It's like the old 'million monkeys on million typewriters will eventually write Shakespear'.
msage
joined 1 year ago
Yes, technically you are correct.
But current technology will not do that. LLMs are not going to get much better, we need more complex setups.
Very unpopular
/b/ was never good.
except for MLP, that was peak
!remindme 6 months
But, surprise, everyone knew all of that 8 fucking years ago.
They knew Trump voters will vote Trump no matter what.
They knew he will spew lies in every direction at record speed.
They knew what has happened to Hillary.
They've seen the Biden victory.
And NOTHING was learned at any of this.
I'm not from the US, but I do blame the DNC ever since 2016. And, while I am distraught and sad that Trump will guarantee the death of us all through global catastrophy, he did nothing new this election, from the previous two. And neither did anyone else. Guess what happens when the people get fucked by high prices and no help?
DNC is actively stopping actual leftists, there is no hope for any meaningful progress, just small kisses of good gestures.
Imagine if the leftists had a manifesto like Project 2025. Imagine strong messages like 'taxes only for the billionaires', 'free press from the oligarchy', 'no more oil subsidies', 'reign in the wall street and blackrock'.
Beatings will continue
Palestine obviously
I feel like people missed the sarcasm a bit here
Not really a language-specific problem, but why should that stop us from this goal?
view more: next ›
Yes, because 'these monkeys' have been reading all of available content humans created, not really fair comparison to infinite scale of pure randomness.
I would argue against pattern machines getting better at recognizing patterns better, but I don't think it would change any minds.