this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
188 points (98.5% liked)

Not The Onion

14882 readers
4436 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sylver_dragon 70 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I owe my soul to the company store.....

[–] UndulyUnruly 12 points 1 month ago

Next stop, severance minus the outie part.

[–] SpaceNoodle 51 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh, for fuck's sake. I started reading this thinking it was satire, and after it just kept going did I realize that this was serious, and not just some long-form ribbing.

[–] Gumus 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We really need a term opposite to "eat the onion".

[–] SpaceNoodle 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I really shat the yam on that one.

[–] rovingnothing29 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't know. I think the opposite of an onion would be an orange not a yam.

[–] ettyblatant 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Well the opposite of eat would be barf, so, "horked the orange"?

Edit: a word

[–] rovingnothing29 3 points 1 month ago
[–] idiomaddict 2 points 1 month ago

I thought horking was snorting. Huh. I wonder whether that’s ever led to communication issues.

[–] Duamerthrax 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They can. It's called Work From Home.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

That’s why they can’t

[–] Badeendje 47 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And pay them with company specific crypto they can spend in the company store.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You push 16 branches, and what do you Git?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Another day older and more tech debt

[–] mojofrododojo 7 points 1 month ago

@saint_peter don't you page me, 'cause I crashed the repo----

I owe my soul

to the bezostore

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago

Corporations: "We will literally do anything to avoid giving our employees dedicated workspace where they can do their job uninterrupted."

[–] ChicoSuave 25 points 1 month ago

Company towns coming back as company apartments.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

in the key of G "and I sold my soul to the company stoooooooore"

[–] glimse 6 points 1 month ago

Glad to see someone on the same page. I read the title and immediately thought SAINT PETER DONTCHA CALL ME 'CAUSE I CAN'T GOOOOOOO

[–] mrfriki 13 points 1 month ago

Sure, let me take a dump on your desk too.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why not cut this slippery slope crap and just go straight to slavery?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they stopped themselves from being literally The Onion just in time

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I find it hard to believe he'd just table the idea at that point.

[–] Agent641 3 points 1 month ago

After the employees realise it's just slaves

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Slaves are more expensive since you have to treat them as capital.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Nah, you generally can depreciate capitalized assets /s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Only if they're regulated. Or if salaried workers have any rights, since you could otherwise just conspire with other companies to push salaries down, ensuring ~~"free" slaves~~ collaborating individual entrepreneurs are cheaper

[–] TrueStoryBob 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"No, no, no, it's not a company town... it's a company tower... which is completely different. By the way, did you meet Brian? He's the new manager of the convenience store the company opened in the lobby. It's right next to the company elementary school. You can use the company issued script to buy stuff there, it's great!"

[–] ProfessorProteus 6 points 1 month ago

I'm sure it was your autocorrect, but for anyone who doesn't know it, the term is "scrip" :)

Wait, I should type :( because it's a very depressing concept.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

It happens, sometimes, if you're hiring someone to work in a remote location. Oil rig workers, say.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

No. They are absolutely desperate to get people to return to office aren’t they?

I’ve said it many times now. The workhouses are coming back.

[–] Maalus 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's what happened here. The mines gave apartments to the miners. The higher ups lived in better ones etc. Worked out well till the mines weren't profitable anymore

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] Maalus 3 points 1 month ago

Nah, Europe isn't as ducked as the US, the apartments just went to them and the city moved away from mining

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Can I pay in company scrips?

[–] P1k1e 8 points 1 month ago

SCP 001 : 05 the Factory

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I get the dystopia but if a company gave me an apartment in the city along with family healthcare where they pay 100% of medical costs. I would take minimum wage.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And your employer would own you. You couldn't afford to ever tell them "No".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

are you kidding. I would be able to save more than ever before and have an easier time leaving.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

This reminds me of the Onion episode where the staff from two different car manufacturing plants fight for there jobs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To actually address the question, it's because commercial buildings don't (generally) meet residential building code requirements, even if there's a kitchenette and a shower, etc. They are simply not meant for the same purpose or to be occupied 24/7 unless they were engineered that way from the start, which is exceedingly rare. A lot of office buildings have floor-to-ceiling windows and complex HVAC systems simply to make sure people aren't cold, breathing stale air, or too humid/dry, so they also use a lot of energy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Also fire safety, if you have people sleeping in the building you need a much higher level of protection.

[–] vane 6 points 1 month ago

Why not let children live in womb ?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, let them work from home.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's the idea.
When the office becomes the home, they are working from home.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you want your office to be home?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

No. I like having two different places for work stuff and not work stuff.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Abso-fucking-lutely not.

load more comments
view more: next ›