this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
312 points (95.9% liked)

News

22802 readers
5343 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] afraid_of_zombies 31 points 9 months ago (6 children)

I don't see why calling for a ceasefire is such a non-starter. Everyone there can go back to work butchering each other more effectively if they are well rested.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

The entire country of Israel wants to build back their military reputation for deterrence. Opposing political parties got together to back their military response. Plus, almost everyone in Israel knows someone killed or captured by Hamas, that's why it was 15 9/11s or whatever. There is no high minded worry about peaceful ideals when your kid was killed by Hamas.

I'm against all the killing and especially of civilians, I think the US should and is pushing for a ceasefire, but I also see why it isn't working. It's not because the administration isn't trying hard enough, it's because nothing will stop the fighting until Israel achieves at least some of its goal for destroying Hamas and building back the deterrence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

And israel will destroy hamas, much like all terrorist organizations have been destroyed in the past.

[–] interceder270 -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It’s not because the administration isn’t trying hard enough, it’s because nothing will stop the fighting until Israel achieves at least some of its goal for destroying Hamas and building back the deterrence.

Errr... exactly what has the administration done? What consequences have there been for Israel, threatened or realized?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They got the 4hr pauses. The president went there. The Secretary of State went there. The land assault was pushed off for days in the beginning. They moved two carrier groups into the region to deter Hezbollah and Iran, and Iran has officially said they will not get involved.

They don't negotiate in public so obviously there is no example of threats, but there is evidence of an attempt at moderating the Israeli response, and in the past Biden's strategy has been to hug Israel in public to get as much as possible in private, something like agreeing to refuse to call for a ceasefire in public, as long as Israel does do the 4hr pauses. That very much reads to me as what the Admin achieved.

And since a ceasefire isn't on the table regardless of consequences right now due to Israeli domestic politics, a short 4hr daily ceasefire-in-all-but-name is a pretty big get.

[–] interceder270 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Use available information to make an educated guess. As opposed to your method of deciding that because the maximalist position has not been achieved, clearly nobody has done anything at all.

[–] interceder270 -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

because the maximalist position has not been achieved

Lol, you mean doing anything at all? Didn't know that was a 'maximalist' position.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

They got the 4hr pauses

[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's also because the administration isn't trying hard enough. Reagan stopped the bombing of West Beirut with a phone call. Biden should at least be able to get Israel to follow the rules of war if he threatens them with cutting aid. Also these are 1200 people in a population of 10 million. I find it very hard to believe that most people know someone who was killed or captured.

[–] SheeEttin 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, but Biden knows that if he cuts aid, the vocal Jewish/Israel/Zionist lobby will freak the fuck out.

[–] interceder270 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Who... cares? Why should zionists get more influence over American foreign policy than the rest of Americans?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. Why in the hell are we bending over backwards to make one group happy when most sentiment is moving in a different direction?

I don't understand why everyone in DC is so scared of Israeli lobbyists.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Makes you wonder what dirt Mossad has on any of our politicians.

Which in a roundabout way is an argument for term limits; higher turnover provides less opportunity for skeletons to pile up in closets to compromise any vestigal integrity they have after becoming a politician.

[–] Aqarius 0 points 9 months ago

Well, unofficially, it's sort of recognised Ghislaine Maxwell's father was an Israeli spy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

So what's the catch?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Hamas’ popularity with the people and their allies is really low right now. A victory (cease fire) corrects that for them

And also your second part, it’s a lot easier for them to attack Israel if they aren’t expecting it

Israel and Palestine don’t gain anything from a ceasefire unless negotiations take place

[–] deleted 2 points 9 months ago

Every side have their own agenda. Every now and then stars align.

If you go back 3-4 decades, you’ll notice a pattern.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

I think it is because if the Israelis kill a lot of people in Gaza right now, they can later say it is because they were hot-headed and not planning things properly (which they should do anyways, so it doesn't really matter). If they stop now, and go back to attacking again later, they can't say that anymore.

[–] interceder270 -2 points 9 months ago

Because why would Israel stop their genocide if they don't have to?

Conducting airstrikes isn't nearly as exhausting as getting hit by them.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago (3 children)

This might genuinely be what does Biden in in 2024.

[–] TheOgreChef 24 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Yes, because whomever Biden loses to will DEFINITELY have a different policy on Israel that couldn’t possibly be worse in every measure.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You're right, but when people are disillusioned with the democratic process they just don't vote, and this does outsized damage to democrats.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

And theyre more likely to listen to the astroturfing trolls on this platform and others.

[–] randon31415 4 points 9 months ago

Israel is supporting Ukraine. Ukraine and Israel funding in the US congress seems tied together. Guess who want's Ukraine's funding cut? Trump's boss.

[–] interceder270 4 points 9 months ago

Already gearing up to support the 'lesser evil', lol.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Doesn't matter; people aren't very rational.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Doesn't matter, people aren't very rational.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

His admin got the 4hr pauses, they are absolutely getting a ceasefire by the time of the election in 2024.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It does him in because it hasn’t been demanded of Israel beginning in the first week of the genocide. Yes, this is a genocide perpetrated by the Israelis, and the majority of us do not want our taxpayer dollars funding it. Biden the war hawk acts as if there’s no other choice, and he’s clearly wrong about that.

That said, it would be 100% Biden’s MO to get the ceasefire sometime next year after hundreds of thousands more civilian casualties and call that a “win.” Pathetic, dinosaur, loser.

[–] banneryear1868 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Biden was a darling of the Israel lobby for most of his career. His Vice Presidency was a fig leaf thrown to satiate them into supporting Obama's presidential run, since Obama was known for openly recognizing the situation and even attended pro-Palestine events and lectures.

Americans don't really have a say in their foreign policy, it's basically whatever the military industrial complex decides is in America's best interest.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago
[–] blanketswithsmallpox -1 points 9 months ago

Suuuuure lol.

[–] interceder270 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The US government answers to Israel instead of its own citizens.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Americans will always do the right thing, only after they have tried everything else.

-- Winston Churchill

Not sure about the always part.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

*Always TRY

[–] badbytes 1 points 9 months ago

The whole world is tired of Israel's shit.