Naich

I could have you arrested for that comment.

Closest I can get is my server is hosted with a company called Mythic Beasts, who use mythological beast names for their hardware.

It's a piece of lemon bun from Botham's in Whitby.

Amazing action shot!

I'm still utterly disgusted that the western media present this as anything other than state-backed terrorism.

Not funny misogynistic shit. Reported.

Meat is only cheap because of the subsidies provided to the industry. It's expensive in environmental terms too. There are many sources of protein that don't have either drawback.

Subsidy example: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/applications-open-for-new-4-million-fund-to-support-smaller-abattoirs

Except that the law says the meals have to be nutritious to a set level. So no, they can't do that.

You seem to be under the apprehension that making food without meat in it is some mystic art that is beyond the comprehension of anyone other than his company. What is stopping any other company producing exactly the same products as his? Changing the law will have no effect on the marketplace.

Any company can provide meat-free food. There is no reason this change in law should disadvantage his competitors.

Any company can provide meat-free food. There is no reason for schools to change their existing suppliers.

Personal gain in the case of green lobbying is a subset of universal gain. Exactly the same as Vince's case. It doesn't follow the he will profit more than anyone else, as anyone else can supply meat-free food too.