that people might have flooded it to follow Obama, but Biden doesn't have anywhere near the pull with young voters that Obama had. Back then we voted for Obama. Now we vote against Trump, and Biden just happens to be the beneficiary. No one is going to change their online presence just because he moved his soapbox.

[–] grue 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If European governments can manage to join Mastodon, the Biden administration has no excuse.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] atx_aquarian 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not arguing against Threads being a wider audience, but I do just want to point out that many people may be auto-following. I keep seeing notifications from Threads that I'm now following someone because I was previously already following them (on FB, I guess), and I haven't opened Threads in a while.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] assassin_aragorn 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Am I disappointed it's still a shitty social media company? Yes.

But is this a good thing? Absolutely. Biden moving to threads gives threads more legitimacy as a competitor. When more groups start using something other than Twitter for communication, Twitter can finally die.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah, Meta sucks, but it doesn't suck at the Elon Musk level. Lesser evil and all.

[–] FlyingSquid 28 points 1 year ago

He also said some “Jewish communities” promote “anti-white” messaging and views

I just have to point out once again that Jews are only white when it's convenient.

[–] Son_of_dad 12 points 1 year ago

From one jackass platform to the other

[–] NocturnalMorning 11 points 1 year ago

Nothing in the world is ever going to get me to join a Meta run service.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Join Mastodon, you corporate cowards.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

*Biden's PR team joins Meta's Threads

[–] Muyal 7 points 1 year ago

From a right wing monopolistic billionaire to another right wing monopolistic millionaire

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

From one creepy billionaire’s closed platform to another. Not much of an improvement.

[–] ExfilBravo 7 points 1 year ago

Like leaving your abusive boyfriend for your abusive ex-husband.